Industrial R&D as a National Policy: Horizontal Technology Policies and Industry-State Co-Evolution in the Growth of the Israeli Software Industry

The Israeli software industry has been an indisputable success since the 1990s. This paper utilizes the development of the Israeli industry to empirically explore the argument of the horizontal technology policies (HTP) framework on the impact of neutral science and technology policies on industrial development. The paper micro-analyzes the Israeli software industry and compares its unique historical development pattern with other emerging countries. It describes (1) the rise of this industry as one outcome of the development of the entire IT industry in Israel; (2) the reasons behind the industry's ability to conduct and focus on intensive RD and (3) the industry's success in becoming an integral part of the American financial and IT industrial sector. It argues that only by understanding the intricate co-evolution of state-industry relations and the specific HTP regime employed in Israel can we understand the current behavior, conditions, business models, and capability of the industry. Therefore, the argument is that Israel's industrial science and technology developmental agencies did not aim at creating a software industry, but rather at the development of novel products R&D-based industry. However, the software industry has been significantly influenced throughout its development by the specific system of innovation which these policies fostered. Thus, the paper argues that public policy is one of the main reasons why the industry has focused almost entirely on product R&D activities. In addition, the paper suggests that the state's science and technology industrial policy has propelled the industry into its intimate relationship with the American financial sector.

[1]  D. Felsenstein.  The Making of a High Technology Node: Foreign-owned Companies in Israeli High Technology , 1997 .

[2]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[3]  Josh Whitford.  Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. By Dan Breznitz. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2007. Pp. xvii+262. $45.00. , 2008 .

[4]  Dan Breznitz.  Innovation and the State , 2007 .

[5]  A. Arora,et al.  In the Footsteps of Silicon Valley , 2004 .

[6]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[7]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Company Growth, Acquisitions and Access to Complementary Assets in Israel's Data Security Sector , 2002 .

[8]  E. Carmel,et al.  Israel's Silicon Wadi: The forces behind cluster formation , 2004 .

[9]  Manuel Trajtenberg.  Innovation in Israel 1968-97: a Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data , 1999 .

[10]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Evolutionary Venture Capital Policies: Insights from a Product Life Cycle Analysis of Israel’s Venture Capital Industry , 2003 .

[11]  Dan Breznitz.  Innovation-Based Industrial Policy in Emerging Economies? The Case of Israel's it Industry , 2006 .

[12]  Ashish Arora,et al.  From Underdogs to Tigers , 2005 .

[13]  Manuel Trajtenberg.  R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment , 2000 .

[14]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Software Industry and India's Economic Development , 2001 .

[15]  Gil Avnimelech,et al.  Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence & development of Israel's new high tech cluster , 2004 .

[16]  Morris Teubal,et al.  A catalytic and evolutionary approach to horizontal technology policies (HTPs) , 1997 .

[17]  Marco S. Giarratana,et al.  The role of the multinational companies , 2005 .

[18]  A. Arora,et al.  The Indian Software Services Industry , 1999 .

[19]  Morris Teubal,et al.  analysis of r & d failure , 1993 .

[20]  Seã N Ó Riain.  The Flexible Developmental State: Globalization, Information Technology, and the “Celtic Tiger” , 2000 .

[21]  Ehud Zuscovitch,et al.  Technology Infrastructure Policy: An international perspective , 1996 .

[22]  S. O. Riain.  An Offshore Silicon Valley? The Emerging Irish Software Industry , 1997 .

[23]  M. Teubal.  What is the systems perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy(ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies , 2002 .

[24]  Ehud Zuscovitch,et al.  Technological Infrastructure Policy , 1996 .

[25]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[26]  Morris Teubal.  Neutrality in science policy: The promotion of sophisticated industrial technology in Israel , 1983 .

[27]  Seymour E. Goodman,et al.  Israel: of swords and software plowshares , 1994, CACM.

[28]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[29]  M. Teubal.  R&D and technology policy in NICs as learning processes , 1996 .

[30]  Dan Breznitz.  Collaborative Public Space in a National Innovation System: A Case Study of the Israeli Military's Impact on the Software Industry , 2005 .

[31]  D. Cetindamar.  The Growth of Venture Capital: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2003 .

[32]  Seán O'Riain,et al.  International Perspectives , 2013 .

[33]  Bent Petersen,et al.  Role of Transnational Corporations in the Evolution of a High-Tech Industry: The Case of India's Software Industry , 2002 .