Primitive computations in speech processing

Previous research suggests that artificial-language learners exposed to quasi-continuous speech can learn that the first and the last syllables of words have to belong to distinct classes (e.g., Endress & Bonatti, 2007; Peña, Bonatti, Nespor, & Mehler, 2002). The mechanisms of these generalizations, however, are debated. Here we show that participants learn such generalizations only when the crucial syllables are in edge positions (i.e., the first and the last), but not when they are in medial positions (i.e., the second and the fourth in pentasyllabic items). In contrast to the generalizations, participants readily perform statistical analyses also in word middles. In analogy to sequential memory, we suggest that participants extract the generalizations using a simple but specific mechanism that encodes the positions of syllables that occur in edges. Simultaneously, they use another mechanism to track the syllable distribution in the speech streams. In contrast to previous accounts, this model explains why the generalizations are faster than the statistical computations, require additional cues, and break down under different conditions, and why they can be performed at all. We also show that that similar edge-based mechanisms may explain many results in artificial-grammar learning and also various linguistic observations.

[1]  R. Henson Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute? , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Sébastien Pacton,et al.  An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Different Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Word and Rule Extraction from Speech , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation , 2005, Cognition.

[5]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[6]  M. Halle,et al.  An essay on stress , 1987 .

[7]  M. Braine,et al.  Learning the positions of words relative to a marker element. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Marina Nespor,et al.  An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[13]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[14]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[15]  M. Maybery,et al.  Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally? , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  D. Shanks,et al.  Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). , 1999 .

[17]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[18]  B. Hayes Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[19]  R. Henson Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Braine,et al.  On learning the grammatical order of words. , 1963, Psychological review.

[21]  C. Gallistel The Replacement of General-Purpose Learning Models with Adaptively Specialized Learning Modules , 2000 .

[22]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Generalized alignment , 1993 .

[23]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  The Role of Pause Cues in Language Learning: The Emergence of Event-related Potentials Related to Sequence Processing , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D T Hakes,et al.  Generalization of serial position in rote serial learning. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  K. H. Smith Rule-governed intrusions in the free recall of structured letter pairs. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Nick Chater,et al.  Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[30]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Jenny R Saffran,et al.  Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning , 2001, Cognition.

[32]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  N. Burgess,et al.  Temporal Grouping Effects in Immediate Recall: A Working Memory Analysis , 1996 .

[34]  L. Gerken,et al.  Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  Toben H. Mintz Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[36]  A. Endress,et al.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream , 2007, Cognition.

[37]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[38]  K H Smith,et al.  Grammatical intrusions in the recall of structured letter pairs: mediated transfer or position learning? , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  T. Shallice,et al.  Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. , 2006, Psychological review.

[41]  A. Reber Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. , 1969 .

[42]  René Kager,et al.  Consequences of catalexis , 1995 .

[43]  R. Gómez,et al.  Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge , 1999, Cognition.

[44]  T Johnstone,et al.  Abstraction Processes in Artificial Grammar Learning , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  G. Miller,et al.  Free recall of redundant strings of letters. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  David Marr,et al.  Visual information processing: artificial intelligence and the sensorium of sight , 1987 .

[47]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[48]  Jill Fain Lehman,et al.  A Gentle Introduction to Soar, an Architecture for Human Cognition. , 1996 .

[49]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Does Grammar Start Where Statistics Stop? , 2002, Science.

[50]  D Broadbent,et al.  Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  北京大学汉语语言学研究中心《语言学论丛》编委会,et al.  語言學論叢 = Essays on linguistics , 2009 .

[52]  Marit Julien,et al.  Syntactic heads and word formation , 2002 .

[53]  N. Chater,et al.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning : A reevaluation , 1996 .

[54]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .

[55]  Kirk H. Smith,et al.  Learning Co-occurrence restrictions: Rule induction or rote learning? , 1969 .

[56]  R. Gómez,et al.  A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[57]  Richard Reviewer-Granger Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Allen Newell,et al.  Physical Symbol Systems , 1980, Cogn. Sci..