High-resolution Anorectal Manometry in the Diagnosis of Functional Defecation Disorder in Patients With Functional Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Aims High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) has been considered a first-line diagnostic tool for functional defecation disorder. However, clinical studies on HRAM used in constipation patients are very limited and few studies have reported the characteristics of anorectal pressure in Chinese patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of motility data in a cohort of Chinese patients with functional constipation. Methods A total of 82 consecutive patients with functional constipation who underwent a standardized HRAM were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The functional defecation disorder was classified into Rao’s types. Results The mean age of 82 patients was 51 years (range, 16–83 years). Indications for anorectal manometry were functional constipation for all patients. The mean resting pressure was 69.2 ± 21.2 mmHg (range, 24.5–126.9 mmHg). The mean maximum squeezing pressure was 198.4 ± 75.6 mmHg (range, 54.2–476.9 mmHg). The mean length of the anal high pressure zone was 3.4 ± 1.0 cm (range, 0.6–4.9 cm). Sixty (73.2%) patients were diagnosed as functional defecation disorder. In attempted defecation, type I was most common (n = 24), followed by type II (n = 12), type III (n = 11), and type IV (n = 13) that were present on HRAM according to Rao’s classification. In all 60 patients with functional defecation disorder, 37 were women and 23 were men. Men were significantly more likely than women to have functional defecation disorder (92.0% vs 64.9%, P = 0.014). Conclusion HRAM could be used as a test for the diagnosis of functional defecation disorder and functional defecation disorder is common in Chinese patients with functional constipation.

[1]  M. Fox,et al.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function , 2018, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

[2]  H. M. Li,et al.  [Normal values for solid state high resolution anorectal manometry in healthy adult volunteers]. , 2017, Zhonghua nei ke za zhi.

[3]  R. Burgell,et al.  Review article: dyssynergic defaecation and biofeedback therapy in the pathophysiology and management of functional constipation , 2017, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  B. Kuo,et al.  Gender differences in chronic constipation on anorectal motility , 2017, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[5]  T. Patcharatrakul,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyssynergic Defecation , 2016, Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility.

[6]  D. Drossman Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Rome IV. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[7]  P. Dinning,et al.  Colonic and anorectal motility testing in the high-resolution era , 2016, Current opinion in gastroenterology.

[8]  A. Bharucha,et al.  How to Perform and Interpret a High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Test , 2015, Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility.

[9]  R. Spiller,et al.  Bowel Disorders. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[10]  Emma J Horrocks,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation , 2015, Gut.

[11]  S. Hong,et al.  Comparison of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry With Water-perfused Anorectal Manometry , 2015, Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility.

[12]  谢小平,et al.  Normative values and its clinical significance of the anorectal manometry in Chinese from multi-center study , 2014 .

[13]  S. Scott,et al.  Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high‐resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[14]  S. Park,et al.  Normal values for high‐resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index , 2014, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[15]  Y. Lee,et al.  High Resolution and High Definition Anorectal Manometry and Pressure Topography: Diagnostic Advance or a New Kid on the Block? , 2013, Current Gastroenterology Reports.

[16]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Normal Values for High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry in Healthy Women: Effects of Age and Significance of Rectoanal Gradient , 2012, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[17]  Z. Li,et al.  Epidemiology of functional constipation and comparison with constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome: the Systematic Investigation of Gastrointestinal Diseases in China (SILC) , 2011, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  S. Scott,et al.  Manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function. , 2008, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[19]  M. Falagas,et al.  Epidemiology of constipation in Europe and Oceania: a systematic review , 2008, BMC gastroenterology.

[20]  M. Crowell,et al.  High-Resolution Manometry in the Evaluation of Anorectal Disorders: A Simultaneous Comparison With Water-Perfused Manometry , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[21]  J. Remes-Troche,et al.  Defecation disorders: Neuromuscular aspects and treatment , 2006, Current gastroenterology reports.

[22]  P. Enck,et al.  Functional anorectal disorders. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[23]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[24]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986 , 1989, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[25]  M. Mínguez,et al.  Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[26]  S. Walter,et al.  Rectal pressure response to a meal in patients with high spinal cord injury. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  E. Irvine,et al.  An epidemiological survey of constipation in Canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[28]  Leroi,et al.  Increased tone of the rectal wall in response to feeding persists in patients with cauda equina syndrome , 1999, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[29]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Variations in muscle tone of the human rectum: recordings with an electromechanical barostat. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[30]  Y. Katayama Bowel disorders. , 1990, Postgraduate medicine.