On Studying the Impact of Uncertainty on Behavior Diffusion in Social Networks

Unlike traditional epidemic virus spreading, behavior diffusion in social networks is conducted by rational users, who would make strategic choices instead of being randomly infected with some probability. Specifically, individuals always try to maximize their utilities through rationally selecting specific behaviors (adopting a new product, or spreading a rumor, etc.). However, utility obtained by an individual, naturally contains uncertainty, and it may stem from two sources: users' imperfect and incomplete knowledge about others, and the inherently stochastic property in human behavior. Thus, it is imperative to model and analyze the diffusion pattern under the resulting uncertainty in social networks, which, however, has not yet been deeply examined by the existing works. This paper deeply explores the pattern of gossip diffusion in social networks when uncertainty exists in users' decision making. In detail, the innovative results provided in this paper are: first, inspired by random utility theory, we formulate the diffusion model based on mixed logit model that allows for user's uncertainty in determining whether to adopt a specific strategy; second, the formal analysis framework characterizing the diffusion process is derived through the approximation method of mean field theory; finally, we explore the extensive applicability of our proposed analysis framework through modeling rumor diffusion in social networks as a coordination game. Our findings are, for various structural characteristics, small uncertainty can significantly speed up the diffusion of gossip; furthermore, social networks with scale-free property can facilitate the gossip diffusion in the easiest way, but, the range of uncertainty factor that can maximize gossip diffusion is the smallest. The obtained results perfectly comply with the philosophical saying about rumor diffusion in real social life: easy come, easy go.

[1]  M. Jackson,et al.  Diffusion of Behavior and Equilibrium Properties in Network Games , 2007 .

[2]  Sunju Park,et al.  Determining Content Power Users in a Blog Network: An Approach and Its Applications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[3]  M. Harding,et al.  A Bayesian mixed logit-probit model for multinomial choice , 2008 .

[4]  Mahmoud Fouz,et al.  Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Dunia López-Pintado,et al.  Diffusion in complex social networks , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Modeling Users' Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar's Number , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Best-Response Strategy Revision , 1995 .

[8]  Susan Athey,et al.  Discrete Choice Models with Multiple Unobserved Choice Characteristics , 2007 .

[9]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[10]  Avigdor Gal,et al.  Efficient Processing of Uncertain Events in Rule-Based Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[11]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[12]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[13]  Dunia López-Pintado The Spread of Free-Riding Behavior in a Social Network , 2008 .

[14]  Rich Ling,et al.  Comparing and Visualizing the Social Spreading of Products on a Large Social Network , 2013, The Influence of Technology on Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[15]  Dunia López-Pintado,et al.  Contagion and coordination in random networks , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[16]  Jianhua Ma,et al.  Study on the Effect of Utility Uncertainty on Behavior Diffusion in Autonomous and Rational Networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[17]  Aviv Nevo,et al.  Empirical Models of Consumer Behavior , 2010 .

[18]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[19]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Moshe Levy,et al.  The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution , 2006 .

[21]  Marc Lelarge Diffusion and cascading behavior in random networks , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[22]  Wei Chen,et al.  Efficient influence maximization in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[23]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic thresholds in real networks , 2008, TSEC.

[24]  Krzysztof R. Apt,et al.  Choosing Products in Social Networks , 2012, WINE.

[25]  Hiroshi Morita,et al.  Agent-based modeling for the study of diffusion dynamics , 2009, SpringSim '09.

[26]  A. Plastino,et al.  Unravelling the size distribution of social groups with information theory in complex networks , 2009, 0905.3704.

[27]  Roch Guérin,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of Network Technology Adoption and the Role of Converters , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[28]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  The dynamics of social innovation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Nada Wasi,et al.  COMPARING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF HETEROGENEITY IN CONSUMER CHOICE BEHAVIOR , 2012 .