Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov

ABSTRACT Online Open Innovation (OI) platforms like Challenge.gov are used to post public sector problem statements, collect and evaluate ideas submitted by citizens with the goal to increase government innovation. Using quantitative data extracted from contests posted to Challenge.gov and qualitative interviews with thirty-six public managers in fourteen federal departments contribute to the discovery and analysis of intra-, inter, and extra-organizational factors that drive or hinder the implementation of OI in the public sector. The analysis shows that system-inherent barriers hinder public sector organizations to adopt this procedural and technological innovation. However, when the mandate of the innovation policy aligns with the mission of the organization, it opens opportunities for change in innovation acquisition and standard operating procedures.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Paul Germeraad.  The Changing Role of R&D , 2001 .

[3]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Research Note: Public and Private Managers' Perceptions of Red Tape , 1995 .

[5]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[6]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[7]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Externalities of openness in innovation , 2013 .

[8]  K. Desouza,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector : the Case of Challenge.gov , 2013 .

[9]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  Grand Innovation Prizes: A theoretical, normative, and empirical evaluation , 2012 .

[10]  S. Osborne,et al.  Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? , 2016 .

[11]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation , 2012 .

[12]  J. Andrei Villarroel.  Strategic Crowdsourcing: The Emergence of Online Distributed Innovation , 2013 .

[13]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[14]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention , 2014 .

[15]  Veronica Phillips,et al.  About the Open Government Initiative , 2015 .

[16]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[17]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods , 2015 .

[18]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  "Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations' Filtering of User Suggestions" , 2014 .

[19]  Jorg M. Elsenbach,et al.  The Changing Role of R&D Gatekeepers , 2007 .

[20]  B. Santos,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy , 1998 .

[21]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation , 2008 .

[22]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[23]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  On the Management of Open Innovation , 2014 .

[24]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice , 2014 .

[26]  Anuradha Joshi,et al.  Institutionalised Co-production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments , 2004 .

[27]  Jason Smith,et al.  The Challenges of Challenge.Gov: Adopting Private Sector Business Innovations in the Federal Government , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries , 2012 .

[29]  S. Dopson,et al.  When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health‐Care Innovation Projects , 2013 .

[30]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[31]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[32]  T. Bovaird.  Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services , 2007 .

[33]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[34]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process , 2004 .

[35]  Law.  America COMPETES Act , 2012 .

[36]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[37]  T. Little,et al.  Written Versus Unwritten Rules: The Role of Rule Formalization in Green Tape , 2013 .

[38]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[39]  Ines Mergel.  Opening Government : Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate With External Problem Solvers , 2014 .

[40]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners , 2014 .

[41]  Phech Colatat,et al.  An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA , 2015 .

[42]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[43]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[44]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  Getting Unusual Suspects to Solve R&D Puzzles , 2007 .