Quality Assessment of Virtual Reality Videos

360-degree spherical images/videos, also called virtual reality (VR) images/videos, can provide an immersive experience of real scenes in some specific systems. This makes it widely used in VR games, sporting events and VR movies. However, due to its high resolution, it is so difficult to transmit, compress or store VR images/videos. Therefore, it is significant to study how noise affects the quality of VR images. To this end, this paper builds a VR video database, and carries out subjective and objective experiments on them. Specifically, first, six standard panoramic videos are processed by inputting three kinds of distorted types to establish a VR video database which comprises 96 videos. Second, we utilize the Double Stimulus Injury Scale (DSIS) for subjective experiments. All subjective scores are from 20 non-professional viewers. Third, we utilize 6 existing objective metrics to validate our database. Finally, experimental results demonstrate that the established VR database is suitable for subjective and objective quality evaluation of VR video. Our work has alleviated the problem of missing VR databases.

[1]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[2]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[3]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  TID2008 – A database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics , 2004 .

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000 , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Djemel Ziou,et al.  Image Quality Metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[8]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Jiachen Yang,et al.  Quality Index for Stereoscopic Images by Separately Evaluating Adding and Subtracting , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  Chan-Byoung Chae,et al.  Subjective and objective quality assessment of videos in error-prone network environments , 2015, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[13]  Weisi Lin,et al.  The Analysis of Image Contrast: From Quality Assessment to Automatic Enhancement , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[14]  Shiqi Wang,et al.  Objective Quality Assessment of Screen Content Images by Structure Information , 2016, PCM.

[15]  Chunping Hou,et al.  Subjective quality assessment of animation images , 2017, 2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

[16]  Shu Yang,et al.  Subjective and objective quality assessment of panoramic videos in virtual reality environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW).

[17]  Weisi Lin,et al.  CVIQD: Subjective quality evaluation of compressed virtual reality images , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).