Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals.

BACKGROUND Surveillance is an essential element of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. Few studies have evaluated the long-term effect of these programmes. AIM To present data from a 13-year multicentre SSI surveillance programme from western and southern Switzerland. METHODS Surveillance with post-discharge follow-up was performed according to the US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system methods. SSI rates were calculated for each surveyed type of surgery, overall and by year of participation in the programme. Risk factors for SSI and the effect of surveillance time on SSI rates were analysed by multiple logistic regression. FINDINGS Overall SSI rates were 18.2% after 7411 colectomies, 6.4% after 6383 appendicectomies, 2.3% after 7411 cholecystectomies, 1.7% after 9933 herniorrhaphies, 1.6% after 6341 hip arthroplasties, and 1.3% after 3667 knee arthroplasties. The frequency of SSI detected after discharge varied between 21% for colectomy and 94% for knee arthroplasty. Independent risk factors for SSI differed between operations. The NNIS risk index was predictive of SSI in gastrointestinal surgery only. Laparoscopic technique was protective overall, but associated with higher rates of organ-space infections after appendicectomy. The duration of participation in the surveillance programme was not associated with a decreased SSI rate for any of the included procedure. CONCLUSION These data confirm the effect of post-discharge surveillance on SSI rates and the protective effect of laparoscopy. There is a need to establish alternative case-mix adjustment methods. In contrast to other European programmes, no positive impact of surveillance duration on SSI rates was observed.

[1]  Vinh Q Nguyen,et al.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[2]  Hong‐Lin Chen,et al.  Obesity and surgical site infections risk in orthopedics: a meta-analysis. , 2013, International journal of surgery.

[3]  B. Yangco,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. , 1989, American journal of infection control.

[4]  H Rüden,et al.  Reduction of Surgical Site Infection Rates Associated With Active Surveillance , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Agreement among Healthcare Professionals in Ten European Countries in Diagnosing Case-Vignettes of Surgical-Site Infections , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  J M Hughes,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. , 1988, American journal of infection control.

[7]  R. Gaynes,et al.  Does Using a Laparoscopic Approach to Cholecystectomy Decrease the Risk of Surgical Site Infection? , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[8]  W J Martone,et al.  Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  S. van den Hof,et al.  Trends in the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in The Netherlands , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[10]  E. P. Dellinger,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  Michael J. Kim,et al.  Balancing the Risk of Postoperative Surgical Infections: A Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated With Laparoscopic Appendectomy From the NSQIP Database , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[12]  S. van den Hof,et al.  Validation of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in The Netherlands , 2007, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[13]  D. Rowland,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[14]  F. V. van Tiel,et al.  Surgical site infections: how high are the costs? , 2009, The Journal of hospital infection.

[15]  J. Wille,et al.  Surgical site infection surveillance and the predictive power of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance index as compared with alternative determinants in The Netherlands , 2008 .

[16]  J. Fabry,et al.  Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system. , 2009, The Journal of hospital infection.

[17]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[18]  W R Jarvis,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[19]  R. Gaynes,et al.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. , 1992, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[20]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Improved Risk Adjustment for Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Rates , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[21]  C. Mariette,et al.  Advanced Tumor Stage Is an Independent Risk Factor of Postoperative Infectious Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Arguments From a Case-Matched Series , 2013, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  J. Reilly,et al.  Procedure-Specific Surgical Site Infection Rates and Postdischarge Surveillance in Scotland , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[23]  A. Wu,et al.  Public reporting of healthcare-associated infection data in Europe. What are the views of infection prevention opinion leaders? , 2013, The Journal of hospital infection.

[24]  H. Rüden,et al.  Ten years of KISS: the most important requirements for success. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[25]  O. Lyytikäinen,et al.  Impact of Postdischarge Surveillance on the Rate of Surgical Site Infection After Orthopedic Surgery , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[26]  S. Weber,et al.  Predictive Factors for the Development of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit Patients After Surgery , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[27]  V. Haley,et al.  Use of Administrative Data in Efficient Auditing of Hospital-Acquired Surgical Site Infections, New York State 2009–2010 , 2012, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[28]  P. Francioli,et al.  Laparoscope Use and Surgical Site Infections in Digestive Surgery , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[29]  Michele Diana,et al.  Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[30]  Helen Burstin,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[31]  B. Schirmer,et al.  A Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic and Open Ventral Hernia Repair at a Tertiary Care Center , 2012, The American surgeon.

[32]  Stephan Harbarth,et al.  Use of benchmarking and public reporting for infection control in four high-income countries. , 2011, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[33]  P. Gastmeier,et al.  Intra-abdominal Abscesses and Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomies , 2009, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[34]  E. Bernasconi,et al.  Overall Burden of Healthcare-Associated Infections Among Surgical Patients: Results of a National Study , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[35]  Michael C. Mosier,et al.  Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Kelly D Peterson,et al.  National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. , 2008, American journal of infection control.

[37]  D. Sessler,et al.  Antenatal Betamethasone and Incidence of Neonatal Respiratory Distress After Elective Caesarean Section: Pragmatic Randomized Trial , 2005, JAMA.

[38]  S. van den Hof,et al.  Impact of Postdischarge Surveillance on Surgical Site Infection Rates for Several Surgical Procedures Results From the Nosocomial Surveillance Network in The Netherlands , 2006, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[39]  R. Haley,et al.  The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[40]  Yong-feng Liu,et al.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2010, BMC gastroenterology.

[41]  W J Martone,et al.  National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. , 1991, American journal of infection control.

[42]  T. Perneger,et al.  Scoring system to predict the risk of surgical‐site infection after colorectal resection , 2012, The British journal of surgery.