Application of stress test concepts for port infrastructures against natural hazards. The case of Thessaloniki port in Greece

Abstract An engineering risk-based methodology for stress testing critical infrastructures is introduced and applied to the port of Thessaloniki in Greece exposed to seismic, geotechnical and tsunami hazards. The methodology workflow consists of four phases: Pre-Assessment, Assessment, Decision and Report phase. In the pre-assessment phase, all the necessary information is collected and archived. For the pilot study, the inventory includes the main port components namely buildings, waterfronts, cranes and the electric power system. Generic or site-specific fragility models are used for all exposed elements and considered hazards. Risk metrics and objectives are defined related to the functionality of the system and the structural losses. In the first level of the assessment phase, the performance of each component is evaluated using a risk-based approach. Then, a system level probabilistic risk analysis is conducted separately for earthquake and tsunami hazards. A complementary scenario-based risk analysis is carried out aiming to investigate the impact of site-specific response and extreme seismic events to the performance of the port. In the Decision phase, the results are compared with predefined objectives to decide whether the infrastructure passes, partly passes or fails the test. Guidelines and strategies to improve the performance and resilience of the port are summarized.

[1]  Roberto Basili,et al.  A global probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment from earthquake sources , 2017, Special Publications.

[2]  R. Basili,et al.  Quantification of source uncertainties in Seismic Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (SPTHA) , 2016 .

[3]  Frank J. Groen,et al.  QRAS - the quantitative risk assessment system , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Jean H. Prevost,et al.  A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils , 1985 .

[5]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Disruption risks and mitigation strategies: an analysis of Asian ports , 2015 .

[6]  Chiara Smerzini,et al.  Evaluation of earthquake ground motion and site effects in the Thessaloniki urban area by 3D finite-fault numerical simulations , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[8]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  George Gazetas,et al.  Seismic Effective-Stress Analysis of Caisson Quay Walls: Application to Kobe , 2005 .

[10]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Risk assessment framework for exposure of cargo and ports to natural hazards and climate extremes , 2017 .

[11]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Estimation of Downtime-Related Revenue Losses in Seaports following Scenario Earthquakes , 2004 .

[12]  Simona Esposito,et al.  Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems , 2014 .

[13]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities , 2009 .

[14]  Gregory P. Tsinker,et al.  Port engineering : planning, construction, maintenance, and security , 2004 .

[15]  Stephanie E. Chang "Transportation Performance, Disaster Vulnerability, and Long-Term Effects of Earthquakes" , 2000 .

[16]  Randall J. LeVeque,et al.  Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis: Multiple Sources and Global Applications , 2017 .

[17]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Integrating geologic fault data into tsunami hazard studies , 2013 .

[18]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Determination of S-wave velocity structure using microtremors and spac method applied in Thessaloniki (Greece) , 2004 .

[19]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings , 2006 .

[20]  James B. Rice,et al.  Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities: Methodology and Applications , 2014 .

[22]  Sonia Giovinazzi,et al.  Seismic performance of buried electrical cables: evidence-based repair rates and fragility functions , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[23]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A practice‐oriented estimation of the failure probability of building structures , 2012 .

[24]  M. Miraei,et al.  FRAGILITY CURVES FOR ASSESSING THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF GRAVITY QUAY WALLS , 2014 .

[25]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Irene Eusgeld,et al.  "System-of-systems" approach for interdependent critical infrastructures , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[28]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Space and Time Spectra of Stationary Stochastic Waves, with Special Reference to Microtremors , 1957 .

[29]  Jose Manuel González Vida,et al.  Tsunami-HySEA: A GPU based model for the Italian candidate Tsunami Service Provider , 2015 .

[30]  Rafael Molina,et al.  Overtopping hazards to port activities: Application of a new methodology to risk management (POrt Risk MAnagement Tool) , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk: Buildings, Lifelines, Transportation Networks and Critical Facilities , 2014 .

[32]  Cheng-Hsien Hsieh,et al.  Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency , 2014 .

[33]  Giovanni Sansavini,et al.  A quantitative method for assessing resilience of interdependent infrastructures , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Roberto Basili,et al.  From regional to site specific SPTHA through inundation simulations: a case study for three test sites in Central Mediterranean , 2016 .

[35]  Martin Hammitzsch,et al.  Development of tsunami early warning systems and future challenges , 2012 .

[36]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Probabilistic hazard for seismically induced tsunamis: accuracy and feasibility of inundation maps , 2015 .

[37]  Terje Aven,et al.  Practical implications of the new risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[38]  Jacopo Selva,et al.  Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment of interaction among risks , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[39]  Helen Crowley,et al.  Risk-targeted Hazard Maps for Europe , 2014 .

[40]  Abdollah Shafieezadeh,et al.  Scenario-based resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure systems: Case study for seismic resilience of seaports , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  M. J. Castro,et al.  Fast evaluation of tsunami scenarios: uncertainty assessment for a Mediterranean Sea database , 2016 .

[42]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  Accounting for Epistemic Uncertainty in PSHA: Logic Tree and Ensemble Modeling , 2014 .

[43]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[44]  Benjamin David Kosbab,et al.  Seismic performance evaluation of port container cranes allowed to uplift , 2010 .

[45]  Sotiris Argyroudis,et al.  A Boolean Networks Approach to Modeling and Resilience Analysis of Interdependent Critical Infrastructures , 2018, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[46]  Andrés Silva,et al.  A modeling framework for the resilience analysis of networked systems-of-systems based on functional dependencies , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[47]  Takahiro Sugano,et al.  Seismic Design Guidelines For Port Structures , 2001 .

[48]  S. Fotopoulou,et al.  Fragility curves for reinforced concrete buildings to seismically triggered slow-moving slides , 2013 .

[49]  M. Erdik REPORT ON 1999 KOCAELI AND DÜZCE (TURKEY) EARTHQUAKES , 2001 .

[50]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Systemic Seismic Risk Assessment of Road Networks Considering Interactions with the Built Environment , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[51]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Risk assessment in maritime transportation , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[52]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Thessaloniki’s Detailed Microzoning: Subsurface Structure as Basis for Site Response Analysis , 2001 .

[53]  M. Dolšek,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE RISK-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN PROCEDURE TO A REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME BUILDING , 2014 .