The refined ORCS approach: A catch-based method for estimating stock status and catch limits for data-poor fish stocks

Abstract The ‘Only Reliable Catch Stocks’ (ORCS) Working Group approach to data-poor fisheries stock status and catch limit estimation has been used by U.S. fisheries managers but has yet to be fully evaluated. The ORCS approach estimates stock status using a fourteen question ‘Table of Attributes’ and the overfishing limit by multiplying a historical catch statistic by a scalar based on the estimated status. We evaluated the performance of the approach by applying it to 193 stocks with data-rich stock assessments and comparing its predictions of stock status with the assessment model estimates. The approach classified all but three stocks as fully exploited indicating that it is a poor predictor of status and should not be used by managers. We refined the original ORCS approach by: (1) developing a more predictive model of stock status using boosted classification trees and (2) identifying the historical catch statistics and scalars that best estimate overfishing limits using assessment model data. The refined ORCS approach correctly classified 74% of all stocks and 62% of overexploited stocks in a training dataset and 74% of all stocks and 50% of overexploited stocks in an independent test dataset. The refined approach performed better than six other widely used catch-only methods. However, the overfishing limits estimated by the refined approach would further deplete overexploited stocks without the use of conservative catch scalars to buffer against classification uncertainty. Conservative catch scalars can reduce the probability of overfishing below 50%, the U.S. legal maximum, but with concomitant increases in the probability and magnitude of underfishing. The refined ORCS approach may therefore be useful when other methods are not possible or appropriate and some risk of underfishing is acceptable.

[1]  H. Toutenburg Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York‐London‐Sydney‐Toronto 1973. XIII, 233 S. , 1974 .

[2]  Alec D. MacCall,et al.  Depletion-corrected average catch: a simple formula for estimating sustainable yields in data-poor situations , 2009 .

[3]  Osio Giacomo Chato,et al.  DEVELOPING NEW APPROACHES TO GLOBAL STOCK STATUS ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF THE SEAS , 2014 .

[4]  O. Jensen,et al.  Resilience and Recovery of Overexploited Marine Populations , 2013, Science.

[5]  James T. Thorson,et al.  Using model-based inference to evaluate global fisheries status from landings, location, and life history data , 2012 .

[6]  Elizabeth N. Brooks,et al.  When “data” are not data: the pitfalls of post hoc analyses that use stock assessment model output , 2015 .

[7]  Luiz Barbieri,et al.  Calculating Acceptable Biological Catch for Stocks That Have Reliable Catch Data Only: Only Reliable Catch Stocks - Orcs , 2013 .

[8]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  Fisheries Ecology and Management , 2004 .

[9]  Jim Berkson,et al.  Current methods for setting catch limits for data-limited fish stocks in the United States , 2015 .

[10]  J. Gulland,et al.  The fish resources of the ocean , 1971 .

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  André E. Punt,et al.  Evaluating the performance of data-moderate and catch-only assessment methods for U.S. west coast groundfish , 2015 .

[14]  Richard M. Methot,et al.  Biodiversity Loss in the Ocean: How Bad Is It? , 2007, Science.

[15]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Status and Solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries , 2012, Science.

[16]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Contrasting Global Trends in Marine Fishery Status Obtained from Catches and from Stock Assessments , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Rainer Froese,et al.  Using global catch data for inferences on the world's marine fisheries , 2013 .

[18]  M. Wilberg,et al.  An Evaluation of Harvest Control Rules for Data-Poor Fisheries , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Fisheries: Does catch reflect abundance? , 2013, Nature.

[20]  K. Cochrane,et al.  Overview of World Status of Data-Limited Fisheries: Inferences from Landings Statistics , 2005 .

[21]  Rainer Froese,et al.  Impact of fishing on the abundance of marine species , 2002 .

[22]  Alec D. MacCall,et al.  Depletion-Based Stock Reduction Analysis: A catch-based method for determining sustainable yields for data-poor fish stocks , 2011 .

[23]  J. Thorson,et al.  The determination of data-poor catch limits in the United States: is there a better way? , 2015 .

[24]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[25]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Reflections on the success of traditional fisheries management , 2014 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[27]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[28]  Cóilín Minto,et al.  Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database , 2012 .

[29]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Evaluating methods that classify fisheries stock status using only fisheries catch data , 2012 .

[30]  S. Martell,et al.  A simple method for estimating MSY from catch and resilience , 2013 .

[31]  Jason M. Cope Implementing a statistical catch-at-age model (Stock Synthesis) as a tool for deriving overfishing limits in data-limited situations , 2013 .

[32]  Malin L. Pinsky,et al.  Unexpected patterns of fisheries collapse in the world's oceans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  Sean C. Anderson,et al.  Improving estimates of population status and trend with superensemble models , 2017 .

[35]  André E. Punt,et al.  Evaluating methods for setting catch limits in data-limited fisheries , 2014 .

[36]  R. Watson,et al.  Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Thorson,et al.  A new role for effort dynamics in the theory of harvested populations and data-poor stock assessment , 2013 .