The roles of categorization, affective image and constraints on destination choice: An application of the NMNL model

Abstract The purpose of this study is to explain travelers’ decision-making process by investigating the roles of categorization, affective image and constraints in forming the choice set model. First, similar destinations are categorized by the MDS approach to make late consideration sets. Then a two-stage nested multinomial logit model is utilized to show that the intention to visit a specific destination is determined sequentially from the late consideration set. Affective images of the destinations and the individual's constraints are influential variables in this process. The dependent variable is the intention to visit each of eight national parks in Korea. The results support the effectiveness of the categorization concept and sequential process in the destination choice process. The relative influences of the constraints over the intention to visit each destination were estimated by direct elasticity.

[1]  G. Marakas Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century , 1998 .

[2]  Alan R. Graefe,et al.  Nature tourism constraints - a cross-activity comparison. , 2004 .

[3]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Affective Images of Tourism Destinations , 1997 .

[4]  John L. Crompton,et al.  Influence of cognitive distance in vacation choice. , 2001 .

[5]  David B. Klenosky The “Pull” of Tourism Destinations: A Means-End Investigation , 2002 .

[6]  K. Henderson,et al.  Women with physical disabilities and the negotiation of leisure constraints , 1995 .

[7]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[8]  J. Crompton STRUCTURE OF VACATION DESTINATION CHOICE SETS , 1992 .

[9]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[10]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[11]  Seyhmus Baloglu,et al.  A model of destination image formation , 1999 .

[12]  E. L. Jackson,et al.  Negotiation of Leisure Constraints by Junior-High and High-School Students: An Exploratory Study , 1995 .

[13]  Yoav Ganzach Goals as Determinants of Nonlinear Noncompensatory Judgment Strategies: Leniency vs Strictness , 1993 .

[14]  Geoffrey Godbey,et al.  Negotiation of leisure constraints , 1993 .

[15]  A. Woodside,et al.  Building and testing theories of decision making by travellers , 2005 .

[16]  J. Crompton,et al.  Integrating Constraints and Benefits to Identify Responsive Target Markets for Museum Attractions , 1996 .

[17]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[18]  Peter A. Rogerson,et al.  A nested urban recreation site choice model , 1988 .

[19]  Paul Kwame Ankomah An exploratory study of the role of cognitive distance in the evolution of vacation choice sets , 1992 .

[20]  Leo van Wissen,et al.  Modelling urban housing market dynamics : evolutionary patterns of households and housing in Amsterdam , 1988 .

[21]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[22]  S. L. Richardson,et al.  Motion picture impacts on destination images , 2003 .

[23]  James G. March,et al.  Organizational decision making: Understanding how decisions happen in organizations , 1996 .

[24]  David T. Taylor,et al.  Destination Marketing By States , 1991 .

[25]  Y. Mansfeld From motivation to actual travel , 1992 .

[26]  Glenda Taylor,et al.  The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. , 1988 .

[27]  S. Shaw,et al.  Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. , 1991 .

[28]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Communication and Channel Systems in Tourism Marketing , 1994 .

[29]  Charles R. Schwenk Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making , 1984 .

[30]  J. Vaske,et al.  Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. In: Proceedings - symposium on recreation choice behavior, Missoula, Montana, March 22-23, 1984. , 1985 .

[31]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[32]  D. Walmsley,et al.  Evaluative Images and Tourism: The Use of Personal Constructs to Describe the Structure of Destination Images , 1998 .

[33]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[34]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  Aliza Fleischer,et al.  Tourism constraints among Israeli seniors. , 2002 .

[36]  G. Godbey,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF LEISURE CONSTRAINTS , 1991 .

[37]  Seyhmus Baloglu,et al.  A Path Analytic Model of Visitation Intention Involving Information Sources, Socio-Psychological Motivations, and Destination Image , 2000 .

[38]  Murphy A. Sewall,et al.  A Choice Sets Model of Retail Selection , 1987 .

[39]  Josefa D. Martín,et al.  Factors influencing destination image , 2004 .

[40]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[41]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  The effects of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice , 1988 .

[42]  A. Pizam,et al.  Consumer Behavior in Travel and Tourism , 1999 .

[43]  Brenda Soars,et al.  What every retailer should know about the way into the shopper’s head , 2003 .

[44]  D. McFadden Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[45]  Jaishankar Ganesh,et al.  Quantitative tools in tourism research: An application of perceptual maps , 2000 .

[46]  Charles R. Schwenk The Essence of Strategic Decision Making , 1988 .

[47]  John L. Crompton,et al.  CHOICE SET PROPOSITIONS IN DESTINATION DECISIONS , 1993 .

[48]  Vicki L. Sauter,et al.  Decision Support Systems: An Applied Managerial Approach , 1996 .

[49]  Wendy Z. Hultsman,et al.  The Influence of Others as a Barrier to Recreation Participation Among Early Adolescents , 1993 .

[50]  J. Crompton,et al.  The Roles of Perceived Inhibitors and Facilitators in Pleasure Travel Destination Decisions , 1992 .

[51]  S. Hudson,et al.  Tourism demand constraints: a skiing participation. , 2000 .

[52]  A. Karlqvist,et al.  Spatial interaction theory and planning models , 1978 .

[53]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Traveler Evoked, Inept, and Inert Sets of Vacation Destinations , 1977 .

[54]  Charlotte M. Echtner,et al.  The Measurement of Destination Image: An Empirical Assessment , 1993 .

[55]  R. Young,et al.  Using the Theory of Reasoned Action to Improve the Understanding of Recreation Behavior , 1985 .

[56]  Jennifer Hubbard,et al.  Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corporate Employee Recreation Setting , 2001 .

[57]  J. Crompton Motivations for pleasure vacation , 1979 .

[58]  Deborah L. Kerstetter,et al.  Testing a Constraints Model within the Context of Nature-Based Tourism , 2002 .

[59]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[60]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[61]  J. Crompton,et al.  Developing a Revised Competitive Position for Sun/Lost City, South Africa , 1999 .

[62]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  In Search of Brand Image: a Foundation Analysis , 1990 .

[63]  Christos Siderelis,et al.  A Boating Choice Model for the Valuation of Lake Access , 1995 .

[64]  G. Godbey,et al.  Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure , 1987 .

[65]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling: Concepts and Applications , 1989 .

[66]  A. Woodside,et al.  A General Model Of Traveler Destination Choice , 1989 .