Are MOOCs Promising Learning Environments

This article reflect upon MOOCs as technology enhanced learning environments. The increase in numbers of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has been dramatic in recent years. MOOCs may be considered to be a new form of virtual technology enhanced learning environments. Two types of MOOCs may be distinguished: cMOOCs as proposed by Siemens, based on his ideas of connectivism, and xMOOCs developed in institutions such as Stanford and MIT. Although they have received a great deal of attention, they have also met with criticism. The time has therefore come to critically reflect upon this phenomenon. While there is still relatively little empirical research on the effects of MOOCs on learning, this study tries to shed light on the issue from a theoretical point of view. It will first explore positive and negative expectations regarding MOOCs. MOOCs might constitute a good option if they can be delivered on a large scale, and this will only be possible for a few big institutions. There is no empirical research which would uphold the claims concerning their positive effects. It will then review classical and more recent learning theories with respect to their capability to explain the process of learning in order to compare traditional online courses, xMOOC and cMOOC with respect to their potential to support learning and its self-regulation.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[3]  B F SKINNER,et al.  Teaching machines; from the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self instruction. , 1958, Science.

[4]  Andrew S. Gibbons and Jon Nelson and Robert Richards,et al.  The nature and origin of instructional objects , 2000 .

[5]  Jos Beishuizen,et al.  A conceptual framework for research on self-regulated learning , 2011 .

[6]  Sara Malo Cerrato,et al.  Cambios en las Relaciones y Satisfacciones Intergeneracionales Asociados al Uso de las TICs , 2010 .

[7]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[8]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: a European perspective , 2011 .

[9]  Tony Hall.  Digital Renaissance: The Creative Potential of Narrative Technology in Education , 2012 .

[10]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Self-Regulation: Directions and Challenges for Future Research , 2000 .

[11]  Angelo Chiarle.  The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2017 .

[12]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Communication patterns in massively open online courses , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Scott Beckstrand.  Towards More Independent Learning: A Southern Nevada Perspective , 2001 .

[14]  Stephen Parker,et al.  Inside higher education , 2009 .

[15]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life , 2003, Ageing and Society.

[16]  Karl Steffens,et al.  Self‐Regulated Learning in Technology‐Enhanced Learning Environments: lessons of a European peer review , 2006 .

[17]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The firekeepers: aging considered as a resource , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  S. Jarrott.  Where Have We Been and Where are We Going? Content Analysis of Evaluation Research of Intergenerational Programs , 2011 .

[19]  H. W. Hodgins.  The Future of Learning Objects , 2002 .

[20]  C. Don.  Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain , 2004 .

[21]  Andrew Large,et al.  “Bonded design”: A novel approach to intergenerational information technology design , 2006 .

[22]  David Preece,et al.  Changing Higher Education , 2001 .

[23]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[24]  J. Piaget,et al.  La psychologie de l'intelligence , 1949 .

[25]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[26]  B F SKINNER,et al.  Teaching Machines , 1962 .

[27]  Joseph C. Pitt,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology , 1999 .

[28]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[29]  Jack R. Lohmann,et al.  The Future of Learning Objects , 2002 .

[30]  J. Greene.  Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? , 2008 .

[31]  D. Moxley,et al.  Promising Practices Useful in the Design of an Intergenerational Program: Ten Assertions Guiding Program Development , 2012 .

[32]  R. N. Caine,et al.  Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain , 1991 .

[33]  David Bawden,et al.  Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[34]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[35]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Connectivism as a Digital Age Learning Theory , 2013 .

[36]  I. McManus.  Knowing the knowledge. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[37]  Thierry Karsenti.  The MOOC What the research says , 2013 .

[38]  Andrew J. Saltarelli,et al.  Who Takes MOOCs , 2016 .

[39]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[40]  Daniel J. Hruschka,et al.  Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[41]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[42]  Armando Fox,et al.  From MOOCs to SPOCs , 2013, CACM.

[43]  Linda Lohr,et al.  Psychology of learning for instruction , 2005 .

[44]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[45]  Steve Howard,et al.  “I Wish We Could Get Together”: Exploring Intergenerational Play Across a Distance via a ‘Magic Box’ , 2008 .

[46]  H. Kay.  Teaching Machines , 1961, Nature.