Frontier Technology, Absorptive Capacity and Distance

Recent literature on international technology diffusion has demonstrated the positive effect in foreign country productivity on the domestic economy. Using a sample of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) manufacturing industries we search for evidence that the effect of this foreign technology varies according to the level of absorptive capacity and physical distance. We find evidence that both help to explain differences in the level of productivity across countries, but that absorptive capacity is quantitatively more important. Physical distance had a greater effect at the start of the time period and in industries in which trade is local and technology is high-tech.

[1]  J. Eaton,et al.  International Patenting and Technology Diffusion , 1994 .

[2]  Ellen R. McGrattan,et al.  Explaining cross-country income differences , 1999 .

[3]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  North-South R & D Spillovers , 1997 .

[4]  Á. D. L. Fuente,et al.  HUMAN CAPITAL IN GROWTH REGRESSIONS: HOW MUCH DIFFERENCE DOES DATA QUALITY MAKE? ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPERS NO. 262 , 2000 .

[5]  W. Easterly,et al.  It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models , 2001 .

[6]  A. Krueger How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984-1989 , 1991 .

[7]  K. Arrow Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge , 1969 .

[8]  W. Keller The Geography and Channels of Diffusion at the World's Technology Frontier , 2001 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[10]  Anthony J. Venables,et al.  Geography and International Inequalities: The Impact of New Technologies* , 2001 .

[11]  Van Ark Britain's productivity performance 1950-1996 , 2001 .

[12]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates , 1994 .

[13]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity Growth at the Industry Level: Is There Still a Relationship? , 1998 .

[14]  J. Tinbergen Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , 1964 .

[15]  W. Roeger Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Anthony J. Venables,et al.  Economic Geography and International Inequality , 2001 .

[17]  W. Easterly,et al.  What Have We Learned from a Decade of Empirical Research on Growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models , 2001 .

[18]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  Mark-Up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries: Estimates for 14 OECD Countries , 1996 .

[19]  Stephen M. Miller,et al.  The effects of openness, trade orientation, and human capital on total factor productivity , 2000 .

[20]  T. Bresnahan Computerisation and Wage Dispersion: An Analytical Reinterpretation , 1999 .

[21]  R. Barro,et al.  International Data on Educational Attainment Updates and Implications , 2000 .

[22]  R. Domènech,et al.  Instituto de Análisis Económico (CSIC) and , 2000 .

[23]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[24]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. , 1991 .

[25]  Walter G. Park,et al.  INTERNATIONAL R&D SPILLOVERS AND OECD ECONOMIC GROWTH , 1995 .

[26]  D. Pilat Labour Productivity Levels in OECD Countries: Estimates for Manufacturing and Selected Service Sectors , 1996 .

[27]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  Needed: a theory of total factor productivity , 1998 .

[28]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[29]  Chris Papageorgiou,et al.  Technology Adoption, Human Capital, and Growth Theory , 2002 .

[30]  M. Abramovitz Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[31]  W. Beckerman,et al.  Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade , 1956 .

[32]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[33]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[34]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[35]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  International Trade Theory: The Evidence , 1994 .

[37]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[38]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[39]  Bin Xu,et al.  Multinational Enterprises, Technology Diffusion, and Host Country Productivity Growth , 2000 .

[40]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? , 1998 .

[41]  W. Baumol Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-run Data Show , 1985 .

[42]  F. Mauro The Impact of Economic Integration on FDI and Exports: A Gravity Approach. CEPS Working Document No. 156, November 2000 , 2000 .

[43]  M. Paul,et al.  ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1990 .

[44]  Edward Leamer,et al.  U.S. Manufacturing and an Emerging Mexico , 1993 .

[45]  Stephen L. Parente,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  Abdelhak S. Senhadji Sources of Economic Growth: An Extensive Growth Accounting Exercise , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Ellen R. McGrattan,et al.  Chapter 10 Explaining cross-country income differences , 1999 .

[48]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  The Economic Geography of the Internet Age , 2001 .

[49]  J. Eaton,et al.  Engines of Growth: Domestic and Foreign Sources of Innovation , 1995 .