Spatial prediction of forest stand variables

This study aims at the development of a model to predict forest stand variables in management units (stands) from sample plot inventory data. For this purpose we apply a non-parametric most similar neighbour (MSN) approach. The study area is the municipal forest of Waldkirch, 13 km north-east of Freiburg, Germany, which comprises 328 forest stands and 834 sample plots. Low-resolution laser scanning data, classification variables as well rough estimations from the forest management planning serve as auxiliary variables. In order to avoid common problems of k-NN-approaches caused by asymmetry at the boundaries of the regression spaces and distorted distributions, forest stands are tessellated into subunits with an area approximately equivalent to an inventory sample plot. For each subunit only the one nearest neighbour is consulted. Predictions for target variables in stands are obtained by averaging the predictions for all subunits. After formulating a random parameter model with variance components, we calibrate the prior predictions by means of sample plot data within the forest stands via BLUPs (best linear unbiased predictors). Based on bootstrap simulations, prediction errors for most management units finally prove to be smaller than the design-based sampling error of the mean. The calibration approach shows superiority compared with pure non-parametric MSN predictions.

[1]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[2]  J. Nieschulze,et al.  Monitoring of Forests under Continuous Cover System Management , 2002 .

[3]  Jukka Malinen Locally Adaptable Non-parametric Methods for Estimating Stand Characteristics for Wood Procurement Planning , 2003 .

[4]  Daniel Mandallaz,et al.  Sampling Techniques for Forest Inventories , 2007 .

[5]  D. Mandallaz Geostatistical methods for double sampling schemes , 1993 .

[6]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of stem volume using airborne laser scanning, aerial photography, and stand-register data , 2006 .

[7]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  Partitioning error components for accuracy-assessment of near-neighbor methods of imputation , 2007 .

[8]  David A. Harville,et al.  Extension of the Gauss-Markov Theorem to Include the Estimation of Random Effects , 1976 .

[9]  K. Gadow,et al.  Continuous cover forestry : assessment, analysis, scenarios , 2002 .

[10]  J. R. Koehler,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[11]  E. Næsset,et al.  UTILIZING AIRBORNE LASER INTENSITY FOR TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION , 2007 .

[12]  P. Diggle,et al.  Model‐based geostatistics , 2007 .

[13]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[14]  C. Särndal,et al.  Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling , 1992 .

[15]  J. Nieschulze Regionalization of Variables of Sample Based Forest Inventories at the District Level , 2003 .

[16]  W. Härdle Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models , 2004 .

[17]  J. Lappi Forest inventory of small areas combining the calibration estimator and a spatial model , 2001 .

[18]  E. Vonesh,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements , 1996 .

[19]  Perttu Anttila,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of stand volume using spectral and spatial features of aerial photographs and old inventory data , 2002 .

[20]  J. Holmgren,et al.  TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL TREES IN SWEDEN BY COMBINING HIGH RESOLUTION LASER DATA WITH HIGH RESOLUTION NEAR-INFRARED DIGITAL IMAGES , 2004 .

[21]  Albert R. Stage,et al.  Most Similar Neighbor: An Improved Sampling Inference Procedure for Natural Resource Planning , 1995, Forest Science.

[22]  Johannes Breidenbach,et al.  A MIXED-EFFECTS MODEL TO ESTIMATE STAND VOLUME BY MEANS OF SMALL FOOTPRINT AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA FOR AN AMERICAN AND A GERMAN STUDY SITE , 2007 .