The String Stability of a Trajectory-Based Interval Management Algorithm in the Midterm Airspace

NASA’s first Air Traffic Management (ATM) Technology Demonstration (ATD-1) was created to facilitate the transition of mature ATM technologies from the laboratory to operational use. The technologies selected for demonstration are the Traffic Management Advisor with Terminal Metering (TMA-TM), which provides precise time-based scheduling in the terminal airspace; Controller Managed Spacing (CMS), which provides terminal controllers with decision support tools enabling precise schedule conformance; and Interval Management (IM), which consists of flight deck automation that enables aircraft to achieve or maintain a precise spacing interval behind a target aircraft. As the percentage of IM equipped aircraft increases, controllers may provide IM clearances to sequences, or strings, of IM-equipped aircraft. It is important for these strings to maintain stable performance. This paper describes an analytic analysis of the string stability of the latest version of NASA’s IM algorithm and a fast-time simulation designed to characterize the string performance of the IM algorithm. The analytic analysis showed that the spacing algorithm has stable poles, indicating that a spacing error perturbation will be reduced as a function of string position. The fast-time simulation investigated IM operations at two airports using constraints associated with the midterm airspace, including limited information of the target aircraft’s intended speed profile and limited information of the wind forecast on the target aircraft’s route. The results of the fast-time simulation demonstrated that the performance of the spacing algorithm is acceptable for strings of moderate length; however, there is some degradation in IM performance as a function of string position.

[1]  Terence S. Abbott A Brief History of Airborne Self-Spacing Concepts , 2009 .

[2]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Statistical engineering approach to improve the realism of computer-simulated experiments with aircraft trajectory clustering , 2017 .

[3]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing System , 2011 .

[4]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Fast-Time Evaluations of Airborne Merging and Spacing in Terminal Arrival Operations , 2005 .

[5]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Airborne-Managed Spacing in Multiple Arrival Streams , 2004 .

[6]  B. T. Baxley,et al.  NASA's ATM technology demonstration-1: Integrated Concept of arrival operations , 2012, 2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[7]  John E. Robinson,et al.  A Concept for Robust, High Density Terminal Air Traffic Operations , 2010 .

[8]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Experiment Description and Results for Arrival Operations Using Interval Management with Spacing to Parallel Dependent Runways (IMSPiDR) , 2013 .

[9]  Lesley A. Weitz,et al.  String Stability Analysis of Selected Speed Control Laws for Interval Management , 2012 .

[10]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Interval Management with Spacing to Parallel Dependent Runways (IMSPIDR) Experiment and Results , 2012 .

[11]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  An Evaluation of a Flight Deck Interval Management Algorithm Including Delayed Target Trajectories , 2014 .

[12]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Simulation Results for Airborne Precision Spacing along Continuous Descent Arrivals , 2008 .

[13]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Modeling Delay and Delivery Accuracy for Mixed Absolute and Relative Spacing Operations , 2014 .

[14]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Evaluation of an Airborne Spacing Concept, On-Board Spacing Tool, and Pilot Interface , 2011 .

[15]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration-1 Concept of Operations (ATD-1 ConOps) , 2012 .

[16]  Kurt A. Swieringa,et al.  An Evaluation of Retrofit Flight Deck Displays for Interval Management , 2014 .

[17]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Evaluation of an Airborne Spacing Concept to Support Continuous Descent Arrival Operations , 2009 .

[18]  Terence S. Abbott An Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Seventh Revision , 2015 .

[19]  Terence S. Abbott An Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing to Include Parallel Runway Operations , 2011 .

[20]  John E. Robinson,et al.  Benefits of Continuous Descent Operations in High-Density Terminal Airspace Under Scheduling Constraints , 2010 .

[21]  Clay E. Hubbs,et al.  Acceptability of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedures , 2013 .

[22]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Evaluation of Airborne Precision Spacing in a Human-in-the-Loop Experiment , 2005 .

[23]  B. Barmore Airborne Precision Spacing: A Trajectory-Based Aprroach to Improve Terminal Area Operations , 2006, 2006 ieee/aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[24]  Kurt A. Swieringa,et al.  Evaluation of Flight Deck-Based Interval Management Crew Procedure Feasibility , 2013 .