Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale

Auctions, or competitive tenders, can overcome information asymmetries to efficiently allocate limited funding for ecosystem services. Most auctions focus on ecosystem services on individual properties to maximise the total amount provided. However, for many services it is not just the total quantity but their location in the landscape relative to other sites that matters. For example, biodiversity conservation may be much more effective if conserved sites are connected. Adapting auctions to address ecosystem services at the landscape scale requires an auction mechanism which can promote coordination while maintaining competition. Multi-round auctions, in which bidding is spread over a number of rounds with information provided between rounds on the location of other bids in the landscape, offer an approach to cost effectively deliver landscape-scale ecosystem services. Experimental economic testing shows these auctions deliver the most cost effective environmental outcomes when the number of rounds is unknown in advance, which minimises rent-seeking behaviour. It also shows that a form of bid-improvement rule facilitates coordination and reduces rent seeking. Where the biophysical science is well developed, such auctions should be relatively straightforward to implement and participate in, and have the potential to provide significantly better outcomes than standard 'one-shot' tenders.

[1]  M. Roberts,et al.  How Cost-Effective Are Land Retirement Auctions? Estimating the Difference between Payments and Willingness to Accept in the Conservation Reserve Program , 2005 .

[2]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Repetition and signalling: Experimental evidence from games with efficient equilibria , 2001 .

[3]  J. Shogren,et al.  Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second‐Price Auctions , 1999 .

[4]  H. Possingham,et al.  The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving forest mammals: A case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia , 2006 .

[5]  G. Daily,et al.  Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: Inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services , 2007 .

[6]  G. Parkhurst,et al.  Does complexity reduce coordination? , 2005 .

[7]  U. Latacz-Lohmann,et al.  Auctioning Conservation Contracts: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application , 1997 .

[8]  K. Abbink,et al.  Auctions for Government Securities: A Laboratory Comparison of Uniform, Discriminatory and Spanish Designs , 2002 .

[9]  R L Pressey,et al.  Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary future , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D P Faith,et al.  Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[12]  Natalia Fabra,et al.  Tacit Collusion in Repeated Auctions: Uniform Versus Discriminatory , 2003 .

[13]  Regina Lindborg,et al.  HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY AFFECTS PRESENT PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY , 2004 .

[14]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation , 2002 .

[15]  Yong Jiang,et al.  Designing a spatially-explicit nature reserve network based on ecological functions: An integer programming approach , 2007 .

[16]  D. Ojima,et al.  A Review of Climate‐Change Adaptation Strategies for Wildlife Management and Biodiversity Conservation , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Richard Woodward,et al.  Sequential License Buyback Auctions: An Experimental Analysis , 2010, Marine Resource Economics.

[18]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Using Laboratory Experiments for Policy Making: An Example from the Georgia Irrigation Reduction Auction , 2003 .

[19]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Collusion in Auctions for Emission Permits: An Experimental Analysis , 2008 .

[20]  I. Oliver,et al.  The NSW Environmental Services Scheme: Results for the biodiversity benefits index, lessons learned, and the way forward , 2005 .

[21]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat , 2007 .

[23]  David Cheal,et al.  Assessing the quality of native vegetation: The 'habitat hectares' approach , 2003 .

[24]  Mark Hostetler,et al.  Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems , 1999 .

[25]  Uwe Latacz-Lohmann,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Conservation Auctions: An Experimental Study , 2007, Land Economics.

[26]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Optimisation and the Selection of Conservation Contracts , 2007 .

[27]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss , 2001 .

[28]  J. Alm,et al.  Using Laboratory Experiments in Public Economics , 2007, National Tax Journal.

[29]  P. Klemperer What Really Matters in Auction Design , 2001 .

[30]  S. Ferrier,et al.  Linking site and regional scales of biodiversity assessment for delivery of conservation incentive payments , 2010 .

[31]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity conservation planning tools , 2006 .

[32]  Katherine H. Reichelderfer,et al.  Government Decision Making and Program Performance: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program , 1988 .

[33]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Rapid evaluation of metapopulation persistence in highly variegated landscapes. , 2009 .

[34]  David M. Stoms,et al.  Viable Reserve Networks Arise From Individual Landholder Responses To Conservation Incentives , 2006 .

[35]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  A Laboratory Comparison of Uniform and Discriminative Price Auctions for Reducing Non-point Source Pollution , 2005, Land Economics.

[36]  D P Faith,et al.  Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  Sven Wunder,et al.  Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits , 2008 .

[38]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework , 2010 .

[39]  J. Rolfe,et al.  A conservation auction for landscape linkage in the southern Desert Uplands, Queensland , 2009 .

[40]  Loris Strappazzon,et al.  Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial , 2003 .

[41]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution , 2003 .

[42]  John Rolfe,et al.  Testing and Implementing the Use of Multiple Bidding Rounds in Conservation Auctions: A Case Study Application , 2009 .