Experimental investigation of multi-span post-tensioned glass beams

This paper presents a study on post-tensioned glass beams in a statically indeterminate system. In order to increase the safety of structural glass beams, ductile reinforcement can be added to glass beam sections providing secondary load carrying mechanism in case of glass breakage. In the here investigated post-tensioned system, the reinforcement tendons are additionally pre-tensioned, introducing compressive pre-stress in the beam in order to increase the apparent tensile strength of glass. The system is tested in five-point bending at 23 and $$60\,^{\circ }\hbox {C}$$60∘C in order to investigate the basic structural performance and the influence of temperature increase on the initial cracking load and the behaviour of the cracked beam. The benefit of the here investigated statically indeterminate system is a more economical design, i.e. lowering of the bending moment in the span of an equivalent simply supported system by continuing the beam over the central support. The efficiency of the applied system is compared to a reinforced beam system produced in the same batch with similar overall dimensions. The results show an increase of initial cracking load of the post-tensioned beams due to the applied pre-stress and a ductile post-cracking response, reaching high ultimate loads prior to failure. At $$60 \, ^{\circ }\hbox {C}$$60∘C both reinforced and post-tensioned beams show lower initial cracking loads and limited post-cracking ductility but still significant load reserve with ultimate loads well above the initial cracking loads, providing safe failure behaviour.

[1]  Robby Caspeele,et al.  Development of Reinforced and Posttensioned Glass Beams: Review of Experimental Research , 2016 .

[2]  Fernando A. Branco,et al.  Experimental study on the flexural behaviour of multi-span transparent glass–GFRP composite beams , 2013 .

[3]  Jan Belis,et al.  On the size and shape of initial out-of-plane curvatures in structural glass components , 2011 .

[4]  Freek Bos,et al.  Stainless steel reinforced and post-tensioned glass beams , 2004 .

[5]  Jean-Paul Lebet,et al.  Exploratory experimental investigations on post-tensioned structural glass beams , 2013 .

[6]  Jan Belis,et al.  Durability of SG-laminated reinforced glass beams: effects of temperature, thermal cycling, humidity and load-duration , 2012 .

[7]  M. Overend,et al.  The effectiveness of resin-based repairs on the inert strength recovery of glass , 2015 .

[8]  Bernhard Weller,et al.  Post-Tensioned Glass Beams for a 9 m Spannglass Bridge , 2016 .

[9]  Alain Nussbaumer,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of SentryGlas$$^{\circledR }$$® ionomer and TSSA silicon bulk materials at different temperatures and strain rates under uniaxial tensile stress state , 2016 .

[10]  Sheldon M. Wiederhorn,et al.  Influence of Water Vapor on Crack Propagation in Soda‐Lime Glass , 1967 .

[11]  Robby Caspeele,et al.  Development of composite glass beams: a review , 2015 .

[12]  C. Louter,et al.  Post-Tensioned Structural Glass Beams - Comparative Experimental Study , 2015 .

[13]  Hans Schober Dr.-Ing.,et al.  Ein Glashaus für die Therme in Badenweiler , 2004 .

[14]  Aldina Santiago,et al.  Behaviour of laminated glass beams reinforced with pre‐stressed cables , 2014 .

[15]  J. Belis,et al.  Failure mechanisms and residual capacity of annealed glass/SGP laminated beams at room temperature , 2009 .

[16]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  Earthquake-Resilience-Based Control Solutions for the Extended Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge , 2016 .

[17]  Robby Caspeele,et al.  Experimental investigations of statically indeterminate reinforced glass beams , 2016 .

[18]  Hans Schober,et al.  Ein Glashaus für die Therme in Badenweiler , 2004 .

[19]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .