A Bayesian Framework for Intent Detection and Stimulation Selection in SSVEP BCIs

Currently, many Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) classifiers output point estimates of user intent which make it difficult to incorporate context prior information or assign a principled confidence measurement to a decision. We propose a Bayesian framework to extend current Steady State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) classifiers to a maximum a posteriori (MAP) classifiers by using a Kernel Density Estimate (KDE) to learn the distribution of features conditioned on stimulation class. To demonstrate our framework we extend Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) and Power Spectral Density (PSD) style methods. Traditionally, in either example, the class is estimated as the class associated with the maximum feature. Our framework increases performance by relaxing the assumption that a stimulation class's sample often maximizes its class-associated feature. Further, by leveraging the KDE, we present a method which estimates the performance of a classifier under different stimulation frequency sets. Using this, we optimize the selection of stimulation frequencies from those present in a training set.

[1]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[2]  Murat Akcakaya,et al.  Language-Model Assisted Brain Computer Interface for Typing: A Comparison of Matrix and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Yan Wang,et al.  Visual stimulus design for high-rate SSVEP BCI , 2010 .

[4]  Bo Hong,et al.  The SSVEP topographic scalp maps by Canonical correlation analysis , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Enhancing the classification accuracy of steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain–computer interfaces using phase constrained canonical correlation analysis , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Tommi Nykopp,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues for The Adaptive Brain Interface , 2001 .

[8]  Luzheng Bi,et al.  A SSVEP brain-computer interface with the hybrid stimuli of SSVEP and P300 , 2013, 2013 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[9]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  Brian Roark,et al.  RSVP keyboard: An EEG based typing interface , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[11]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[13]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[14]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Murat Akcakaya,et al.  Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2014, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  G.E. Birch,et al.  Is Information Transfer Rate a Suitable Performance Measure for Self-paced Brain Interface Systems? , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology.

[17]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  A four-choice hybrid P300/SSVEP BCI for improved accuracy , 2014 .

[18]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Canonical Correlation Analysis: An Overview with Application to Learning Methods , 2004, Neural Computation.

[19]  Peng Yuan,et al.  A study of the existing problems of estimating the information transfer rate in online brain–computer interfaces , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Frequency Recognition in SSVEP-Based BCI using Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[21]  A. Nijholt,et al.  A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges , 2014 .

[22]  G. G. Molina Towards a Practical Brain-Computer Interface , 2007 .

[23]  Maja Stikic,et al.  EEG-based classification of positive and negative affective states , 2014 .

[24]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  L1-Regularized Multiway Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled. , 2003, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[27]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  The Hybrid BCI , 2010, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[28]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Optimal visual stimuli on LCD screens for SSVEP based brain-computer interfaces , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.