Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials?

This paper investigates modality elements in German dependent clauses. We demonstrate that although modal adverbial elements can appear freely in matrix clauses, they have a limited distribution in dependent clauses – showing up, for example, in non-factive complement clauses, but not in factive complement clauses. More generally, the modality potential comes to exist, in ways still to be explained, in what may be called ‘peripheral’ subordinate clauses rather than ‘central’ dependent clauses. To explain this distribution, we argue that for this distinction of dependent clauses phasehood should be extended beyond CP to embrace Force. From this point we continue to distinguish a proper left edge to the Force phase from a defective one with the result that the empirical status of dependent clauses is accounted for appropriately in Minimalist terms.

[1]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[2]  Gabriele Diewald,et al.  Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität , 1999 .

[3]  J. Bayer,et al.  Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types , 2011 .

[4]  Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir,et al.  Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions , 2003 .

[5]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Quantifying into Question Acts , 1999 .

[6]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  The puzzle of free indirect discourse , 2008 .

[7]  Pavel Caha,et al.  The nanosyntax of case , 2009 .

[8]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present , 2004 .

[9]  Jonny Butler,et al.  A minimalist treatment of modality , 2003 .

[10]  G. Longobardi How Comparative is Semantics? A Unified ParametricTheory of Bare Nouns and Proper Names , 2001 .

[11]  Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson Liberalizing modals and floating clause boundaries , 2008 .

[12]  María Luisa Rivero On indirect questions, commands and Spanish quotative 'Que' , 1994 .

[13]  Karen Lahousse,et al.  Information structure and epistemic modality in adverbial clauses in French , 2010 .

[14]  Antonio Fábregas Axial) Parts and Wholes , 2007 .

[15]  Marco Coniglio Modal particles, speaker-hearer links, and illocutionary force , 2012 .

[16]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Lexical Items in Complex Predications: Selection as Underassociation , 2008 .

[17]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[18]  M. Starke Towards elegant parameters: Language variation reduces to the size of lexically‐stored trees , 2014 .

[19]  Virginia Hill,et al.  Modal grammaticalization and the pragmatic field: A case study , 2011 .

[20]  Y. Hasegawa Soliloquy for linguistic investigation , 2011 .

[21]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Conditionals, factives and the left periphery , 2006 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  W. Abraham,et al.  Modality and theory of mind elements across languages , 2012 .

[24]  W. Abraham Wieso stehen nicht alle Modalpartikel in allen Satzformen , 1996 .