Proportions of students who use various modes of transportation to and from school in a representative population-based sample of children and adolescents, 1999.

OBJECTIVE The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of modes of transportation to school and to identify socioeconomic correlates. METHODS Proportions of students using different modes of transportation were estimated among a population-based sample of 3613 youth aged 9, 13, and 16 years who participated in the 1999 Quebec Child and Adolescent Health and Social Survey. RESULTS Weighted analyses showed significant differences in the use of different modes of transportation to and from school across socioeconomic groups. For example, 40.3%, 15.2%, and 13.0% of 9, 13, and 16 year olds walked to school. In addition, 1.2%, 11.3%, and 13.8% of 9, 13, and 16 year olds used public transportation whereas 33.1%, 51.2%, and 55.6% of 9, 13, and 16 year olds took the school bus to school; 14.3%, 7.3%, and 5.0% of 9, 13, and 16 year olds were transported by car; finally, 10.7%, 14.1%, and 11.7% of 9, 13, and 16 year olds indicated they used multiple modes of transportation. Girls, higher income of children, children of immigrants, and rural-dwelling children were less likely to walk to school. CONCLUSION Findings indicate that there are differing modes of transportation to and from school across socioeconomic groups.

[1]  Jo Salmon,et al.  Trends in children's physical activity and weight status in high and low socio‐economic status areas of Melbourne, Victoria, 1985–2001 , 2005, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[2]  Russell R Pate,et al.  Physical activity and active commuting to elementary school. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  J. Carlin,et al.  Walking to school and traffic exposure in Australian children , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[4]  James F Sallis,et al.  Active Transportation to School Over 2 Years in Relation to Weight Status and Physical Activity , 2006, Obesity.

[5]  C. Macera,et al.  Trends in Walking for Transportation in the United States, 1995 and 2001 , 2005, Preventing chronic disease.

[6]  A. Bauman,et al.  Active commuting to school among NSW primary school children: implications for public health. , 2006, Health & place.

[7]  L. Gauvin,et al.  Opportunities for Student Physical Activity in Elementary Schools: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Frequency and Correlates , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[8]  O. Bar-or,et al.  Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity , 1992 .

[9]  E. Levy,et al.  The Québec Child and Adolescent Health and Social Survey: design and methods of a cardiovascular risk factor survey for youth. , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[10]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students. Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Active commuting to and from school and BMI in elementary school children-preliminary data. , 2005, Child: care, health and development.

[12]  D. Neumark-Sztainer,et al.  Promoting healthy eating and physical activity in adolescents. , 1999, Adolescent medicine.

[13]  S. Carlson,et al.  Barriers to children walking to or from school--United States, 2004. , 2005, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.