Enumerating Infeasibility: Finding Multiple MUSes Quickly

Methods for analyzing infeasible constraint sets have proliferated in the past decade, commonly focused on finding maximal satisfiable subsets (MSSes) or minimal unsatisfiable subsets (MUSes). Most common are methods for producing a single such subset (one MSS or one MUS), while a few algorithms have been presented for enumerating all of the interesting subsets of a constraint set. In the case of enumerating MUSes, the existing algorithms all fall short of the best methods for producing a single MUS; that is, none come close to the ideals of 1) producing the first output as quickly as a state-of-the-art single-MUS algorithm and 2) finding each successive MUS after a similar delay. In this work, we present a novel algorithm, applicable to any type of constraint system, that enumerates MUSes in this fashion. In fact, it is structured such that one can easily ”plug in” any new single-MUS algorithm as a black box to immediately match advances in that area. We perform a detailed experimental analysis of the new algorithm’s performance relative to existing MUS enumeration algorithms, and we show that it avoids some severe intractability issues encountered by the others while outperforming them in the task of quickly enumerating MUSes.

[1]  Karem A. Sakallah,et al.  Generalizing Core-Guided Max-SAT , 2009, SAT.

[2]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Diagnosing Multiple Faults , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Joao Marques-Silva,et al.  Algorithms for Maximum Satisfiability using Unsatisfiable Cores , 2008, 2008 Design, Automation and Test in Europe.

[4]  Karem A. Sakallah,et al.  On Finding All Minimally Unsatisfiable Subformulas , 2005, SAT.

[5]  Joyce van Loon Irreducibly inconsistent systems of linear inequalities , 1981 .

[6]  Karem A. Sakallah,et al.  Algorithms for Computing Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets of Constraints , 2007, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[7]  Sharad Malik,et al.  On Solving the Partial MAX-SAT Problem , 2006, SAT.

[8]  Armin Biere,et al.  Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2006, 9th International Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, August 12-15, 2006, Proceedings , 2006, SAT.

[9]  Alberto Bugarín,et al.  Current Topics in Artificial Intelligence, 11th Conference of the Spanish Association for Artificial Intelligence, CAEPIA 2005, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, November 16-18, 2005, Revised Selected Papers , 2006, CAEPIA.

[10]  Aimin Hou,et al.  A Theory of Measurement in Diagnosis from First Principles , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Niklas Sörensson,et al.  An Extensible SAT-solver , 2003, SAT.

[12]  James Bailey,et al.  Discovery of Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets of Constraints Using Hitting Set Dualization , 2005, PADL.

[13]  Shie-Jue Lee,et al.  Deriving minimal conflict sets by CS-trees with mark set in diagnosis from first principles , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[14]  Oliver Kullmann,et al.  Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2009, 12th International Conference, SAT 2009, Swansea, UK, June 30 - July 3, 2009. Proceedings , 2009, SAT.

[15]  Joao Marques-Silva,et al.  MUSer2: An Efficient MUS Extractor , 2012, J. Satisf. Boolean Model. Comput..

[16]  Peter J. Stuckey,et al.  Finding all minimal unsatisfiable subsets , 2003, PPDP '03.

[17]  María Teresa Gómez López,et al.  NMUS: Structural Analysis for Improving the Derivation of All MUSes in Overconstrained Numeric CSPs , 2007, CAEPIA.

[18]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Jennifer Ryan,et al.  Identifying Minimally Infeasible Subsystems of Inequalities , 1990, INFORMS J. Comput..