The eye of the beholder: designing the OWL

Preliminary requirements and possible technological solutions for the next generation of ground-based optical telescopes were laid down at ESO in 1998. Since then, a phase A study has been commissioned, the objective of which is to produce a conceptual design compatible, to the maximum possible extent, with proven technology, and establish realistic plans for detailed design, site selection, construction and operation for a 100-m class optical, diffraction-limited telescope. There was no doubt about how daunting such a challenge would be, but, somewhat surprisingly, it turns out to be firmly confined to adaptive optics concepts and technologies. The telescope itself appears to be feasible within the allocated budget and without reliance on exotic assumptions. Fabrication of key subsystems is fully within the reach of a properly engineered, industrialized process. A consolidated baseline is taking shape, and alternative system and subsystem solutions are being explored, strengthening the confidence that requirements could be met. Extensive development of wavefront measurement techniques enlarges the palette of solutions available for active wavefront control of a segmented, active telescope. At system level, ESO is developing enabling experiments to validate multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MAD for Multi-conjugate Adaptive optics Demonstrator) and telescope wavefront control (APE, for Active Phasing Experiment).

[1]  Jesus J. Fuensalida,et al.  Piston detection of a segmented mirror telescope using a curvature sensor: preliminary results with numerical simulations , 1997, Other Conferences.

[2]  Catherine Mayumi Ohara,et al.  Phasing the primary mirror segments of the Keck telescopes: a comparison of different techniques , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[3]  Philippe Dierickx Optical Design and adaptive optics properties of the OWL 100-m telescope , 2002 .

[4]  Aziz Ziad,et al.  Measurements of the wavefront outer scale at Paranal: influence of this parameter in interferometry , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[5]  R. Ragazzoni Pupil plane wavefront sensing with an oscillating prism , 1996 .

[6]  Daniele Gallieni,et al.  LBT adaptive secondary preliminary design , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[7]  Marc S. Sarazin,et al.  New tools for a global survey of potential sites for the future giant telescopes , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  The Layer-Oriented Wavefront Sensor for MAD , 2004 .

[9]  J. Mariotti,et al.  Pathlength stability of synthetic aperture telescopes - The case of the 25 CM CERGA interferometer , 1984 .

[11]  Enzo Brunetto,et al.  OWL: further steps in designing the telescope mechanical structure and in assessing its performance , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  MAD the ESO multi-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[13]  A. Agabi,et al.  Optical parameters relevant for High Angular Resolution at Paranal from GSM instrument and surface layer contribution , 2000 .

[14]  Philippe Dierickx,et al.  OWL optical design, active optics, and error budget , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[15]  Torben Andersen,et al.  The proposed 50 m Swedish Extremely Large Telescope , 2000 .

[16]  Philippe Dierickx,et al.  OWL concept study. , 2000 .

[17]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[18]  Christophe Dupuy,et al.  Adaptive optics projects at ESO , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  L. D. Barr Factors Influencing Selection Of A Next Generation Telescope Concept , 1979, Other Conferences.

[20]  Philippe Dierickx,et al.  Phasing ELTs for Adaptive Optics: Preliminary results of a Comparison of techniques , 2002 .

[21]  Kjetil Dohlen,et al.  Diffraction in OWL: Effects of segmentation and segments edge misfigure , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[22]  Kjetil Dohlen,et al.  Mach Zender wavefront sensor for phasing of segmented telescopes , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[23]  Lothar Noethe,et al.  OWL wind loading characterization: a preliminary study , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[24]  C. Matt Mountain,et al.  What is beyond the current generation of groundbased 8-m to 10-m class telescopes and the VLT-I? , 1997, Other Conferences.

[25]  Enrico Fedrigo,et al.  Layer-oriented single- and dual-field-of-view performance for OWL , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[26]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Layer-oriented wavefront sensor for MAD: status and progress report , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[27]  L. Montoya,et al.  Phasing segmented mirrors: a modification of the Keck narrow-band technique and its application to extremely large telescopes. , 2002, Applied optics.

[28]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Future of filled aperture telescopes: is a 100-m feasible? , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[29]  Franz Koch,et al.  Friction drive and bogies for OWL's main axes, technological step backwards or cost effective alternative? , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[30]  Aden Baker Meinel An overview of the technological possibilities of future telescopes. , 1978 .

[31]  Philippe Dierickx,et al.  OWL CONCEPT OVERVIEW , 1999 .

[32]  John Davis,et al.  Atmospheric path variations for baselines up to 80m measured with the Sydney University Stellar Interferometer , 1995 .

[33]  Valeri G. Orlov,et al.  Co-phasing of segmented mirror telescopes with curvature sensing , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[34]  Norbert N. Hubin,et al.  Results of AO simulations for ELTs , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[35]  L. D. Barr Factors Influencing Selection Of A Next-Generation Telescope Concept , 1979 .