The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips.

Three experiments investigated the role of pre/post exposure to a masker in a detection task with complex, random, spectro-temporal maskers. In the first experiment, the masker was either continuously presented or pulsed on and off with the signal. For most listeners, thresholds were lower when the masker was continuously presented, despite the fact that there was more uncertainty about the timing of the signal. In the second experiment, the signal-bearing portion of the masker was preceded and followed by masker "fringes" of different durations. Consistent with the findings of Experiment 1, for some listeners shorter-duration fringes led to higher thresholds than long-duration fringes. In the third experiment, the masker fringe (a) preceded, (b) followed, or (c) both preceded and followed, the signal. Relative to the middle signal conditions, a late signal yielded lower thresholds and the early signal yielded higher thresholds. These results indicate that listeners can use features of an ongoing sound to extract an added signal and that listeners differ in the importance of pre-exposure for efficient signal extraction. However, listeners do not appear to perform this comparison retrospectively after the signal, potentially indicating a form of backward masking.

[1]  James P. Egan,et al.  Operating Characteristics, Signal Detectability, and the Method of Free Response , 1961 .

[2]  B. Wright,et al.  Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Reeves,et al.  Role of attention in overshoot: frequency certainty versus uncertainty. , 2008, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Effect of “backward” masker fringe on the detectability of pulsed diotic and dichotic tonal signals , 1972 .

[5]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Binaural masking-level difference as a function of masker and test-signal duration , 1984, Hearing Research.

[6]  Neal F. Viemeister,et al.  Adaptation of Masking , 1980 .

[7]  D. M. Green,et al.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Auditory frequency focusing is very rapid. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. McFadden Masking-level differences with continuous and with burst masking noise. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. McFadden,et al.  Masking-level differences with continuous and with burst masking noise. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Virginia M Richards,et al.  Cuing effects for informational masking. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Rong Huang,et al.  Estimates of internal templates for the detection of sequential tonal patterns. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C S Watson,et al.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Daniel E. Shub,et al.  Psychophysical spectro-temporal receptive fields in an auditory task , 2009, Hearing Research.

[16]  Lori J. Leibold,et al.  The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. Young,et al.  Neural Correlates of Context-Dependent Perceptual Enhancement in the Inferior Colliculus , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Discriminating coherence in spectro-temporal patterns. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Coherence detection: effects of frequency, frequency uncertainty, and onset/offset delays. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  W A Yost Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.