Materials as stem cell regulators.

The stem cell/material interface is a complex, dynamic microenvironment in which the cell and the material cooperatively dictate one another's fate: the cell by remodelling its surroundings, and the material through its inherent properties (such as adhesivity, stiffness, nanostructure or degradability). Stem cells in contact with materials are able to sense their properties, integrate cues via signal propagation and ultimately translate parallel signalling information into cell fate decisions. However, discovering the mechanisms by which stem cells respond to inherent material characteristics is challenging because of the highly complex, multicomponent signalling milieu present in the stem cell environment. In this Review, we discuss recent evidence that shows that inherent material properties may be engineered to dictate stem cell fate decisions, and overview a subset of the operative signal transduction mechanisms that have begun to emerge. Further developments in stem cell engineering and mechanotransduction are poised to have substantial implications for stem cell biology and regenerative medicine.

[1]  H. Zreiqat,et al.  The synergistic effect of hierarchical micro/nano-topography and bioactive ions for enhanced osseointegration. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[2]  O. Lee,et al.  Matrix stiffness regulation of integrin‐mediated mechanotransduction during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  Junmin Lee,et al.  Directing stem cell fate on hydrogel substrates by controlling cell geometry, matrix mechanics and adhesion ligand composition. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[4]  A. Tanswell,et al.  Inhibition of mechanical strain‐induced fetal rat lung cell proliferation by gadolinium, a stretch‐activated channel blocker , 1994, Journal of cellular physiology.

[5]  Jason A Burdick,et al.  Moving from static to dynamic complexity in hydrogel design , 2012, Nature Communications.

[6]  J. Farmer,et al.  Incorporation of As , 2002 .

[7]  William Arbuthnot Sir Lane,et al.  Endostatin: An Endogenous Inhibitor of Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth , 1997, Cell.

[8]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[9]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.

[10]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  Peter W Zandstra,et al.  Incorporation of biomaterials in multicellular aggregates modulates pluripotent stem cell differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. , 2013, Biotechnology journal.

[13]  Andrew W. Holle,et al.  More than a feeling: discovering, understanding, and influencing mechanosensing pathways. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[14]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity Sensing at the Leading Edge through αvβ3 Integrins and RPTPα , 2006 .

[15]  Arnold I Caplan,et al.  The MSC: an injury drugstore. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[16]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[17]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  Nicholas A. Kouris,et al.  Harnessing endogenous growth factor activity modulates stem cell behavior. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[19]  T. Sasaki,et al.  Endostatin-induced tyrosine kinase signaling through the Shb adaptor protein regulates endothelial cell apoptosis. , 2000, Blood.

[20]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[22]  Robert Langer,et al.  Polymer surface functionalities that control human embryoid body cell adhesion revealed by high throughput surface characterization of combinatorial material microarrays. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[23]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[24]  Choon Kiat Lim,et al.  Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. , 2013, ACS nano.

[25]  F. Duprat,et al.  The mechano-gated K2P channel TREK-1 , 2009, European Biophysics Journal.

[26]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Lahann,et al.  Fabrication of synthetic polymer coatings and their use in feeder-free culture of human embryonic stem cells , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[28]  K. Anseth,et al.  Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2008, Nature materials.

[29]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Surface-engineered substrates for improved human pluripotent stem cell culture under fully defined conditions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  W. Birch,et al.  Temporal application of topography to increase the rate of neural differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[31]  Sirio Dupont Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011 .

[32]  J. Hoyer,et al.  Ca2+ influx through stretch-activated cation channels activates maxi K+ channels in porcine endocardial endothelium. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Yong Yang,et al.  Nanotopography as modulator of human mesenchymal stem cell function. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[34]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Assaying stem cell mechanobiology on microfabricated elastomeric substrates with geometrically modulated rigidity , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[35]  J. Schrooten,et al.  A calcium-induced signaling cascade leading to osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[36]  F Sachs,et al.  Thermodynamics of mechanosensitivity , 2004, Physical biology.

[37]  W. Murphy,et al.  The effect of mineral coating morphology on mesenchymal stem cell attachment and expansion. , 2012, Journal of materials chemistry.

[38]  Mikaël M. Martino,et al.  The 12th-14th type III repeats of fibronectin function as a highly promiscuous growth factor-binding domain. , 2010, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[39]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[40]  S. Varghese,et al.  Mineralized synthetic matrices as an instructive microenvironment for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2012, Macromolecular bioscience.

[41]  M. Stevens,et al.  Changes in embryonic stem cell colony morphology and early differentiation markers driven by colloidal crystal topographical cues. , 2012, European cells & materials.

[42]  W. Murphy,et al.  Specific VEGF sequestering and release using peptide-functionalized hydrogel microspheres. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[43]  Pawel Herzyk,et al.  Nanotopographical Effects on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Morphology and Phenotype , 2014, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[44]  Stuart B Goodman,et al.  The sequential expression profiles of growth factors from osteoprogenitors [correction of osteroprogenitors] to osteoblasts in vitro. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[45]  V. Markin,et al.  Mechanosensitive ion channels as reporters of bilayer expansion. A theoretical model. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[46]  J. Temenoff,et al.  Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell shape in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels is decoupled from upregulation of fibroblast markers under cyclic tension. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[47]  J. Piek,et al.  Hyaluronic acid: targeting immune modulatory components of the extracellular matrix in atherosclerosis. , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.

[48]  G. Charras,et al.  Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Hae-Won Kim,et al.  Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering. , 2009, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[50]  S. Weiss,et al.  MT1-MMP-dependent control of skeletal stem cell commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ signaling axis. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[51]  W. Murphy,et al.  Surfaces That Sequester Serum‐Borne Heparin Amplify Growth Factor Activity , 2011, Advanced materials.

[52]  R. Savani,et al.  Hyaluronan-mediated angiogenesis in vascular disease: uncovering RHAMM and CD44 receptor signaling pathways. , 2007, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[53]  K. Anseth,et al.  Extracellular matrix protein adsorption to phosphate-functionalized gels from serum promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[54]  Ning Wang,et al.  Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions , 2010, PloS one.

[55]  Mark W. Tibbitt,et al.  Dynamic Microenvironments: The Fourth Dimension , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[56]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[57]  S. Bruder,et al.  Growth, differentiation capacity, and function of mesenchymal stem cells expanded in serum-free medium developed via combinatorial screening. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[58]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[59]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. , 2013, Nature materials.

[60]  J. Burdick,et al.  Stem Cell Response to Spatially and Temporally Displayed and Reversible Surface Topography , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[61]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Impact of degradable macromer content in a poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel on neural cell metabolic activity, redox state, proliferation, and differentiation. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[62]  Takahiro Suzuki,et al.  Calcium influx through a possible coupling of cation channels impacts skeletal muscle satellite cell activation in response to mechanical stretch. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[63]  Albert J Keung,et al.  A genetic strategy for the dynamic and graded control of cell mechanics, motility, and matrix remodeling. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[64]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[65]  B. Boyan,et al.  Tailoring adipose stem cell trophic factor production with differentiation medium components to regenerate chondral defects. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[66]  A. G. Fadeev,et al.  Synthetic peptide-acrylate surfaces for long-term self-renewal and cardiomyocyte differentiation of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[67]  A. Yee,et al.  Expression of Oct4 in human embryonic stem cells is dependent on nanotopographical configuration. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[68]  Raghu Kalluri,et al.  Human tumstatin and human endostatin exhibit distinct antiangiogenic activities mediated by αvβ3 and α5β1 integrins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  R. Nerem,et al.  Engineering the Emergence of Stem Cell Therapeutics , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[70]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[71]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Impact of lactic acid on cell proliferation and free radical‐induced cell death in monolayer cultures of neural precursor cells , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[72]  B. Ebert,et al.  Implantable microenvironments to attract hematopoietic stem/cancer cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Yubing Xie,et al.  High-throughput screening of substrate chemistry for embryonic stem cell attachment, expansion, and maintaining pluripotency. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.

[74]  A. Elia,et al.  p130Cas alters the differentiation potential of mammary luminal progenitors by deregulating c‐Kit activity , 2013, Stem cells.

[75]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.

[76]  M. Sokabe,et al.  Sensing substrate rigidity by mechanosensitive ion channels with stress fibers and focal adhesions. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[77]  Erin Rericha,et al.  Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[78]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.

[80]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  In situ mechanotransduction via vinculin regulates stem cell differentiation , 2013, Stem cells.

[81]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Hydrogels with time-dependent material properties enhance cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[82]  Ying Mei,et al.  Combinatorial Development of Biomaterials for Clonal Growth of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2010, Nature materials.

[83]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[84]  X. Zhao,et al.  Long-term self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells on peptide-decorated poly(OEGMA-co-HEMA) brushes under fully defined conditions. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[85]  Melissa A. Kinney,et al.  Emerging strategies for spatiotemporal control of stem cell fate and morphogenesis. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[86]  A. Engler,et al.  Cell instructive microporous scaffolds through interface engineering. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[87]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[88]  T. Ma,et al.  Autocrine fibroblast growth factor 2‐mediated interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and the extracellular matrix under varying oxygen tension , 2013, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[89]  Alicia J El Haj,et al.  Controlled differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells using magnetic nanoparticle technology. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[90]  David Hughes,et al.  The fourth Dimension , 2009, 0905.3048.

[91]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[92]  W. Murphy,et al.  Modular peptide growth factors for substrate-mediated stem cell differentiation. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[93]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  H. Schöler,et al.  Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by a small molecule , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[95]  J. Collier,et al.  Engineering a biospecific communication pathway between cells and electrodes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[97]  Nathaniel S. Hwang,et al.  Calcium phosphate-bearing matrices induce osteogenic differentiation of stem cells through adenosine signaling , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[98]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. , 2009, Nano letters.

[99]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblast communication is controlled by intercellular mechanical coupling , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[100]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan-binding hydrogels enable mechanical control of human pluripotent stem cell self-renewal. , 2012, ACS nano.

[101]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[103]  S. Thrun,et al.  Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.

[104]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[105]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Exploring the Neighborhood Adhesion-Coupled Cell Mechanosensors , 2002, Cell.

[106]  Murat Guvendiren,et al.  Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics , 2012, Nature Communications.

[107]  Charles Kooperberg,et al.  The emergence of lineage-specific chromosomal topologies from coordinate gene regulation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Photodegradable Hydrogels for Dynamic Tuning of Physical and Chemical Properties , 2009, Science.

[109]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[110]  Li Yang,et al.  Biophysical regulation of histone acetylation in mesenchymal stem cells. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[111]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Involvement of stretch-activated ion channels in strain-regulated glycosaminoglycan synthesis in mesenchymal stem cell-seeded 3D scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[112]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[113]  王立平,et al.  Strontium enhances osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and in vivo bone formation by activating Wnt/catenin signaling , 2011 .

[114]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[115]  C. D. Reyes,et al.  Bio-adhesive Surfaces to Promote Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[116]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Nuclear Lamin-A Scales with Tissue Stiffness and Enhances Matrix-Directed Differentiation , 2013, Science.

[117]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.

[118]  S. Hollister,et al.  Inorganic coatings for optimized non-viral transfection of stem cells , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[119]  C. Murphy,et al.  The influence of substrate topography on the migration of corneal epithelial wound borders. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[120]  M. Lutolf,et al.  Artificial niche microarrays for probing single stem cell fate in high throughput , 2011, Nature Methods.

[121]  K. Kang,et al.  Soluble factors from ASCs effectively direct control of chondrogenic fate , 2010, Cell proliferation.

[122]  David A. Brafman,et al.  Engineering cell-material interfaces for long-term expansion of human pluripotent stem cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[123]  William L Murphy,et al.  Screening for 3D environments that support human mesenchymal stem cell viability using hydrogel arrays. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.