Cooperative problem solving with resource constraints are important in practical multi-agent systems. Resource constraints are necessary to handle practical problems including distributed task scheduling with limited resource availability. A dedicated framework called Resource Constrained DCOP (RCDCOP) has recently been proposed. RCDCOP models objective functions and resource constraints separately. A resource constraint is an n-ary constraint that represents the limit on the number of resources of a given type available to agents. Previous research addressing RCDCOPs employs the Adopt algorithm, which is an efficient solver for DCOPs. An important graph structure for Adopt is the pseudo-tree for constraint networks. A pseudo-tree implies a partial ordering of variables. In this variable ordering, n-ary constrained variables are placed on a single path of the tree. Therefore, resource constraints that have large arity augment the depth of the pseudo-tree. This also reduces the parallelism, and therefore the efficiency of Adopt. In this paper we propose another version of the Adopt algorithm for RCDCOP using a pseudo-tree that is generated ignoring resource constraints. The proposed method reduces the previous limitations in the construction of RCDCOP pseudo-trees. The key ideas of our work are as follows: (i) The pseudo-tree is generated ignoring resource constraints. (ii) Virtual variables are introduced, representing the usage of resources. These virtual variables are used to share resources among sub-trees. However, the addition of virtual variables increases the search space. To handle this problem, influence of placement of virtual variables/resources constraints in the pseudo tree is considered. Moreover the search is pruned using the bounds defined by the resource constraints if possible. These ideas are used to extend Adopt. The efficiency of our technique depends on the class of problems being considered, and we describe the obtained experimental results.
[1]
Eugene C. Freuder,et al.
Partial Constraint Satisfaction
,
1989,
IJCAI.
[2]
Boi Faltings,et al.
ODPOP: An Algorithm for Open/Distributed Constraint Optimization
,
2006,
AAAI.
[3]
Boi Faltings,et al.
A Scalable Method for Multiagent Constraint Optimization
,
2005,
IJCAI.
[4]
Milind Tambe,et al.
Taking DCOP to the real world: efficient complete solutions for distributed multi-event scheduling
,
2004,
Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..
[5]
Milind Tambe,et al.
Preprocessing techniques for accelerating the DCOP algorithm ADOPT
,
2005,
AAMAS '05.
[6]
Makoto Yokoo,et al.
Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees
,
2005,
Artif. Intell..
[7]
Victor R. Lesser,et al.
Solving distributed constraint optimization problems using cooperative mediation
,
2004,
Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..
[8]
Federico Pecora,et al.
Reasoning about and dynamically posting n-ary constraints in ADOPT
,
2006
.
[9]
Richard J. Wallace,et al.
Partial Constraint Satisfaction
,
1989,
IJCAI.
[10]
Makoto Yokoo,et al.
Multiply-constrained distributed constraint optimization
,
2006,
AAMAS '06.