Distributed Prognostics Based on Structural Model Decomposition

Within systems health management, prognostics focuses on predicting the remaining useful life of a system. In the model-based prognostics paradigm, physics-based models are constructed that describe the operation of a system, and how it fails. Such approaches consist of an estimation phase, in which the health state of the system is first identified, and a prediction phase, in which the health state is projected forward in time to determine the end of life. Centralized solutions to these problems are often computationally expensive, do not scale well as the size of the system grows, and introduce a single point of failure. In this paper, we propose a novel distributed model-based prognostics scheme that formally describes how to decompose both the estimation and prediction problems into computationally-independent local subproblems whose solutions may be easily composed into a global solution. The decomposition of the prognostics problem is achieved through structural decomposition of the underlying models. The decomposition algorithm creates from the global system model a set of local submodels suitable for prognostics. Computationally independent local estimation and prediction problems are formed based on these local submodels, resulting in a scalable distributed prognostics approach that allows the local subproblems to be solved in parallel, thus offering increases in computational efficiency. Using a centrifugal pump as a case study, we perform a number of simulation-based experiments to demonstrate the distributed approach, compare the performance with a centralized approach, and establish its scalability.

[1]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  I. Hutchings Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials , 1992 .

[3]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A Kalman Filter-Based Ensemble Approach With Application to Turbine Creep Prognostics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[4]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  Distributed Damage Estimation for Prognostics based on Structural Model Decomposition , 2011 .

[5]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Model-Based Prognostic Techniques Applied to a Suspension System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  Indranil Roychoudhury,et al.  A structural model decomposition framework for systems health management , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[8]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  A Model-based Prognostics Methodology for Electrolytic Capacitors Based on Electrical Overstress Accelerated Aging , 2011 .

[9]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  Model-based prognostics under limited sensing , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[10]  A.A. Ferri,et al.  An Intelligent Diagnostic/Prognostic Framework for Automotive Electrical Systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[11]  Pradeep Lall,et al.  Extended Kalman Filter models and resistance spectroscopy for prognostication and health monitoring of leadfree electronics under vibration , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[12]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Model-Based Prognostics With Concurrent Damage Progression Processes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[13]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  A Decomposition Method for Nonlinear Parameter Estimation in TRANSCEND , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[14]  A. Wolfram,et al.  Component-based multi-model approach for fault detection and diagnosis of a centrifugal pump , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[15]  Carsten Skovmose Kallesøe,et al.  Fault Detection and Isolation in Centrifugal Pumps , 2005 .

[16]  K. Goebel,et al.  Improving Computational Efficiency of Prediction in Model-Based Prognostics Using the Unscented Transform , 2010 .

[17]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  Metrics for Offline Evaluation of Prognostic Performance , 2021, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management.

[18]  George J. Vachtsevanos,et al.  A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis , 2009 .

[19]  Hai Qiu,et al.  Physics-based Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Aircraft Engine Bearing Prognosis , 2009 .

[20]  Marcos Eduardo Orchard,et al.  A Particle Filtering-based Framework for On-line Fault Diagnosis and Failure Prognosis , 2007 .

[21]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[22]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Modeling Li-ion Battery Capacity Depletion in a Particle Filtering Framework , 2009 .

[23]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  H. A. Thompson PARALLEL PROCESSING ARCHITECTURES FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS , 1993 .

[25]  G. Biswas,et al.  PHM Integration with Maintenance and Inventory Management Systems , 2006, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[26]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  A Model-Based Prognostics Approach Applied to Pneumatic Valves , 2011 .

[27]  Teresa Escobet,et al.  Diagnosability Analysis Based on Component-Supported Analytical Redundancy Relations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[28]  Tohru Katayama,et al.  Subspace Methods for System Identification , 2005 .

[29]  M. Viberg Subspace-based state-space system identification , 2002 .

[30]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  A Distributed Prognostic Health Management Architecture , 2009 .

[31]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  Applying Model-Based Diagnosis to a Rapid Propellant Loading System (Postprint) , 2009 .

[32]  Carlos Alonso González,et al.  Possible conflicts: a compilation technique for consistency-based diagnosis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[33]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Decompositional, Model-based Learning and its Analogy to Diagnosis , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[34]  Matthew Daigle,et al.  An Efficient Deterministic Approach to Model-based Prediction Uncertainty Estimation , 2012 .

[35]  Michael A. West,et al.  Combined Parameter and State Estimation in Simulation-Based Filtering , 2001, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice.

[36]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Factoring Dynamic Bayesian Networks based on structural observability , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[37]  M. Staroswiecki,et al.  ANALYTICAL REDUNDANCY IN NON LINEAR INTERCONNECTED SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[38]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control , 2006 .

[39]  F. Daum Nonlinear filters: beyond the Kalman filter , 2005, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[40]  K. Goebel,et al.  Analytical algorithms to quantify the uncertainty in remaining useful life prediction , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[41]  B. Saha,et al.  A comparison of filter-based approaches for model-based prognostics , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[42]  G. Biswas,et al.  A Hierarchical Model-based approach to Systems Health Management , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[43]  Mattias Krysander,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Finding Minimal Overconstrained Subsystems for Model-Based Diagnosis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[44]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  Distributed prognostic health management with gaussian process regression , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.