Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro.

This study was undertaken to measure the ultrasound (US)-mediated cavitation threshold of microdroplets as a function of its content and US parameters (frequency, amplitude and burst length). Albumin-coated droplets were prepared with perfluoropropane, perfluorohexane or perfluoromethylcyclohexane contents. The filtered suspensions were diluted to 1:1000 (v) and compared with Optison. The formulations were injected into an acoustically transparent vessel and sonicated with a single focused transducer. The frequencies employed were 0.74, 1.1, 2.18 and 3.3 MHz and the burst length and acoustic pressure were varied. The inertial cavitation threshold for each experiment was monitored through passive acoustic detection. The formation of droplet emulsion of the perfluorocarbon increased the natural boiling point of the perfluorocarbon. However, perfluorocarbon droplets having contents with higher molecular weights and boiling points did not have detectably higher inertial cavitation thresholds and, thus, the droplets do not need to be in a superheated state to be cavitated by US bursts. Therefore, higher boiling point perfluorocarbons should be investigated for this purpose and may prove to be useful for both imaging and therapy. The inertial cavitation threshold of perfluorocarbon droplets increases with frequency, and was approximately 0.7 MPa at 0.74 MHz and 1.75 MPa at 3.3 MHz. Optison, already in a gaseous state, has the lowest cavitation threshold of all formulations studied. Results show that, for the frequencies tested, there is no dependence between inertial cavitation threshold and burst lengths between 20 and 100 ms. As a conclusion, the inertial cavitation threshold of albumin-coated microdroplets of several perfluorocarbons was determined in vitro. The results indicate that the physical properties of these droplets are such that they may be useful for localized US therapies.

[1]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  H. Christenson,et al.  Cavitation and the Interaction Between Macroscopic Hydrophobic Surfaces , 1988, Science.

[3]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Test for kidney hemorrhage following exposure to intense, pulsed ultrasound. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  L. Crum,et al.  Thresholds for inertial cavitation in Albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  C. Church,et al.  Spontaneous homogeneous nucleation, inertial cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  D. Crossman,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[10]  K. Takei,et al.  Utilization of liposomes in vesicular transport studies. , 2002, Cell structure and function.

[11]  T. Porter,et al.  Thrombolytic enhancement with perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles. , 1996, American heart journal.

[12]  E. Unger,et al.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[13]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[14]  S. Wickline,et al.  Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  D. Miller,et al.  Bubble cycling as the explanation of the promotion of ultrasonic cavitation in a rotating tube exposure system. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Lithotripter shock waves with cavitation nucleation agents produce tumor growth reduction and gene transfer in vivo. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  E. G. Tickner,et al.  Why do the lungs clear ultrasonic contrast? , 1980, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Stabilizing effects of caprylate and acetyltryptophanate on heat-induced aggregation of bovine serum albumin. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  An acoustic backscattering technique for the detection of transient cavitation produced by microsecond pulses of ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R S Meltzer,et al.  Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.