Identifying sensitive sources and key control handles for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment.

This research investigates the effects of adjusting control handle values on greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment, and reveals critical control handles and sensitive emission sources for control through the combined use of local and global sensitivity analysis methods. The direction of change in emissions, effluent quality and operational cost resulting from variation of control handles individually is determined using one-factor-at-a-time sensitivity analysis, and corresponding trade-offs are identified. The contribution of each control handle to variance in model outputs, taking into account the effects of interactions, is then explored using a variance-based sensitivity analysis method, i.e., Sobol's method, and significant second order interactions are discovered. This knowledge will assist future control strategy development and aid an efficient design and optimisation process, as it provides a better understanding of the effects of control handles on key performance indicators and identifies those for which dynamic control has the greatest potential benefits. Sources with the greatest variance in emissions, and therefore the greatest need to monitor, are also identified. It is found that variance in total emissions is predominantly due to changes in direct N2O emissions and selection of suitable values for wastage flow rate and aeration intensity in the final activated sludge reactor is of key importance. To improve effluent quality, costs and/or emissions, it is necessary to consider the effects of adjusting multiple control handles simultaneously and determine the optimum trade-off.

[1]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Towards a benchmarking tool for minimizing wastewater utility greenhouse gas footprints. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[3]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities , 2012 .

[4]  P. Reed,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Comparing Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Advance Lumped Watershed Model Identification and Evaluation , 2022 .

[5]  I. Sobol Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 2004 .

[6]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Reducing the Complexity of Multiobjective Water Distribution System Optimization through Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2012 .

[7]  Juan A. Baeza,et al.  Multi-criteria selection of optimum WWTP control setpoints based on microbiology-related failures, effluent quality and operating costs , 2012 .

[8]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall‐runoff models using global sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[9]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. , 2009, Water research.

[11]  N Hvala,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. , 2007, Water research.

[12]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies. , 2011, Water research.

[14]  D. Butler,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. , 2014, Water research.

[15]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[16]  D. Butler,et al.  Identifying key sources of uncertainty in the modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment. , 2013, Water research.

[17]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Krist V Gernaey,et al.  Effect of nitrite, limited reactive settler and plant design configuration on the predicted performance of simultaneous C/N/P removal WWTPs. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[19]  J. B. Copp,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants. , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[21]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of WWTP control strategies made feasible , 2012 .

[22]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of biochemical, design and operational parameters of the Benchmark Simulation Model no. 2 , 2008 .

[23]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Modelling nitrous and nitric oxide emissions by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria , 2013, Environmental technology.

[24]  Weiwei Mo,et al.  Measuring the embodied energy in drinking water supply systems: a case study in the Great Lakes region. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  L Yerushalmi,et al.  Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[26]  L. Corominas,et al.  Comparison of different modeling approaches to better evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from whole wastewater treatment plants , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  I Nopens,et al.  Critical review of membrane bioreactor models--part 1: biokinetic and filtration models. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[28]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants. , 2009, Water research.

[29]  Riccardo Gori,et al.  Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes. , 2011, Water research.

[30]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[31]  J. Avery Critical review. , 2006, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.

[32]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  N2O production rate of an enriched ammonia-oxidising bacteria culture exponentially correlates to its ammonia oxidation rate. , 2012, Water research.

[33]  B. Smets,et al.  Modeling nitrous oxide production during biological nitrogen removal via nitrification and denitrification: extensions to the general ASM models. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  iEMSs 2008: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software , 2008 .

[36]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.