A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord

Knowledge of the average size and variability of the human spinal cord can be of importance when treating pathological conditions in the spinal cord. Data on healthy human spinal cord morphometrics have been published for more than a century using different techniques of measurements, but unfortunately, comparison of results from different studies is difficult because of the different anatomical landmarks used as reference points along the craniocaudal axis for the measurements. The aim of this review was to compute population estimates of the transverse and anteroposterior diameter of the human spinal cord by comparing and combining previously published data on a normalized craniocaudal axis. We included 11 studies presenting measurements of spinal cord cross-sectional diameters, with a combined sample size ranging from 15 to 488 subjects, depending on spinal cord level. Based on five published studies presenting data on the lengths of the segments of the spinal cord and vertebral column, we calculated the relative positions of all spinal cord neuronal segments and vertebral bony segments and mapped measurements of spinal cord size to a normalized craniocaudal axis. This mapping resulted in better alignment between studies and allowed the calculation of weighted averages and standard deviations (SDs) along the spinal cord. These weighted averages were smoothed using a generalized additive model to yield continuous population estimates for transverse and anteroposterior diameter and associated SDs. The spinal cord had the largest transverse diameter at spinal cord neuronal segment C5 (13.3 ± 2.2), decreased to segment T8 (8.3 ± 2.1), and increased slightly again to 9.4 ± 1.5 at L3. The anteroposterior diameter showed less variation in size along the spinal cord at C5 (7.4 ± 1.6), T8 (6.3 ± 2.0), and L3 (7.5 ± 1.6). All estimates are presented in millimeters ± 2 SDs. We conclude that segmental transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the healthy human spinal cord from different published sources can be combined on a normalized craniocaudal axis and yield meaningful population estimates. These estimates could be useful in routine management of patients with neurodegenerative diseases as well as for clinical research and experimental applications aimed at surgical spinal cord repair.

[1]  H. H. Donaldson,et al.  A description of charts showing the areas of the cross sections of the human spinal cord at the level of each spinal nerve , 1903 .

[2]  H C ELLIOTT,et al.  Cross‐sectional diameters and areas of the human spinal cord , 1945, The Anatomical record.

[3]  L A LURIE,et al.  Physical factors. , 1948, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

[4]  C. C. Francis,et al.  Dimensions of the cervical vertebrae , 1955, The Anatomical record.

[5]  Akademisk Avhandling,et al.  THE SAGITTAL DIAMETER OF THE SPINAL CORD AND SUBARACHNOID SPACE IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS. A ROENTGENOGRAPHIC POST-MORTEM STUDY. , 1964, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[6]  J. Barnes,et al.  Accurate CT measurement of the spinal cord using metrizamide: physical factors. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  A. Lamont,et al.  Cervical cord size in metrizamide myelography. , 1981, Clinical radiology.

[8]  Y. Tanaka,et al.  [Morphological changes of the cervical spinal canal and cord due to aging]. , 1984, Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi.

[9]  M Nissan,et al.  The cervical and lumbar vertebrae--an anthropometric model. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[10]  G R Fernie,et al.  An anatomical comparison of the human and bovine thoracolumbar spine , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[12]  B Latimer,et al.  Vertebral Body and Posterior Element Morphology: The Normal Spine in Middle Life , 1988, Spine.

[13]  C M Citrin,et al.  Measurements of the normal cervical spinal cord on MR imaging. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[15]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions , 1991, Spine.

[16]  T. Kameyama,et al.  Morphometry of the Normal Cadaveric Cervical Spinal Cord , 1992, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[17]  [MR imaging of the spinal cord--with special emphasis on the factors influencing spinal cord measurement]. , 1992, No to shinkei = Brain and nerve.

[18]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Human Lumbar Vertebrae: Quantitative Three-Dimensional Anatomy , 1992, Spine.

[19]  Length and caudal level of termination of the spinal cord in Thai adults. , 1994, Acta anatomica.

[20]  G. Sobue,et al.  Morphologic Features of the Normal Human Cadaveric Spinal Cord , 1996, Spine.

[21]  K. Fountas,et al.  Cervical Spinal Cord‐Smaller Than Considered? , 1998, Spine.

[22]  M. Horstink,et al.  Morphology of the cervical spinal cord on computed myelography , 1979, Neuroradiology.

[23]  H. Ko,et al.  Gross quantitative measurements of spinal cord segments in human , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[24]  G. Boulay,et al.  Morphology and measurements of the cervical spinal cord in computer-assisted myelography , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[25]  M Shoham,et al.  Morphological study of the spinal canal content for subarachnoid endoscopy. , 2006, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[26]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2010 .

[27]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[28]  A. Thompson,et al.  Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  S. Lalwani,et al.  Spinal cord injury. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[30]  D. Mikulis,et al.  Characterizing the Location of Spinal and Vertebral Levels in the Human Cervical Spinal Cord , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[31]  David H. Miller,et al.  Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis—diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value , 2015, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[32]  C. Wilke Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for 'ggplot2' , 2015 .

[33]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Cell-Based Clinical Translation Concise Review : Bridging the Gap : Novel Neuroregenerative andNeuroprotective Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury , 2016 .