Transport of aerosol to the Arctic: analysis of CALIOP and French aircraft data during the spring 2008 POLARCAT campaign

Abstract. Lidar and in situ observations performed during the Polar Study using Aircraft, Remote Sensing, Surface Measurements and Models, Climate, Chemistry, Aerosols and Transport (POLARCAT) campaign are reported here in terms of statistics to characterize aerosol properties over northern Europe using daily airborne measurements conducted between Svalbard and Scandinavia from 30 March to 11 April 2008. It is shown that during this period a rather large number of aerosol layers was observed in the troposphere, with a backscatter ratio at 532 nm of 1.2 (1.5 below 2 km, 1.2 between 5 and 7 km and a minimum in between). Their sources were identified using multispectral backscatter and depolarization airborne lidar measurements after careful calibration analysis. Transport analysis and comparisons between in situ and airborne lidar observations are also provided to assess the quality of this identification. Comparison with level 1 backscatter observations of the spaceborne Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) were carried out to adjust CALIOP multispectral observations to airborne observations on a statistical basis. Recalibration for CALIOP daytime 1064 nm signals leads to a decrease of their values by about 30%, possibly related to the use of the version 3.0 calibration procedure. No recalibration is made at 532 nm even though 532 nm scattering ratios appear to be biased low (−8%) because there are also significant differences in air mass sampling between airborne and CALIOP observations. Recalibration of the 1064 nm signal or correction of −5% negative bias in the 532 nm signal both could improve the CALIOP aerosol colour ratio expected for this campaign. The first hypothesis was retained in this work. Regional analyses in the European Arctic performed as a test emphasize the potential of the CALIOP spaceborne lidar for further monitoring in-depth properties of the aerosol layers over Arctic using infrared and depolarization observations. The CALIOP April 2008 global distribution of the aerosol backscatter reveal two regions with large backscatter below 2 km: the northern Atlantic between Greenland and Norway, and northern Siberia. The aerosol colour ratio increases between the source regions and the observations at latitudes above 70° N are consistent with a growth of the aerosol size once transported to the Arctic. The distribution of the aerosol optical properties in the mid-troposphere supports the known main transport pathways between the mid-latitudes and the Arctic.

[1]  H. Schlager,et al.  Long‐range transport and tropospheric ozone variability in the western Mediterranean region during the Intercontinental Transport of Ozone and Precursors (ITOP‐2004) campaign , 2007 .

[2]  J. D. de Gouw,et al.  An important contribution to springtime Arctic aerosol from biomass burning in Russia , 2010 .

[3]  A. Stohl,et al.  Pan-Arctic enhancement of light absorbing aerosol concentration due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004 , 2006 .

[4]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Airborne measurements of aerosol optical properties related to early spring transport of mid-latitude sources into the Arctic , 2009 .

[5]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  A variational scheme for retrieving ice cloud properties from combined radar, lidar, and infrared radiometer , 2008 .

[6]  David M. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Lidar Cloud and Aerosol Discrimination: Version 2 Algorithm and Initial Assessment of Performance , 2009 .

[7]  S. Leinert,et al.  Hygroscopic growth of sub-micrometer and one-micrometer aerosol particles measured during ACE-Asia , 2006 .

[8]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Seasonal characteristics of the physicochemical properties of North Atlantic marine atmospheric aerosols , 2007 .

[9]  K. Salzen,et al.  Arctic air pollution : Challenges and opportunities for the next decadeArctic air pollution : Challenges and opportunities for the next decade , 2016 .

[10]  A. Stohl,et al.  Anthropogenic and forest fire pollution aerosol transported to the Arctic: observations from the POLARCAT-France spring campaign , 2012 .

[11]  C. Ritter,et al.  Springtime Arctic aerosol: Smoke versus haze, a case study for March 2008 , 2012 .

[12]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Dual-wavelength linear depolarization ratio of volcanic aerosols: Lidar measurements of the Eyjafjallajökull plume over Maisach, Germany , 2012 .

[13]  Zhaoyan Liu,et al.  On the spectral dependence of backscatter from cirrus clouds: Assessing CALIOP's 1064 nm calibration assumptions using cloud physics lidar measurements , 2010 .

[14]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Retrieval of Cloud Properties Using CALIPSO Imaging Infrared Radiometer. Part I: Effective Emissivity and Optical Depth , 2012 .

[15]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Black carbon in the Arctic: the underestimated role of gas flaring and residential combustion emissions , 2013 .

[16]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results , 2010 .

[17]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  Sensitivity of Thermal Infrared Radiation at the Top of the Atmosphere and the Surface to Ice Cloud Microphysics , 2008 .

[18]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[19]  N. Pounder,et al.  From CloudSat‐CALIPSO to EarthCare: Evolution of the DARDAR cloud classification and its comparison to airborne radar‐lidar observations , 2013 .

[20]  O. Dubovik,et al.  Variability of aerosol and spectral lidar and backscatter and extinction ratios of key aerosol types derived from selected Aerosol Robotic Network locations , 2005 .

[21]  G. Shaw Arctic air pollution , 1988 .

[22]  David M. Winker,et al.  Fully Automated Detection of Cloud and Aerosol Layers in the CALIPSO Lidar Measurements , 2009 .

[23]  Larry W. Thomason,et al.  Tropical stratospheric aerosol layer from CALIPSO lidar observations , 2009 .

[24]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[25]  Chuanfeng Zhao,et al.  Increased Arctic cloud longwave emissivity associated with pollution from mid-latitudes , 2006, Nature.

[26]  E. Eloranta,et al.  Spatial and seasonal distribution of Arctic aerosols observed by the CALIOP satellite instrument ( 2006 – 2012 ) , 2013 .

[27]  A. Berjón,et al.  Aerosol characterization at the sub‐Arctic site Andenes (69°N, 16°E), by the analysis of columnar optical properties , 2012 .

[28]  David M. Winker,et al.  The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP , 2012 .

[29]  M. Tjernström,et al.  The vertical distribution of thin features over the Arctic analysed from CALIPSO observations , 2011 .

[30]  A. Stohl,et al.  A replacement for simple back trajectory calculations in the interpretation of atmospheric trace substance measurements , 2002 .

[31]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Springtime Arctic haze contributions of submicron organic particles from European and Asian combustion sources , 2011 .

[32]  T. Eck,et al.  Optical Properties of Atmospheric Aerosol in Maritime Environments , 2002 .

[33]  K. Rahn Relative importances of North America and Eurasia as sources of arctic aerosol , 1981 .

[34]  A. Stohl,et al.  Arctic Air Pollution: Origins and Impacts , 2007, Science.

[35]  David M. Winker,et al.  Assessment of the CALIPSO Lidar 532 nm attenuated backscatter calibration using the NASA LaRC airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar , 2010 .

[36]  R. Ferrare,et al.  Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples , 2011 .

[37]  Ann M. Fridlind,et al.  Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies , 2007 .

[38]  David M. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Calibration Algorithms. Part I: Nighttime 532-nm Parallel Channel and 532-nm Perpendicular Channel , 2009 .

[39]  D. Blake,et al.  Anthropogenic emissions during Arctas-A: mean transport characteristics and regional case studies , 2011 .

[40]  B. Holben,et al.  Airborne observation of aerosol optical depth during ARCTAS: vertical profiles, inter-comparison and fine-mode fraction , 2011 .

[41]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM 2006 , 2009 .

[43]  A. Stohl,et al.  Pan‐Arctic enhancements of light absorbing aerosol concentrations due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004 , 2006 .

[44]  X. Wang,et al.  Spaceborne lidar calibration from cirrus and molecular backscatter returns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[45]  A. Lambert,et al.  Characteristics of CALIOP attenuated backscatter noise: implication for cloud/aerosol detection , 2010 .

[46]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project , 2010 .

[47]  H. Fuelberg,et al.  A meteorological overview of the ARCTAS 2008 mission , 2009 .