Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas.

MRI using T(1) weighted, T(2) weighted and gadolinium-enhanced sequences plays a central clinical role in diagnosis, characterisation, surveillance and therapeutic monitoring of gliomas. Such conventional MRI protocols provide high resolution multiplanar structural information, and substantially improved tissue characterisation compared with CT. However, the MRI signal lacks biological specificity, e.g. T(2) weighted dependent signal abnormality is dominated by tissue water content, and contrast enhancement reflects a non-specific increase in blood-brain barrier permeability. This limits non-invasive glioma diagnosis, characterisation and therapeutic planning and assessment of active tumour load may be confounded by treatment-related effects. The complex features of glioma morphology and often subtle changes between MRI examinations are also frequently difficult to detect reliably by visual inspection of the images, even by an experienced radiologist. Moreover, the most widely used response criteria in clinical practice and therapeutic trials rely on linear measurements of enhancing tumour and are further challenged by the irregular shape and heterogeneous composition of gliomas. This contributes to the poor correlation of these criteria with hard clinical endpoints. While conventional MRI is widely available and provides essential anatomical information, the lack of pathology-specific biomarkers available from standard MRI sequences and methods of image analysis used limit overall diagnostic and prognostic efficacy of the examination.

[1]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Y. Sakamoto,et al.  MR Gd-DTPA enhancement of radiation brain injury. , 1992, Radiation medicine.

[3]  A. Holodny,et al.  MRI of high-grade glial tumors: correlation between the degree of contrast enhancement and the volume of surrounding edema , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[4]  L. Bozzao,et al.  Supratentorial diffuse astrocytic tumours: proposal of an MRI classification , 1997, European Radiology.

[5]  B. Rosen,et al.  Early changes measured by magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability following dexamethasone treatment in patients with brain tumors. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  M Takahashi,et al.  Posttherapeutic intraaxial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from nonneoplastic contrast-enhancing tissue. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  Yasuhiro Inoue,et al.  Localization and trafficking of membrane-bound MMPs , 2001 .

[8]  R. Sevick,et al.  How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study , 2002, Neurology.

[9]  T. Makabe,et al.  Assessment of the pathological grade of astrocytic gliomas using an MRI score , 1994, Neuroradiology.

[10]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression , 2004, Neurology.

[11]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  Hans Rolf Jäger,et al.  Differential chemosensitivity of tumor components in a malignant oligodendroglioma: assessment with diffusion-weighted, perfusion-weighted, and serial volumetric MR imaging. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  B. Condon,et al.  Measurement of tumor "size" in recurrent malignant glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D? , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  T. Ryken,et al.  Can tumor contrast enhancement be used as a criterion for differentiating tumor grades of oligodendrogliomas? , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics Predict Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Amplification Status in Glioblastoma , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  Elias R Melhem,et al.  Advanced MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of intraaxial brain tumors in adults. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. , 2006, Neuro-oncology.

[18]  Bradley J Erickson,et al.  Validation of neuroradiologic response assessment in gliomas: measurement by RECIST, two-dimensional, computer-assisted tumor area, and computer-assisted tumor volume methods. , 2006, Neuro-oncology.

[19]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy , 2006, Neurology.

[20]  S. Horvath,et al.  Relationship between Survival and Edema in Malignant Gliomas: Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Neuronal Pentraxin 2 , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  Elizabeth Bullitt,et al.  A review of micro- and macrovascular analyses in the assessment of tumor-associated vasculature as visualized by MR , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Relationship between gene expression and enhancement in glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory DNA microarray analysis. , 2008, Radiology.

[23]  P. Wen,et al.  Response criteria for glioma , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[24]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[26]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[27]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.