Communication apprehension, nonverbal immediacy, and negative expectations for learning

Data was collected to determine the effects of communication apprehension and nonverbal immediacy upon students' expectations of themselves as learners and to examine relationships among students' trait‐like communication apprehension, self‐perceived immediacy and instructors' evaluations. As expected, as apprehension went up, immediacy went down. Students who were high in apprehension or low in immediacy expected to achieve less in the classroom. Instructors' grades varied in predicted directions. Highly apprehensive and lowly immediate students received lower grades on average, but differences between high, moderate, and low levels were not significant. It is suggested that in some cases high motivation to achieve may compensate for being high in oral anxiety or low in nonverbal immediacy behaviors. All too often, however, lowered expectations for learning develop and set off a spiral of negative reciprocity which leads to lower evaluations by instructors.

[1]  Raymond L. Falcione,et al.  STUDIES OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION AND SELF‐ESTEEM , 1977 .

[2]  T. Levine,et al.  Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA‐24 , 1990 .

[3]  Rena Y. Robinson.  Affiliative Communication Behaviors: A Comparative Analysis of the Interrelationships among Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy, Responsiveness, and Verbal Receptivity on the Prediction of Student Learning. , 1995 .

[4]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[5]  M. Scott,et al.  Communication Apprehension, Intelligence, and Achievement Among Secondary School Students , 1978 .

[6]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  Classroom consequences of communication apprehension , 1977 .

[7]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Communication apprehension, student attitudes, and levels of satisfaction , 1977 .

[8]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  A model of immediacy in the classroom , 1994 .

[9]  Elizabeth E. Graham,et al.  A longitudinal study of college students’ communication competence , 1990 .

[10]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication , 1971 .

[11]  J. F. Andersen,et al.  The impact of lecturer nonverbal expressiveness on improving mediated instruction , 1981 .

[12]  J. Gorham,et al.  Effects of immediacy on recall of information , 1988 .

[13]  P. Kearney,et al.  Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes , 1985 .

[14]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success , 1989 .

[15]  John A. Daly,et al.  The Effects of Communication Apprehension on Interpersonal Attraction , 1975 .

[16]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  A multi‐cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1996 .

[17]  Lawrence B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Communication apprehension and self‐perceived communication competence of academically gifted students , 1995 .

[18]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and teachers , 1981 .

[19]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning , 1981 .

[20]  Philip M. Ericson,et al.  Two longitudinal studies of communication apprehension and its effects on college students' success , 1992 .

[21]  M. Smythe,et al.  COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION AND ACHIEVEMENT IN A PERFORMANCE‐ORIENTED BASIC COMMUNICATION COURSE , 1980 .

[22]  Gary M. Shulman,et al.  “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation , 1995 .

[23]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INTERACTION BEHAVIOR ON SOURCE CREDIBILITY, HOMOPHILY, AND INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION , 1974 .

[24]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  The Relationship of Teachers' Use of Humor in the Classroom to Immediacy and Student Learning. , 1990 .

[25]  Mike Allen,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Communication Apprehension and Cognitive Performance. , 1992 .

[26]  Susan M. Clark,et al.  Students' Participation in the Mixed-Age College Classroom. , 1996 .

[27]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Communication apprehension and self‐perceived communication competence of at‐risk students , 1992 .

[28]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  The impact of teacher immediacy on students' motivation: Is it the same for all students? , 1993 .

[29]  Robert A. Stewart,et al.  Communication apprehension and motivation as predictors of public speaking duration , 1986 .

[30]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  The content validity of the PRCA‐24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts , 1985 .

[31]  John A. Daly,et al.  PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1976 .

[32]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  TEACHERS' EXPECTATIONS OF THE COMMUNICATION APPREHENSIVE CHILD IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL , 1976 .

[33]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Communication apprehension, social preference, and social behavior in a college environment , 1978 .

[34]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  Oral Communication Apprehension , 1986 .

[35]  M. Booth-Butterfield,et al.  Stifle or stimulate? The effects of communication task structure on apprehensive and non‐apprehensive students , 1986 .

[36]  P. Fassinger,et al.  Professors' and Students' Perceptions of Why Students Participate in Class. , 1996 .

[37]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  Communication apprehension as a determinant of avoidance, withdrawal and performance anxiety , 1987 .

[38]  V. Richmond.  Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation , 1990 .

[39]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Communication: Apprehension, Avoidance, and Effectiveness , 1985 .

[40]  J. Gorham.  The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[41]  L. Kelly,et al.  A test of the effectiveness of the reticence program at the Pennsylvania state university , 1992 .

[42]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[43]  A comparison of teacher immediacy in African‐American and Euro‐American college classrooms , 1995 .

[44]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Silence Isn't Necessarily Golden: Communication Apprehension, Desired Social Choice, and Academic Success among Middle-School Students. , 1978 .

[45]  College student question‐asking: The relationship of classroom communication apprehension and motivation , 1993 .

[46]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The Relationship Between Communication Apprehension and Academic Achievement Among College Students. , 1976 .

[47]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  The Effects of Communication Apprehension and Test Anxiety on Three Indicants of Achievement in an Alternative System of Instruction: A Follow-Up Study , 1977 .

[48]  R. Wiseman,et al.  The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom , 1990 .

[49]  Jean A. Dobos.  Collaborative learning: Effects of student expectations and communication apprehension on student motivation , 1996 .