Bioinformatics for Vaccinology

CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgements Exordium: Vaccines: a Very, Very Short Introduction 1 Vaccines: Their Place in History Smallpox in History Variolation Variolation in History Variolation Comes to Britain Lady Mary Wortley Montagu Variolation and the Sublime Porte The Royal Experiment The Boston Connection Variolation Takes Hold The Suttonian Method Variolation in Europe The Coming of Vaccination Edward Jenner Cowpox Vaccination Vindicated Louis Pasteur Vaccination Becomes a Science Meister, Pasteur, and Rabies A Vaccine for Every Disease In the Time of Cholera Haffkine and Cholera Bubonic Plague The Changing Face of Disease Almroth Wright and Typhoid Tuberculosis, Koch, and Calmette Vaccine BCG Poliomyelitis Salk and Sabin Diptheria Whooping Cough Many Diseases, Many Vaccines Smallpox: Endgame Further Reading 2 Vaccines: Need and Opportunity Eradication and Reservoirs The Ongoing Burden of Disease Lifespans The Evolving Nature of Disease Economics, Climate, and Disease Three Threats Tuberculosis in the 21st Century HIV and AIDS Malaria: Then and Now Influenza Bioterrorism Vaccines as Medicines Vaccines and the Pharmaceutical Industry Making Vaccines The Coming of the Vaccine Industry 3 Vaccines: How They Work Challenging the Immune System The Threat from Bacteria: Robust, Diverse, and Endemic MiCrobes, Diversity, and Metagenomics The Intrinsic Complexity of the Bacterial Threat Microbes and Humankind The Nature of Vaccines Types of Vaccine Carbohydrate Vaccines Epitopic Vaccines Adjuvants and Vaccine Delivery Emerging Immunovaccinology The Immune System Innate Immunity Adaptive Immunity The Microbiome and Mucosal Immunity Cellular Components of Immunity Cellular Immunity The T Cell Repertoire Epitopes: The Immunological Quantum The Major Histocompatility Complex MHC Nomenclature Peptide Binding by the MHC The Structure of the MHC Antigen Presentation The Proteasome Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing Class II Processing Seek Simplicity and Then Distrust It Cross Presentation T Cell Receptor T Cell Activation Immunological Synapse Signal 1, Signal 2, Immunodominance Humoral Immunity Further Reading 4 Vaccines: Data and Databases Making Sense of Data Knowledge in a Box The Science of -Omes and -Omics The Proteome Systems Biology The Immunome Databases and Databanks The Relational Database The XML Database The Protein Universe Much Data, Many Databases What Proteins Do What Proteins Are The Amino Acid World The Chiral Nature of Amino Acids Naming the Amino Acids The Amino Acid Alphabet Defining Amino Acid Properties Size, Charge, and Hydrogen Bonding Hydrophobicity, Lipophilicity, and Partitioning Understanding Partitioning Charges, Ionization, and pKa Many Kinds of Property Mapping the World of Sequences Biological Sequence Databases Nucleic Acid Sequence Databases Protein Sequence Databases Annotating Databases Text Mining Ontologies Secondary Sequence Databases Other Databases Databases in Immunology Host Databases Pathogen Databases Functional Immunological Databases Composite, Integrated Databases Allergen Databases Further Reading Reference 5 Vaccines: Data Driven Prediction of Binders, Epitopes and Immunogenicity Towards Epitope-Based Vaccines T Cell Epitope Prediction Predicting MHC Binding Binding is Biology Quantifying Binding Entropy, Enthalpy, and Entropy-Enthalpy Compensation Experimental Measurement of Binding Modern Measurement Methods Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Long and Short of Peptide Binding The Class I Peptide Repertoire Practicalities of Binding Prediction Binding Becomes Recognition Immunoinformatics Lends a Hand Motif Based Prediction The Imperfect Motif Other Approaches to Binding Prediction Representing Sequences Computer Science Lends a Hand Artificial Neural Networks Hidden Markov Model Support Vector Machines Robust Multivariate Statistics Partial Least Squares Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships Other Techniques and Sequence Representations Amino Acid Properties Direct Epitope Prediction Predicting Antigen Presentation Predicting Class II MHC Binding Assessing Prediction Accuracy Roc Plots Quantitative Accuracy Prediction Assessment Protocols Comparing Predictions Prediction Versus Experiment Predicting B Cell Epitopes Peak Profiles and Smoothing Early Methods Imperfect B Cell Prediction References 6 Vaccines: Structural Approaches Structure and Function Structure and Function Types of Protein Structure Protein Folding Ramachandran Plots Local Structures Protein Families, Protein Folds Comparing Structures Experimental Structure Determination Structural Genomics Protein Structure Databases Other Databases Immunological Structural Databases Small Molecule Databases Protein Homology Modelling Using Homology Modelling Predicting MHC Supertypes Application to Alloreactivity 3D-QSAR Protein Docking Predicting B Cell Epitopes with Docking Virtual Screening Limitations to Virtual Screening Predicting Epitopes with Virtual Screening Virtual Screening and Adjuvant Discovery Adjuvants and Innate Immunity Small Molecule Adjuvants Molecular Dynamics and Immunology Molecular Dynamics Methodology Molecular Dynamics and Binding Immunological Applications Limitations of Molecular Dynamics Molecular Dynamics and High Performance Computing References 7 Vaccines: Computational Solutions Vaccines and the World Bioinformatics and the Challenge for Vaccinology Predicting Immunogenicity Computational Vaccinology The Threat Remains Beyond Empirical Vaccinology Designing New Vaccines The Perfect Vaccine Conventional Approaches Genome Sequences Size of a Genome Reverse Vaccinology Finding Antigens The Success of Reverse Vaccinology Tumour Vaccines Prediction and Personalised Medicine Imperfect Data Forecasting and the Future of Computational Vaccinology Index

[1]  Pingping Guan,et al.  EpiJen: a server for multistep T cell epitope prediction , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  Magdalini Moutaftsi,et al.  A consensus epitope prediction approach identifies the breadth of murine TCD8+-cell responses to vaccinia virus , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Johannes Söllner,et al.  Selection and combination of machine learning classifiers for prediction of linear B‐cell epitopes on proteins , 2006, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[4]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  Tomer Hertz,et al.  PepDist: A New Framework for Protein-Peptide Binding Prediction based on Learning Peptide Distance Functions , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  J. M. Carter,et al.  Epitope mapping of a protein using the Geysen (PEPSCAN) procedure. , 1994, Methods in molecular biology.

[7]  J A Koziol,et al.  Prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules. , 1995, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  K. R. Woods,et al.  Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Neural network method for predicting peptides that bind major histocompatibility complex molecules. , 2001, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  Neural Models for Predicting Viral Vaccine Targets , 2005, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[11]  M. Probst-Kepper,et al.  Conformational Restraints and Flexibility of 14-Meric Peptides in Complex with HLA-B*35011 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[13]  Ruurd van der Zee,et al.  Prediction of sequential antigenic regions in proteins , 1985, FEBS letters.

[14]  Sudipto Saha,et al.  Prediction of continuous B‐cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network , 2006, Proteins.

[15]  Kuo-Chen Chou,et al.  Predicting the affinity of epitope-peptides with class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201: an application of amino acid-based peptide prediction. , 2007, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[16]  W. Gillanders,et al.  Evidence for clonal deletion and clonal anergy after intrathymic antigen injection in a transplantation model. , 1997, Transplantation.

[17]  John Sidney,et al.  Improving MHC binding peptide prediction by incorporating binding data of auxiliary MHC molecules , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  David Heckerman,et al.  Leveraging Information Across HLA Alleles/Supertypes Improves Epitope Prediction , 2006, RECOMB.

[19]  H Mamitsuka,et al.  Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden markov models , 1998, Proteins.

[20]  T. Auton,et al.  Statistical comparison of established T-cell epitope predictors against a large database of human and murine antigens. , 1996, Molecular immunology.

[21]  G. Liang,et al.  A new sequence representation as applied in better specificity elucidation for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease. , 2007, Biopolymers.

[22]  E. Wimmer,et al.  Antigenic conservation and divergence between the viral-specific proteins of poliovirus type 1 and various picornaviruses. , 1985, Virology.

[23]  Morten Nielsen,et al.  A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using profile motifs. , 2002, Human immunology.

[25]  G. Gao,et al.  Virus-specific CTL responses induced by an H-2K(d)-restricted, motif-negative 15-mer peptide from the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus. , 2002, The Journal of general virology.

[26]  Bernd Mayer,et al.  Machine learning approaches for prediction of linear B‐cell epitopes on proteins , 2006, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[27]  K. Parker,et al.  Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[28]  Taku Suto,et al.  An automated prediction of MHC class I-binding peptides based on positional scanning with peptide libraries , 2000, Immunogenetics.

[29]  G W Butcher,et al.  Two different, highly exposed, bulged structures for an unusually long peptide bound to rat MHC class I RT1-Aa. , 2001, Immunity.

[30]  D. Flower,et al.  Modeling the peptide-T cell receptor interaction by the comparative molecular similarity indices analysis-soft independent modeling of class analogy technique. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Werner Braun,et al.  Robust quantitative modeling of peptide binding affinities for MHC molecules using physical-chemical descriptors. , 2007, Protein and peptide letters.

[32]  H. Grey,et al.  Prediction of major histocompatibility complex binding regions of protein antigens by sequence pattern analysis. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  W Fierz,et al.  Using a neural network to identify potential HLA‐DR1 binding sites within proteins , 1993, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[34]  Darren R. Flower,et al.  Predicting Class II MHC-Peptide binding: a kernel based approach using similarity scores , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[35]  P. S. Andersen,et al.  Shared fine specificity between T-cell receptors and an antibody recognizing a peptide/major histocompatibility class I complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Yingdong Zhao,et al.  Application of support vector machines for T-cell epitopes prediction , 2003, Bioinform..

[37]  P. Marrack,et al.  Alternate interactions define the binding of peptides to the MHC molecule IAb , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  V. Apostolopoulos,et al.  A 16-mer peptide (RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK) from antennapedia preferentially targets the Class I pathway. , 2001, Vaccine.

[39]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Natalie A Borg,et al.  High Resolution Structures of Highly Bulged Viral Epitopes Bound to Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  D. Flower,et al.  Benchmarking B cell epitope prediction: Underperformance of existing methods , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[42]  Wen Liu,et al.  Quantitative prediction of mouse class I MHC peptide binding affinity using support vector machine regression (SVR) models , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  Surajit Ray,et al.  Amino acid biophysical properties in the statistical prediction of peptide-MHC class I binding , 2007, Immunome research.

[44]  E. Celis,et al.  Use of two predictive algorithms of the world wide web for the identification of tumor-reactive T-cell epitopes. , 2000, Cancer research.

[45]  Darren R Flower,et al.  Coupling In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Peptide-MHC Binding: A Bioinformatic Approach Enabling Prediction of Superbinding Peptides and Anchorless Epitopes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  Ronna R Mallios,et al.  A consensus strategy for combining HLA-DR binding algorithms. , 2003, Human immunology.

[47]  Gajendra P.S. Raghava,et al.  Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. , 2004, Vaccine.

[48]  Lei Huang,et al.  A probabilistic meta-predictor for the MHC class II binding peptides , 2007, Immunogenetics.

[49]  T. Elliott,et al.  Poor correspondence between predicted and experimental binding of peptides to class I MHC molecules. , 2000, Tissue antigens.

[50]  Uthaman Gowthaman,et al.  In silico tools for predicting peptides binding to HLA-class II molecules: more confusion than conclusion. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[51]  S. Clementi,et al.  The importance of secondary anchor residue motifs of HLA class I proteins: a chemometric approach. , 1994, Molecular immunology.

[52]  Jean-Philippe Vert,et al.  Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders , 2008, Bioinform..

[53]  Pingping Guan,et al.  Analysis of peptide-protein binding using amino acid descriptors: prediction and experimental verification for human histocompatibility complex HLA-A0201. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.