Bayesian Factor Analysis for Mixed Ordinal and Continuous Responses

Many situations exist in which a latent construct has both ordinal and continuous indicators. This presents a problem for the applied researcher because standard measurement models are not designed to accommodate mixed ordinal and continuous data. I address this problem by formulating a measurement model that is appropriate for such mixed multivariate responses. This model unifies standard normal theory factor analysis and item response theory models for ordinal data. I detail a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for model fitting. I apply the model to cross-national data on political-economic risk and find that the model works well. Software for fitting this model is publicly available in the MCMCpack (Martin and Quinn 2004, ‘‘MCMCpack 0.4‐8’’) R package.

[1]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: CROSS‐COUNTRY TESTS USING ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES , 1995 .

[2]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[3]  Silvio Borner,et al.  Political credibility and economic development , 1995 .

[4]  K. Jöreskog A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1969 .

[5]  Fernando Limongi,et al.  ACLP Political andEconomic Database Codebook , 1999 .

[6]  W. Wong,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[7]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[8]  Mary Kathryn Cowles,et al.  Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov chain convergence for cumulative-link generalized linear models , 1996, Stat. Comput..

[9]  D. Lawley,et al.  XX.—Some New Results in Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Estimation and Inference via Bayesian Simulation: An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2000 .

[11]  Philip Keefer,et al.  New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions , 1999 .

[12]  Andrew Carl Sobel,et al.  State Institutions, Private Incentives, Global Capital , 1999 .

[13]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  A. Basilevsky,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[15]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Measurement Error and the Structure of Attitudes: Are Positive and Negative Judgments Opposites? , 1994 .

[16]  S. Chib,et al.  Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data , 1993 .

[17]  Patrick Paul Walsh,et al.  New tools in comparative political economy : the database of political institutions , 2001 .

[18]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[19]  Joshua D. Clinton,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Jim Albert,et al.  Ordinal Data Modeling , 2000 .

[21]  Jeff Gill,et al.  Bayesian Methods : A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2002 .

[22]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Politics and International Investment: Measuring Risks and Protecting Profits , 2002 .

[23]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .