Prediction of Business Partners Using an N-Gram-Based Approach that Combines a Network Model and Linear Model of a Supply Chain

Supply chains are viewed as networks of both goods and services, and knowledge and information. Their knowledge will be potential resources for new business relationship with hidden partners; however, many companies find it difficult to develop new opportunities. A recommendation of a potential partner is helpful for regional revitalization. Research into supply chains has shifted from a linear model to a network model. A network model using graph theory can topologically explain a supply chain, whereas, in a linear model, there are some differences with the real world because of a lack of information. In this study, we propose a prediction model for a new business partnership with predictors extracted from network and linear approaches used in combination for the prediction of performance and interpretability. Our dataset consisted of a network of 327,012 transactions among 131,192 companies in Northeast Japan, which was retrieved from supplier-customer relationship data provided by Teikoku Databank, Ltd. Network centralities were extracted as topological features from the network of each company. Trigram relationships were also extracted from the network motif so that the logistic flow to a company from its supplier could be used to predict customers as business partners. The results showed that the performance of the proposed model was excellent, with a high contribution of probability extracted from the trigram relationships. From this perspective, we found that the information of logistics flows is a critical factor for predicting a potential partner, even in a network model.

[1]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  The re-emergence of small-scale production: An international comparison , 1991 .

[4]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  Introduction to Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[5]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[6]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  Extraction of business relationships in supply networks using statistical learning theory , 2016, Heliyon.

[7]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[8]  Hu Guosheng,et al.  Comparison on neural networks and support vector machines in suppliers' selection , 2008 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[11]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles , 2005, Journal of statistical mechanics.

[12]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U. S. auto plants , 1991 .

[13]  Nicholas Argyres EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF FIRM CAPABILITIES IN VERTICAL INTEGRATION DECISIONS , 1996 .

[14]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[15]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[16]  Xuesong Guo,et al.  Supplier selection based on hierarchical potential support vector machine , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[18]  A. Hargadon Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[19]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[20]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN CAPITAL: THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL AND RELATIONAL LINKAGES ON FIRM EXECUTION AND INNOVATION , 2008 .

[21]  R. Hsu The MIT encyclopedia of the Japanese economy , 1994 .

[22]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[23]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[24]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Ha Hoang,et al.  Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review , 2003 .