An integrated approach to human reliability analysis — decision analytic dynamic reliability model

Abstract The reliability of human operators in process control is sensitive to the context. In many contemporary human reliability analysis (HRA) methods, this is not sufficiently taken into account. The aim of this article is that integration between probabilistic and psychological approaches in human reliability should be attempted. This is achieved first, by adopting such methods that adequately reflect the essential features of the process control activity, and secondly, by carrying out an interactive HRA process. Description of the activity context, probabilistic modeling, and psychological analysis form an iterative interdisciplinary sequence of analysis in which the results of one sub-task maybe input to another. The analysis of the context is carried out first with the help of a common set of conceptual tools. The resulting descriptions of the context promote the probabilistic modeling, through which new results regarding the probabilistic dynamics can be achieved. These can be incorporated in the context descriptions used as reference in the psychological analysis of actual performance. The results also provide new knowledge of the constraints of activity, by providing information of the premises of the operator’s actions. Finally, the stochastic marked point process model gives a tool, by which psychological methodology may be interpreted and utilized for reliability analysis.

[1]  A. J. Spurgin,et al.  Systematic Human Action Reliability Procedure (SHARP) , 1984 .

[2]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou,et al.  Probabilistic safety assessment and management '96 : ESREL '96--PSAM-III, June 24-28, 1996, Crete, Greece , 1996 .

[3]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[4]  R E Hall,et al.  Post-event human decision errors: operator action tree/time reliability correlation , 1982 .

[5]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A methodology for modeling operator errors of commission in probabilistic risk assessment , 1994 .

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Preface to the Cambridge University Press Edition , 1993 .

[7]  Leena Norros.  An orientation-based approach to expertise , 1995 .

[8]  R. Harré,et al.  The Discursive Mind , 1994 .

[9]  J. N. O'Brien,et al.  Multiple-sequential failure model: evaluation of and procedures for human error dependency , 1985 .

[10]  U M Klemola,et al.  Methodological considerations in analysing anaesthetists' habits of action in clinical situations. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[11]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[12]  Jan Holmberg,et al.  Marked point process framework for living probabilistic safety assessment and risk follow-up , 1995 .

[13]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control , 1994 .

[14]  G. Casella,et al.  Explaining the Gibbs Sampler , 1992 .

[15]  Arthur I. Siegel,et al.  The Maintenance Personnel Performance Simulation (MAPPS) Model1 , 1984 .

[16]  U M Klemola,et al.  Analysis of the clinical behaviour of anaesthetists: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice , 1997, Medical education.

[17]  E. M. Dougherty,et al.  Human reliability analysis - where shouldst thou turn? , 1990 .

[18]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[19]  G. W. Parry,et al.  A process for application of ATHEANA - a new HRA method , 1996 .

[20]  G. Apostolakis.  Probabilistic safety assessment and management : proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM) held February 4-7, 1991, in Beverly Hills, California , 1991 .

[21]  Melanie J. Norton.  Expertise and technology, cognition and human‐computer cooperation , 1996 .

[22]  P. C. Cacciabue.  Cognitive modelling: A fundamental issue for human reliability assessment methodology? , 1992 .

[23]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Reliability analysis and operator modelling , 1996 .

[24]  David Woods,et al.  Behind human error : cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight : state-of-the-art report , 1994 .