Genomic expression of mesenchymal stem cells to altered nanoscale topographies

The understanding of cellular response to the shape of their environment would be of benefit in the development of artificial extracellular environments for potential use in the production of biomimetic surfaces. Specifically, the understanding of how cues from the extracellular environment can be used to understand stem cell differentiation would be of special interest in regenerative medicine. In this paper, the genetic profile of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on two osteogenic nanoscale topographies (pitted surface versus raised islands) are compared with cells treated with dexamethasone, a corticosteroid routinely used to stimulate bone formation in culture from mesenchymal stem cells, using 19k gene microarrays as well as 101 gene arrays specific for osteoblast and endothelial biology. The current studies show that by altering the shape of the matrix a cell response (genomic profile) similar to that achieved with chemical stimulation can be elicited. Here, we show that bone formation can be achieved with efficiency similar to that of dexamethasone with the added benefit that endothelial cell development is not inhibited. We further show that the mechanism of action of the topographies and dexamethasone differs. This could have an implication for tissue engineering in which a simultaneous, targeted, development of a tissue, such as bone, without the suppression of angiogenesis to supply nutrients to the new tissue is required. The results further demonstrate that perhaps the shape of the extracellular matrix is critical to tissue development.

[1]  Duncan Sutherland,et al.  Nanomechanotransduction and Interphase Nuclear Organization influence on genomic control , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[2]  G S Stein,et al.  Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. , 1993, Endocrine reviews.

[3]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour. I. Simple step cues. , 1987, Development.

[5]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[6]  M. Arroyo-Morales,et al.  Expression of cytokines IL-4, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, and IFNγ and modulation by different growth factors in cultured human osteoblast-like cells , 2007, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[7]  P. Weiss,et al.  Shape and Movement of Mesenchyme Cells as Functions of the Physical Structure of the Medium: Contributions to a Quantitative Morphology. , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[9]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Nanotechniques and approaches in biotechnology , 2001 .

[10]  Mara Riminucci,et al.  Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells: Nature, Biology, and Potential Applications , 2001, Stem cells.

[11]  F. Guilak Compression-induced changes in the shape and volume of the chondrocyte nucleus. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Daniel Howard,et al.  Immunoselection and adenoviral genetic modulation of human osteoprogenitors: in vivo bone formation on PLA scaffold. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  A. Friedenstein Precursor cells of mechanocytes. , 1976, International review of cytology.

[14]  Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al.  Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells , 2003, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[15]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments , 2004, FEBS letters.

[16]  C. McCaig,et al.  Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[17]  M Eastwood,et al.  Fibroblast responses to mechanical forces , 1998, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[18]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[19]  David Botstein,et al.  SOURCE: a unified genomic resource of functional annotations, ontologies, and gene expression data , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[21]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[22]  M. Zaidi Molecular and cellular biology of bone , 1998 .

[23]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[24]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Biomimetic Polymer Nanostructures by Injection Molding , 2003 .

[25]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[26]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[29]  A Curtis,et al.  Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[30]  P. Bianco,et al.  Stem cells in tissue engineering , 2001, Nature.

[31]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[32]  Matthew John Dalby,et al.  Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[33]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[34]  David I. Wilson,et al.  Characterization and Multipotentiality of Human Fetal Femur–Derived Cells: Implications for Skeletal Tissue Regeneration , 2006, Stem cells.

[35]  Y. J. Kang,et al.  The role of the p38 pathway in adaptive immunity. , 2007, Cellular & molecular immunology.

[36]  R. Getzenberg,et al.  Nuclear matrix and the regulation of gene expression: Tissue specificity , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[37]  Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al.  The effects of continuous and discontinuous groove edges on cell shape and alignment. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[38]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[39]  Albert K. Harris,et al.  Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis , 1981, Nature.

[40]  A Curtis,et al.  Activation of macrophage‐like cells by multiple grooved substrata. Topographical control of cell behaviour. , 1995, Cell biology international.

[41]  P Connolly,et al.  Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[42]  W. Pan,et al.  Resveratrol enhances proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells via ER-dependent ERK1/2 activation. , 2007, Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology.

[43]  A. Curtis,et al.  CONTROL OF CELL BEHAVIOR: TOPOLOGICAL FACTORS. , 1964, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  Xuebin B. Yang,et al.  Induction of Human Osteoprogenitor Chemotaxis, Proliferation, Differentiation, and Bone Formation by Osteoblast Stimulating Factor‐1/Pleiotrophin: Osteoconductive Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Skeletal progenitor cells and ageing human populations. , 1998, Clinical science.

[46]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[47]  Mark Clements,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells , 2007, Stem Cell Reviews.

[48]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[49]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[50]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[51]  M Eastwood,et al.  Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: Mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three‐dimensional substrates , 1998, Journal of cellular physiology.

[52]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[53]  A. Wilkie Bad bones, absent smell, selfish testes: The pleiotropic consequences of human FGF receptor mutations , 2005 .