Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog–human communication in relatively complex situations

The aim of the present investigation was to study the visual communication between humans and dogs in relatively complex situations. In the present research, we have modelled more lifelike situations in contrast to previous studies which often relied on using only two potential hiding locations and direct association between the communicative signal and the signalled object. In Study 1, we have provided the dogs with four potential hiding locations, two on each side of the experimenter to see whether dogs are able to choose the correct location based on the pointing gesture. In Study 2, dogs had to rely on a sequence of pointing gestures displayed by two different experimenters. We have investigated whether dogs are able to recognise an ‘indirect signal’, that is, a pointing toward a pointer. In Study 3, we have examined whether dogs can understand indirect information about a hidden object and direct the owner to the particular location. Study 1 has revealed that dogs are unlikely to rely on extrapolating precise linear vectors along the pointing arm when relying on human pointing gestures. Instead, they rely on a simple rule of following the side of the human gesturing. If there were more targets on the same side of the human, they showed a preference for the targets closer to the human. Study 2 has shown that dogs are able to rely on indirect pointing gestures but the individual performances suggest that this skill may be restricted to a certain level of complexity. In Study 3, we have found that dogs are able to localise the hidden object by utilising indirect human signals, and they are able to convey this information to their owner.

[1]  Paola Valsecchi,et al.  Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs’ performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem solving task , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  József Topál,et al.  Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[3]  C. Wynne,et al.  Ontogeny's impacts on human–dog communication , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[5]  J. Call,et al.  Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) point to inform a human about the location of a tool , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[6]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. , 2002 .

[7]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[8]  C. Wynne,et al.  Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[10]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[11]  Shanis Barnard,et al.  Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs’ behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[13]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Explaining Dog Wolf Differences in Utilizing Human Pointing Gestures: Selection for Synergistic Shifts in the Development of Some Social Skills , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .

[15]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[16]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task? , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[17]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[18]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[19]  P. Morissette,et al.  Joint visual attention and pointing in infancy: A longitudinal study of comprehension , 1995 .

[20]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The domestication hypothesis for dogs' skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008) , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[23]  G. Butterworth,et al.  How the eyes, head and hand serve definite reference , 2000 .

[24]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants , 2009, Science.

[25]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  V. Csányi,et al.  Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[27]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  The role of visual cues in the comprehension of the human pointing signals in dogs. , 2007 .

[28]  S. Marshall-Pescini,et al.  Comment on “Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants” , 2010, Science.

[29]  Gabriella Lakatos,et al.  A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.