New rules of sociological method : rethinking technology studies

Social constructivism is strong in the deconstruction of technological or economic determinism and in the reconstruction of practice, talk and translation between actors. However, it fails to account for institutionalized selective structures and to consider path dependencies and other conditions of global stabilization. On the basis of the author's theoretical reading and empirical research in the field of technology studies twelve rules are extracted to summarize the state-of-the-art. These rules will enable to overcome the deficiencies of action-oriented approaches on the one side and of structuralist approaches on the other side. Inspired by A. Giddens's new rules of sociological method, a constructivist explanation of technology generation on the local level is combined with a social evolutionary approach of structural selection on the global level

[1]  W. Bijker The social construction of bakelite: toward a theory of invention , 1987 .

[2]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[3]  Hans-Joachim Schulz,et al.  Computer und Macht in Organisationen , 1990 .

[4]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations , 1988 .

[5]  Günther Ortmann,et al.  Computer und Macht in Organisationen : Mikropolitische Analysen , 1990 .

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Technology, Sociotechnical Systems, Technological Development : An Evolutionary Perspective , 1992 .

[7]  H. Joas,et al.  The Creativity of Action , 1996 .

[8]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[9]  J. Elster Explaining Technical Change , 1983 .

[10]  Y. Gingras Un air de radicalisme : sur quelques tendances récentes en sociologie de la science et de la technologie , 1995 .

[11]  D. Campbell Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .

[12]  W. Krohn,et al.  Die Gesellschaft als Labor , 1990 .

[13]  H. Nowotny Actor-Networks vs. Science as a Self-Organizing System: A Comparative View of Two Constructivist Approaches , 1990 .

[14]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[15]  N. Luhmann Evolution und Geschichte , 1975 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[17]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Book Reviews : SOCIETIES : EVOLUTIONARY AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES. By Talcott Parsons. London: Prentice Hall, 1967. Pp. 120. Price 12s. 6d , 1968 .

[18]  Larry A. Hickman,et al.  John Dewey's Pragmatic Technology , 1990 .

[19]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[20]  Gerald Wagner Vertrauen in Technik , 1994 .

[21]  P. Rosen,et al.  The Social Construction of Mountain Bikes: Technology and Postmodernity in the Cycle Industry , 1993 .

[22]  B. Wynne Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding , 1988 .

[23]  Leonhard Hennen,et al.  Technisierung des Alltags , 1992 .

[24]  Philip J. Vergragt The Social Shaping of Industrial Innovations , 1988 .

[25]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[26]  W. Sewell A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  G. Ropohl Technisches Problemlösen und soziales Umfeld , 1990 .

[28]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  The Technical Shaping of Technology: Real-World Constraints and Technical Logic in Edison's Electrical Lighting System , 1995 .

[29]  Jeffrey C. Alexander,et al.  From Reduction to Linkage: The long View of the Micro-Macro Debate , 1987 .

[30]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[31]  M. Callon Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not , 1980 .

[32]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[33]  Stewart Russell The Social Construction of Artefacts: a Response to Pinch and Bijker , 1986 .

[34]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[35]  R. Werle,et al.  Koordination und Evolution: Technische Standards im Prozeß der Entwicklung technischer Systeme , 1992 .

[36]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[37]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[38]  J. Law TECHNOLOGY AND HETEROGENEOUS ENGINEERING: THE CASE OF PORTUGUESE EXPANSION , 2018, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES.

[39]  M. Hård Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology , 1993 .

[40]  N. Rosenberg Technological Interdependence in the American Economy , 2023 .

[41]  Arthur L. Norberg,et al.  Syntony and Spark: The Origins of Radio , 1976 .

[42]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[43]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .