The effect of knee model on estimates of muscle and joint forces in recumbent pedaling.

The usefulness of forward dynamic simulations to studies of human motion is well known. Although the musculoskeletal models used in these studies are generic, the modeling of specific components, such as the knee joint, may vary. Our two objectives were (1) to investigate the effects of three commonly used knee models on forward dynamic simulation results, and (2) to study the sensitivity of simulation results to variations in kinematics for the most commonly used knee model. To satisfy the first objective, three different tibiofemoral models were incorporated into an existing forward dynamic simulation of recumbent pedaling, and the resulting kinematics, pedal forces, muscle forces, and joint reaction forces were compared. Two of these models replicated the rolling and sliding motion of the tibia on the femur, while the third was a simple pin joint. To satisfy the second objective, variations in the most widely used of the three knee models were created by adjusting the experimental data used in the development of this model. These variations were incorporated into the pedaling simulation, and the resulting data were compared with the unaltered model. Differences between the two rolling-sliding models were smaller than differences between the pin-joint model and the rolling-sliding models. Joint reactions forces, particularly at the knee, were highly sensitive to changes in knee joint model kinematics, as high as 61% root mean squared difference, normalized by the corresponding peak force of the unaltered reference model. Muscle forces were also sensitive, as high as 30% root mean squared difference. Muscle excitations were less sensitive. The observed changes in muscle force and joint reaction forces were caused primarily by changes in the moment arms and musculotendon lengths of the quadriceps. Although some level of inaccuracy in the knee model may be acceptable for calculations of muscle excitation timing, a representative model of knee kinematics is necessary for accurate calculation of muscle and joint reaction forces.

[1]  F. Zajac Understanding muscle coordination of the human leg with dynamical simulations. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M L Hull,et al.  Evaluation of performance criteria for simulation of submaximal steady-state cycling using a forward dynamic model. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Computational Framework for Simulation and Analysis of Human and Animal Movement , 2000 .

[4]  Jeffrey A. Reinbolt,et al.  Are Patient-Specific Joint and Inertial Parameters Necessary for Accurate Inverse Dynamics Analyses of Gait? , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Peter Monk,et al.  A new approach to detecting leukemia: using computational electromagnetics , 1995 .

[6]  S. Delp,et al.  The action of the rectus femoris muscle following distal tendon transfer: does it generate knee flexion moment? , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[7]  T L Shercliff,et al.  The Geometry of the Knee in the Sagittal Plane , 1989, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  R. Nisell,et al.  Mechanics of the knee. A study of joint and muscle load with clinical applications. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[9]  F. Zajac,et al.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Physiological cross‐sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  R van Dijk,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric methods for the evaluation of the three dimensional kinematic behaviour and cruciate ligament length patterns of the human knee joint. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Terry K K Koo,et al.  In vivo determination of subject-specific musculotendon parameters: applications to the prime elbow flexors in normal and hemiparetic subjects. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Biarticulating two-dimensional computer model of the human patellofemoral joint. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  B. Prilutsky,et al.  Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M L Hull,et al.  Dynamic optimization analysis for equipment setup problems in endurance cycling. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Mensch Js,et al.  Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. , 1975 .

[18]  D. D’Lima,et al.  An implantable telemetry device to measure intra-articular tibial forces. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Masao Akagi,et al.  The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  M L Hull,et al.  A method of calculating physiologically relevant joint reaction forces during forward dynamic simulations of movement from an existing knee model. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M. Hull,et al.  Influence of Pedaling Rate on Muscle Mechanical Energy in Low Power Recumbent Pedaling Using Forward Dynamic Simulations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Validation of a lower limb model with in vivo femoral forces telemetered from two subjects. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  T. van Eijden,et al.  The orientation of the distal part of the quadriceps femoris muscle as a function of the knee flexion-extension angle. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Markus Kuster,et al.  Joint Load Considerations In Total Knee Replacement , 1997 .

[25]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  An EMG-based, muscle driven forward simulation of single support phase of gait. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Jichuan Zhang,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic performance of prosthetic knee joint using six-bar mechanism. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  P. Lugner,et al.  Dynamic simulation of FES-cycling: influence of individual parameters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  B Lundberg,et al.  Simulation of 'smart' pole vaulting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  F E Zajac,et al.  A state-space analysis of mechanical energy generation, absorption, and transfer during pedaling. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  F. Zajac,et al.  Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  S. Delp,et al.  Accuracy of muscle moment arms estimated from MRI-based musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[32]  M L Hull,et al.  Functional roles of the leg muscles when pedaling in the recumbent versus the upright position. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  C. Scovil,et al.  Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Scott L Delp,et al.  Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  Tibial anatomy and functional axes , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[36]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  A B Zavatsky,et al.  A Model of Human Knee Ligaments in the Sagittal Plane: Part 1: Response to Passive Flexion , 1992, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[38]  G Bergmann,et al.  Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  R R Neptune,et al.  Knee joint loading in forward versus backward pedaling: implications for rehabilitation strategies. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[40]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  S. Delp,et al.  Preserving plantar flexion strength after surgical treatment for contracture of the triceps surae: A computer simulation study , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[42]  E Y Chao,et al.  Validation of Three‐dimensional Reconstructions of Knee Anatomy: CT vs MR Imaging , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[43]  R R Neptune,et al.  General coordination principles elucidated by forward dynamics: minimum fatique does not explain muscle excitation in dynamic tasks. , 2000, Motor control.

[44]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  A new technique for measuring the rotational axis pathway of a moving knee , 1998 .

[45]  H. Hemami,et al.  Stability and a control strategy of a multilink musculoskeletal model with applications in FES , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.