Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher

This study undertook a phenomenographic analysis of academics’ ways of approaching their growth and development as a university teacher. The focus of the study is on the meanings and intentions underlying different ways of going about developing as a teacher, and how this relates to the ways in which academics understand the nature of teaching development and being a university teacher. Five different approaches to developing as a university teacher emerged, varying from a focus on building up a better knowledge of one’s content area, in order to become more familiar with what to teach, to continually increasing one’s understanding of what works and does not work for students, in order to become more effective in facilitating student learning. The approaches experienced by academics, and the meanings and intentions associated with them, are seen as constituting constraints on their potential for developing as a teacher. Implications for academic development are discussed.

[1]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Teachers' craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education , 1997 .

[2]  David Kember,et al.  Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning , 1994 .

[3]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[4]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Growing and Developing as a University Teacher--Variation in Meaning , 2003 .

[5]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[6]  Keith Wood,et al.  The experience of learning to teach: Changing student teachers' ways of understanding teaching , 2000 .

[7]  J. McKenzie,et al.  Variation and change in university teachers' ways of experiencing teaching , 2003 .

[8]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[9]  David Kember,et al.  Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning , 1993 .

[10]  Daniel Pratt,et al.  Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education , 1998 .

[11]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[12]  G. Nicholls.  New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education , 2005 .

[13]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[14]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[15]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .

[16]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods , 2005 .

[17]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Training to teach in higher education: a research agenda , 2000 .

[18]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[19]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[20]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind,et al.  Academics’ Views of the Relative Roles and Responsibilities of Teachers and Learners in a First‐Year University Course , 1998 .

[21]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning , 2001 .

[22]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[23]  Ranald Macdonald,et al.  The disjunction between lecturers' conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice , 1997 .

[24]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  A new dimension to understanding university teaching , 2004 .