Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar (Tyria jacobaeae, Erebidae)

Defended prey often use distinctive, conspicuous, colours to advertise their unprofitability to potential predators (aposematism). These warning signals are frequently made up of salient, high contrast, stripes which have been hypothesized to increase the speed and accuracy of predator avoidance learning. Limitations in predator visual acuity, however, mean that these patterns cannot be resolved when viewed from a distance, and adjacent patches of colour will blend together (pattern blending). We investigated how saliency changes at different viewing distances in the toxic and brightly coloured cinnabar moth caterpillar (Tyria jacobaeae). We found that although the caterpillars' orange-and-black stripes are highly salient at close range, when viewed from a distance the colours blend together to match closely those of the background. Cinnabar caterpillars therefore produce a distance-dependent signal combining salient aposematism with targeted background matching camouflage, without necessarily compromising the size or saturation of their aposematic signal.

[1]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Using digital photography to study animal coloration , 2007 .

[2]  C. Rowe,et al.  Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration , 2014, Current Biology.

[4]  A. D. Higginson,et al.  OPTIMAL DEFENSIVE COLORATION STRATEGIES DURING THE GROWTH PERIOD OF PREY , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  C. Rowe,et al.  Ambient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey☆ , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Wilhelm Windecker Euchella (hypocrita) jacobaeae l. und das schutztrachtenproblem , 1939, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere.

[7]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the european starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  J. Mappes,et al.  From deception to frankness: Benefits of ontogenetic shift in the anti-predator strategy of alder moth Acronicta alni larvae , 2014 .

[9]  D. Jameson,et al.  An opponent-process theory of color vision. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Max Kuhn,et al.  caret: Classification and Regression Training , 2015 .

[12]  Melissa Bateson,et al.  State-dependent decision making: educated predators strategically trade off the costs and benefits of consuming aposematic prey , 2007 .

[13]  N. Marshall,et al.  Communication and camouflage with the same 'bright' colours in reef fishes. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  J. Endler,et al.  Predator Mixes and the Conspicuousness of Aposematic Signals , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Stripes for warning and stripes for hiding: spatial frequency and detection distance , 2017 .

[16]  M. Stevens,et al.  Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  F. Varela,et al.  Ways of coloring: Comparative color vision as a case study for cognitive science , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  D. Papaj,et al.  Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast, and the benefits of conspicuousness , 2007 .

[20]  T. Goldsmith,et al.  Color vision of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): hue matches, tetrachromacy, and intensity discrimination , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  C. D. Jones,et al.  Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  R. Menzel,et al.  The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  A. Kelber Colour in the eye of the beholder: receptor sensitivities and neural circuits underlying colour opponency and colour perception , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Almut Kelber,et al.  The spatial tuning of achromatic and chromatic vision in budgerigars. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[25]  G. Gamberale-Stille Benefit by contrast: an experiment with live aposematic prey , 2001 .

[26]  Jacqualine B. Grant Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[27]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .

[28]  C. Rowe,et al.  Predators' Toxin Burdens Influence Their Strategic Decisions to Eat Toxic Prey , 2007, Current Biology.

[29]  M. Bateson,et al.  Educated predators make strategic decisions to eat defended prey according to their toxin content , 2012 .

[30]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage , 2016, Biology Letters.

[31]  M. Théry,et al.  Avian Color Vision and Coloration: Multidisciplinary Evolutionary Biology , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[32]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Poisonous Alkaloids in the Body Tissues of the Cinnabar Moth (Callimorpha jacobaeae L.) , 1968, Nature.

[33]  J. Endler,et al.  The complex business of survival by aposematism. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  S. Merilaita,et al.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Animal colour vision — behavioural tests and physiological concepts , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  D. Hunt,et al.  Avian Visual Pigments: Characteristics, Spectral Tuning, and Evolution , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[37]  Sami Merilaita,et al.  The effect of signal appearance and distance on detection risk in an aposematic butterfly larva (Parnassius apollo) , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[39]  J. Mottram 49. Some Observations on Pattern‐Blending with reference to Obliterative Shading and Concealment of Outline. , 2010 .

[40]  Innes C Cuthill,et al.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.