Molecular photoacoustic tomography of breast cancer using receptor targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents

In this report, we present a breast imaging technique combining high-resolution near-infrared (NIR) light induced photoacoustic tomography (PAT) with NIR dye-labeled amino-terminal fragments of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (NIR830-ATF-IONP) for breast cancer imaging using an orthotopic mouse mammary tumor model. We show that accumulation of the targeted nanoparticles in the tumor led to photoacoustic contrast enhancement due to the high absorption of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP). NIR fluorescence images were used to validate specific delivery of NIR830-ATF-IONP to mouse mammary tumors. We found that systemic delivery of the targeted IONP produced 4- and 10-fold enhancement in photoacoustic signals in the tumor, compared to the tumor of the mice that received non-targeted IONP or control mice. The use of targeted nanoparticles allowed imaging of tumors located as deep as 3.1 cm beneath the normal tissues. Our study indicates the potential of the combination of photoacoustic tomography and receptor-targeted NIR830-ATF-IONP as a clinical tool that can provide improved specificity and sensitivity for breast cancer detection.

[1]  Da Xing,et al.  Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy based on two-dimensional scanning galvanometer , 2012 .

[2]  N. Brünner,et al.  Comparative evaluation of urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor expression in primary breast carcinomas and on metastatic tumor cells , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[3]  Junjie Yao,et al.  Conditional HIF-1 induction produces multistage neovascularization with stage-specific sensitivity to VEGFR inhibitors and myeloid cell independence. , 2011, Blood.

[4]  E. Dublin,et al.  Immunohistochemical expression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in breast carcinoma. Fibroblastic expression has strong associations with tumor pathology. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[5]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  “Genes” , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[7]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[8]  P. Jain,et al.  Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  V. Zharov,et al.  Golden carbon nanotubes as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal high-contrast molecular agents. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[10]  Thomas Kelly,et al.  In vivo magnetic enrichment and multiplex photoacoustic detection of circulating tumour cells. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[11]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[12]  Qifa Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of breast tumor margins in vivo with intraoperative photoacoustic imaging. , 2012, Optics express.

[13]  Lei Xi,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging based on MEMS mirror scanning , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[14]  Robert A Kruger,et al.  Photoacoustic angiography of the breast. , 2010, Medical physics.

[15]  Manojit Pramanik,et al.  Sentinel lymph nodes in the rat: noninvasive photoacoustic and US imaging with a clinical US system. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  M. Hofmann From scinti-mammography and metabolic imaging to receptor targeted PET-new principles of breast cancer detection. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[17]  G. D'aiuto,et al.  Human urokinase receptor concentration in malignant and benign breast tumors by in vitro quantitative autoradiography: comparison with urokinase levels. , 1993, Cancer research.

[18]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. , 2003, Genes & development.

[19]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  Feng Gao,et al.  In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bioconjugated gold nanocages. , 2010, ACS nano.

[21]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography and fluorescence molecular tomography: a comparative study based on indocyanine green. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  Manojit Pramanik,et al.  Molecular photoacoustic imaging of angiogenesis with integrin‐targeted gold nanobeacons , 2011, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels: noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats--volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[24]  Wiendelt Steenbergen,et al.  Photoacoustic mammography laboratory prototype: imaging of breast tissue phantoms. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[26]  Shuming Nie,et al.  Receptor-Targeted Nanoparticles for In vivo Imaging of Breast Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[28]  François Bénard,et al.  Imaging in breast cancer: Single-photon computed tomography and positron-emission tomography , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[29]  L. Strekowski,,et al.  New Near-Infrared Cyanine Dyes for Labelling of Proteins , 1993 .

[30]  Xinmai Yang,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography of a rat cerebral cortex in vivo with au nanocages as an optical contrast agent. , 2007, Nano letters.

[31]  Younan Xia,et al.  Gold nanocages as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging. , 2011, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[32]  Srirang Manohar,et al.  Gold nanorods as molecular contrast agents in photoacoustic imaging: the promises and the caveats. , 2011, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[33]  E. Andreopoulou,et al.  An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[35]  R Weissleder,et al.  Tumoral distribution of long-circulating dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in a rodent model. , 2000, Radiology.

[36]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.