Marked differences in the thermal characteristics of figure-of-eight shaped coils used for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE To compare the heating behaviour of three figure-of-eight shaped coils during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METHODS A custom-made coil (referred to as test coil) with a resistance-optimized conductor geometry was compared with two commercially available eight-shaped coils. Each coil was attached to the same energy source, which generated trains of 50 biphasic magnetic pulses every 20s. Coil temperature was continuously measured during nine rTMS protocols using various combinations of stimulus frequencies (5, 10 or 20Hz) and intensities (40, 50 or 60% of maximum stimulator output). A heating curve relating coil temperature and the number of applied stimuli was generated for each coil and rTMS condition. In eleven healthy volunteers, we evaluated the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. For each coil, we determined the motor threshold (MT) in the right first dorsal interosseus muscle. RESULTS The slope of the heating curves of the test coil was markedly flattened relative to the heating curves of the two standard coils. This allowed the application of at least twice as many stimuli until the temperature of the coil reached 40 degrees C. Based on these data, we showed that a one-mass model could be used to accurately describe the heating behaviour of each coil. MTs determined with the test coil were comparable to or lower than the MTs that were determined with the standard coils. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of the test coil to stimulate the M1 was comparable to the efficacy of the two standard coils, yet thermal characteristics were markedly improved. SIGNIFICANCE Overheating of figure-of-eight shaped coils can be markedly delayed without reducing the efficacy of rTMS.

[1]  M Hallett,et al.  Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Sarah H Lisanby,et al.  Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[5]  M Hallett,et al.  A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  D M Durand,et al.  Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  P. Mazzone,et al.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  B N Cuffin,et al.  Developing a more focal magnetic stimulator. Part I: Some basic principles. , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  V. Amassian,et al.  Stimulation of the Human Nervous System Using the Magnetic Coil , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  S H Lisanby,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applications in Neuropsychiatry , 1999 .

[13]  M. Erb,et al.  The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[15]  P. Rossini,et al.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[16]  B Conrad,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has a beneficial effect on bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[17]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp , 1999, Neurology.

[20]  D. Cohen,et al.  Developing a more focal magnetic stimulator. Part II: Fabricating coils and measuring induced current distributions. , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[21]  A T Barker,et al.  The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.