Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces.

Many plant surfaces are water-repellent because of a complex 3-dimensional microstructure of the epidermal cells (papillae) and a superimposed layer of hydrophobic wax crystals. Due to its surface tension, water does not spread on such surfaces but forms spherical droplets that lie only on the tips of the microstructures. Studying six species with heavily microstructured surfaces by a new type of confocal light microscopy, the number, height, and average distance of papillae per unit area were measured. These measurements were combined with those of an atomic force microscope which was used to measure the exposed area of the fine-structure on individual papillae. According to calculations based upon these measurements, roughening results in a reduction of the contact area of more than 95% compared with the projected area of a water droplet. By applying water/methanol solutions of decreasing surface tension to a selection of 33 water-repellent species showing different types of surface structures, the critical value at which wetting occurs was determined. The results impressively demonstrated the importance of roughening on different length scales for water-repellency, since extremely papillose surfaces, having an additional wax layer, are able to resist up to 70% methanol. Surfaces that lack papillae or similar structures on the same length scale are much more easily wetted.

[1]  L. Boize,et al.  The influence of leaf surface roughness on the spreading of oil spray drops , 1976 .

[2]  A. Adamson.  Physical chemistry of surfaces , 1960 .

[3]  P. Gennes.  Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[4]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Liquid substitution: A versatile procedure for SEM specimen preparation of biological materials without drying or coating , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  Walter J. Murphy,et al.  ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY SERIES: Numbers 15 and 17 Demonstrate Rapidly Crowing Interest in Documentation; International Conference To Be Held in 1958 , 1956 .

[6]  D. M. Hall,et al.  Wettability of leaves of a selection of New Zealand plants , 1974 .

[7]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[8]  M. Berenbaum.  Insects and the plant surface , 1988 .

[9]  Ingeborg Rentschler.  Die Wasserbenetzbarkeit von Blattoberflächen und ihre submikroskopische Wachsstruktur , 1971, Planta.

[10]  Henk J. Busscher,et al.  The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids , 1984 .

[11]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects , 1981 .

[12]  S. Storp,et al.  Mechanisms controlling leaf retention of agricultural spray solutions , 1991 .

[13]  J. Zabkiewicz,et al.  Effects of surfactants on droplet spreading and drying rates in relation to foliar uptake , 1988 .

[14]  H. Scher,et al.  Pesticide formulations. Innovations and developments. , 1988 .

[15]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Methanol as a rapid fixative for the investigation of plant surfaces by SEM , 1996 .

[16]  Terence Desmond Blake,et al.  Contact-Angle Hysteresis , 1973 .

[17]  Stephan Herminghaus,et al.  Roughness-induced non-wetting , 2000 .

[18]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces , 1997 .

[19]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[20]  Ce Jeffree,et al.  The cuticle, epicuticular waxes and trichomes of plants, with reference to their structure, functions and evolution , 1986 .

[21]  R. N. Wenzel.  RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[22]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super-Water-Repellent Fractal Surfaces , 1995 .

[23]  D. Claugher.  Scanning electron microscopy in taxonomy and functional morphology , 1990 .

[24]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super Water-Repellent Surfaces Resulting from Fractal Structure , 1996 .

[25]  W. F. Meggitt,et al.  Alteration of epicuticular wax structure by surfactants , 1983 .

[26]  J. Bico,et al.  ERRATUM: Pearl drops , 1999 .

[27]  P. J. Holloway.  Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves , 1970 .

[28]  E. Baker,et al.  Studies of plant cuticle and spray droplet interactions: A fresh approach† , 1983 .

[29]  J. L. Moilliet.  Waterproofing and water-repellency , 1963 .

[30]  Yamamoto,et al.  Super Water- and Oil-Repellent Surfaces Resulting from Fractal Structure. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[31]  E. A. Baker,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of plant cuticles , 1971 .

[32]  Hans J. Tiziani,et al.  Highly accurate non-contact characterization of engineering surfaces using confocal microscopy , 1998 .

[33]  H. Linskens.  Quantitative Bestimmung der Benetzbarkeit von Blattoberflächen , 1950, Planta.

[34]  P. J. Holloway.  The effects of superficial wax on leaf wettability , 1969 .

[35]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis: II. Contact Angle Measurements on Rough Surfaces , 1964 .

[36]  G. Berlyn,et al.  Measuring the contact angle of water droplets on foliar surfaces , 1988 .

[37]  Hermann Ziegenspeck.  Zur physikalischen Chemie unbenetzbarer besonders bewachster Blätter , 1942 .

[38]  G. E. Fogg,et al.  Quantitative studies on the wetting of leaves by water , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.