WilcoxCV: an R package for fast variable selection in cross-validation

UNLABELLED In the last few years, numerous methods have been proposed for microarray-based class prediction. Although many of them have been designed especially for the case n << p (much more variables than observations), preliminary variable selection is almost always necessary when the number of genes reaches several tens of thousands, as usual in recent data sets. In the two-class setting, the Wilcoxon rank sum test statistic is, with the t-statistic, one of the standard approaches for variable selection. It is well known that the variable selection step must be seen as a part of classifier construction and, as such, be performed based on training data only. When classifier accuracy is evaluated via cross-validation or Monte-Carlo cross-validation, it means that we have to perform p Wilcoxon or t-tests for each iteration, which becomes a daunting task for increasing p. As a consequence, many authors often perform variable selection only once using all the available data, which can induce a dramatic underestimation of error rate and thus lead to misleadingly reporting predictive power. We propose a very fast implementation of variable selection based on the Wilcoxon test for use in cross-validation and Monte Carlo cross-validation (also known as random splitting into learning and test sets). This implementation is based on a simple mathematical formula using only the ranks calculated from the original data set. AVAILABILITY Our method is implemented in the freely available R package WilcoxCV which can be downloaded from the Comprehensive R Archive Network at http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/WilcoxCV.html.

[1]  T. Hastie,et al.  Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[2]  Constantin F. Aliferis,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis , 2004, Bioinform..

[3]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy , 2005, The Lancet.

[4]  Geoffrey J McLachlan,et al.  Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Dimension Reduction for Classification with Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2006, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[6]  Annette M. Molinaro,et al.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods , 2005, Bioinform..

[7]  Peter Bühlmann,et al.  Boosting for Tumor Classification with Gene Expression Data , 2003, Bioinform..

[8]  J. Ioannidis Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery? , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification? , 2004, Bioinform..

[10]  Jae Won Lee,et al.  An extensive comparison of recent classification tools applied to microarray data , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[11]  Gerhard Tutz,et al.  Identification of interaction patterns and classification with applications to microarray data , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[12]  Marcel Dettling,et al.  BagBoosting for tumor classification with gene expression data , 2004, Bioinform..

[13]  Anne-Laure Boulesteix,et al.  Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..