The effects of perceptual history on memory of visual objects

We investigated how the recognition and perception of memory-stored visual objects are influenced by cumulative experience with similar stimuli. The memory of a face was established by training observers to identify a set of faces as either "friends" or "non-friends". Subsequently, for multiple daily sessions, observers continued to perform this identification task, in which presented faces included a sequence of morphed faces, gradually transforming from a friend face (source) to another initially distinguishable non-friend face (target), interleaved with other faces. Initially observers identified only the first part of the morph sequence as "friends". In experimental conditions for which the initial "friends" portion was at least 54% of the sequence, this portion increased along repeated daily practice, until eventually most of the sequence was identified as "friends". After this practice, perceived similarity between source and target faces was much higher than the average similarity between the other face images. These effects did not occur when the morph images were shown in random order using a similar protocol. In addition, corresponding recognition confusions between source and target faces were found. Our findings suggest that memories of objects can be changed as a result of exposure to similar stimuli and show the dependency of these changes on the order in which stimuli are presented and on their level of similarity.

[1]  D. Amit,et al.  Retrospective and prospective persistent activity induced by Hebbian learning in a recurrent cortical network , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[3]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .

[4]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Y. Miyashita.  Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[6]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Storing infinite numbers of patterns in a spin-glass model of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  Configural masking of faces: Evidence for high-level interactions in face perception , 2005, Vision Research.

[8]  Y. Dudai.  The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Altering object representations through category learning , 2001, Cognition.

[11]  M. Webster,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2002 .

[12]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Effects of temporal association on recognition memory , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Knott.  The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[14]  K. Kurtz.  Category Learning and Comparison in the Evolution of Similarity Structure , 1998 .

[15]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  S. Ullman.  High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .

[17]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[20]  H. Wilson,et al.  The nature of synthetic face adaptation , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[23]  H. Johnson,et al.  Bacterial and retroviral superantigens share a common binding region on class II MHC antigens , 1993, Nature.

[24]  Karim Nader,et al.  Memory traces unbound , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  Kenneth R. Livingston,et al.  Categorical Perception Effects Induced by Category Learning , 1998 .

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994 .

[28]  H. Damasio,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence: Special Issue on Perceptual Organization in Computer Vision , 1998 .

[29]  I. Biederman,et al.  Inferior Temporal Neurons Show Greater Sensitivity to Nonaccidental than to Metric Shape Differences , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[31]  E. Rolls,et al.  INVARIANT FACE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION IN THE VISUAL SYSTEM , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[32]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Conversion of Temporal Correlations Between Stimuli to Spatial Correlations Between Attractors , 1999, Neural Computation.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Macaque Perirhinal Neurons during and after Visual Stimulus Association Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  D. Sagi,et al.  Dynamics of Memory Representations in Networks with Novelty-Facilitated Synaptic Plasticity , 2006, Neuron.

[36]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Spin-glass models of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[37]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.