Productivity Potentials of the Global Land Resource for Cropping and Grazing

The chapter gives an overview of global land potentials, crop yields and their limiting factors, and of methods to evaluate the productivity potential of land. Maintaining the capacity of the global land resource to produce plant biomass which can be used for humans is one of the most challenging issues of the 21st century. We need methodologies to observe and control the status of the potential productivity of agricultural and other lands. Methods of overall soil quality assessment which include the most significant factors and indicators relevant to soil productivity potentials can be useful tools for monitoring and managing the global soil resource sustainably. The aim was to find a common basis for soil productivity evaluation, as required by a global community of land users to allow achievement of high productivity in the context of a sustainable multifunctional use of landscapes. Results showed that soil types or reference groups in most existing soil classifications are largely defined on pedogenetic criteria and provide insufficient information to assess soil functionality. Traditional specific soil and land evaluation schemes already exist at national levels. They are based on different concepts of soil fertility or quality, local soil properties and the types of land use and management that prevail in the region or country. Their soil data inputs differ, ratings are not transferable and not applicable in transnational studies. At a transnational level, methods like agro-ecological zoning or ecosystem and crop models provide reliable assessments of land productivity potentials. Such methods are not intended for a field scale application to detect main soil constraints or to derive soil management recommendations in situ. A comparative analysis of several soil and land evaluation methods revealed the usefulness of indicator-based approaches applicable reliably, simply and consistently over different scales, from field level to large regions (aided by soil maps). Basic soil survey methods, including visual tactile soil structure assessment, are useful diagnostic tools for the recognition of productivity limiting soil attributes and estimation of indicator values. We advocate a straightforward indicator-based soil functional assessment system supplementing the current WRB (2006) classification or the coming Universal Soil Classification. It operates as a useful tool for monitoring, planning and management decisions based on soil quality (SQ) by detecting properties and limitation of soils for cropping and grazing and by providing estimates of attainable crop yields over different scales. The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (M-SQR), described in a chapter of Part II, has the potential to serve as a global reference assessment method of soil productivity potentials consistently over different scales. It combines visual methods of soil assessment (methods of soil survey, visual assessment of soil structure) with climate data in expert-based evaluation, classification and ranking schemes. M-SQR has been successfully tested in most agricultural regions worldwide. It provides concrete results about soil quality but also a frame for further research towards sustainable agricultural practices.

[1]  Sarfraz Ahmad,et al.  RANGELAND DEGRADATION AND MANAGEMENT APPROACHES IN BALOCHISTAN, PAKISTAN , 2012 .

[2]  W. Rothkegel Geschichtliche Entwicklung der Bodenbonitierungen und Wesen und Bedeutung der Deutschen Bodenschätzung , 1950 .

[3]  Humberto Blanco-Canqui,et al.  Crop Residue Removal Impacts on Soil Productivity and Environmental Quality , 2009 .

[4]  T. Batey,et al.  Field assessment of soil structural quality – a development of the Peerlkamp test , 2007 .

[5]  Robin P. White,et al.  Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems. , 2000 .

[6]  D. Byerlee,et al.  Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? , 2011 .

[7]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  Trade-off between wheat yield and drainage under current and climate change conditions in northeast Germany , 2006 .

[8]  L. Jackson,et al.  Special Issue Article: Advancing Environmental Conservation: Essays In Honor Of Navjot Sodhi Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification , 2012 .

[9]  G. Spoor,et al.  Vulnerability of subsoils in Europe to compaction: a preliminary analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Józef Horabik,et al.  Encyclopedia of agrophysics , 2011 .

[11]  Timo Hamers,et al.  Integrated soil and sediment research : a basis for proper protection : selected proceedings of the first European Conference on Integrated Research for Soil and Sediment Protection and Remediation (EUROSOL) , 2012 .

[12]  Uwe Schindler,et al.  Above ground biomass and water use efficiency of crops at shallow water tables in a temperate climate , 2005 .

[13]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Desertification alters regional ecosystem–climate interactions , 2005 .

[14]  D. Oyedele,et al.  Response of soil properties and maize yield to simulated erosion by artificial topsoil removal , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[15]  Guenther Fischer,et al.  Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century , 2002 .

[16]  J. Catt The agricultural importance of loess , 2001 .

[17]  Katharina Helming,et al.  A framework for assessing agricultural soil quality on a global scale , 2010 .

[18]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  New challenges for agricultural research: climate change, food security, rural development, agricultural knowledge systems. 2nd SCAR Foresight exercise , 2009 .

[19]  N. Borlaug Feeding a Hungry World , 2007, Science.

[20]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands , 2006 .

[21]  F. Salako,et al.  Soil strength and maize yield after topsoil removal and application of nutrient amendments on a gravelly Alfisol toposequence , 2007 .

[22]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Spatial and temporal effects of direct drilling on soil structure in the seedling environment , 2003 .

[23]  D. C. McKenzie,et al.  Soil compaction: identification directly in the field , 2006 .

[24]  G. Henebry,et al.  Climate and environmental change in arid Central Asia: impacts, vulnerability, and adaptations. , 2009 .

[25]  R. Lal,et al.  Soils and food sufficiency. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[26]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for Food Security in 2030 , 2008, Science.

[27]  W. Schillinger Practical lessons for successful long-term cropping systems experiments , 2010, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[28]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Effects of fertilization and cutting frequency on the water balance of a temperate grassland , 2012 .

[29]  H. Es,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for landscape and urban management , 2008 .

[30]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions — the SENSOR approach , 2008 .

[31]  R. Lal,et al.  Soils and sustainable agriculture. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[32]  Технология Springer Science+Business Media , 2013 .

[33]  S. G. Reynolds,et al.  Grasslands of the world. , 2005 .

[34]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of land use policies , 2008 .

[35]  Aiming Qi,et al.  Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050 , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  G. Spoor Alleviation of soil compaction: requirements, equipment and techniques , 2006 .

[37]  Robert J. A. Jones,et al.  The Effect of Soil Erosion on Europe’s Crop Yields , 2007, Ecosystems.

[38]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Crop responses to compacted soil: capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation , 2005 .

[39]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  The Soil Management Assessment Framework , 2004 .

[40]  Anònim Anònim Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[41]  W. Blum,et al.  Soil Protection Concept of The Council of Europe and Integrated Soil Research , 1993 .

[42]  James J. Dynes,et al.  Soil solutions for a Changing World , 2011 .

[43]  Daniel N. Mugendi,et al.  Scientific evaluation of smallholder land use knowledge in Central Kenya , 2008 .

[44]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[45]  M. Petrick,et al.  Rediscovering the Virgin Lands: Agricultural Investment and Rural Livelihoods in a Eurasian Frontier Area , 2013 .

[46]  K. Sayre,et al.  Research Prospectus: A Vision for Sustainable Land Management Research in Central Asia. , 2009 .

[47]  Yong Li,et al.  Visual assessment of soil structure: Evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany Part I: Comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals , 2009 .

[48]  Li Hongwen,et al.  Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. , 2010 .

[49]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial) , 1997 .

[50]  W. Mirschel,et al.  Assessing the Productivity Function of Soils , 2011 .

[51]  J. Lipiec,et al.  Review of modelling crop growth, movement of water and chemicals in relation to topsoil and subsoil compaction , 2003 .

[52]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Time for a universal soil classification system. , 2010 .