Variable Self-Efficacy as a Measurement for Behaviors in Cyber Security Operations

Training and development of skills gives individuals the knowledge and procedures required to perform their tasks. Training also requires individuals to develop reflective skills that help consolidate and transfer knowledge to long-term memory, where it then can be recalled in appropriate situations. But to develop reflective skills, one must first engage with the task’s demands and then analyse how one’s skills were appropriate or not for the situational demands, and how one could have also approached the situation differently. This process leads to an adaptable self-efficacy. It is still unclear how personality trait measures of self-efficacy can predict performance in cyber security operations. We developed an adaptable self-efficacy measure which was collected via an app. Findings support previous research that specific self-efficacy has better predictive validity, but also finds that an increased number of measurements could yield better effect sizes. This research shows how multiple measurements of specific self-efficacy can be done with minimized invasiveness while providing better measurement reliability and predictability. General findings and implications for further research are also discussed.

[1]  P. Hancock,et al.  The Human Factors of Cyber Network Defense , 2015 .

[2]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Affective Instability in Daily Life Is Predicted by Resting Heart Rate Variability , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  Peter de Jonge,et al.  Affective variability in depression: Revisiting the inertia–instability paradox , 2018, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Philip M. Westgate,et al.  Intraindividual variability in cortisol: Approaches, illustrations, and recommendations , 2017, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[5]  S. Segerstrom,et al.  Variability Modifies Life Satisfaction’s Association With Mortality Risk in Older Adults , 2015, Psychological science.

[6]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology , 2009 .

[7]  Ricardo G. Lugo,et al.  Exploring the Hybrid Space - Theoretical Framework Applying Cognitive Science in Military Cyberspace Operations , 2016, HCI.

[8]  Annchen R. Knodt,et al.  The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  J W Rowe,et al.  Intraindividual variability in perceived control in an older sample: the MacArthur successful aging studies. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[10]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies , 2005, The Journal of psychology.

[11]  Ricardo G. Lugo,et al.  Towards a Cognitive Agility Index: The Role of Metacognition in Human Computer Interaction , 2017, HCI.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[13]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[14]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Is General Self-Efficacy a Universal Construct?1 , 2002 .

[15]  Daniel T. Kuehl,et al.  From Cyberspace to Cyberpower: Defining the Problem , 2009 .

[16]  Holger Strulik,et al.  Patterns of Frailty in Older Adults: Comparing Results from Higher and Lower Income Countries Using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE) , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Aaron L. Pincus,et al.  Pathological Narcissism and the Severity, Variability, and Instability of Depressive Symptoms , 2018, Personality disorders.

[18]  Peter Kuppens,et al.  The Relationship between Individual Differences in Intraindividual Variability in Core Affect and Interpersonal Behaviour , 2010 .

[19]  John R. Nesselroade,et al.  Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. , 1991 .

[20]  A. Bandura GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[21]  James C. Christensen,et al.  Human Factors in Cyber Warfare II , 2014 .

[22]  M. Zimmerman Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions , 1990 .

[23]  Ricardo G. Lugo,et al.  Development and Application of the Hybrid Space App for Measuring Cognitive Focus in Hybrid Contexts , 2018, HCI.

[24]  F. Shaffer,et al.  An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms , 2017, Front. Public Health.

[25]  S. Segerstrom,et al.  Briefly Assessing Repetitive Thought Dimensions , 2016, Assessment.

[26]  Nasir D. Memon,et al.  Self-Efficacy in Cybersecurity Tasks and Its Relationship with Cybersecurity Competition and Work-Related Outcomes , 2016, ASE @ USENIX Security Symposium.

[27]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  The distinction between trait and state scales is not arbitrary: Comment on Allen and Potkay's "On the arbitrary distinction between traits and states." , 1983 .