Novel methods for mapping the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy

The cavernous nerves, which course along the surface of the prostate gland, are responsible for erectile function. During radical prostatectomy, urologists are challenged in preserving these nerves and their function. Cavernous nerves are microscopic and show variable location in different patients; therefore, postoperative sexual potency rates are widely variable following radical prostatectomy. A variety of technologies, including electrical and optical nerve stimulation, dye-based optical fluorescence and microscopy, spectroscopy, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have all been used to study cavernous nerve anatomy and physiology, and some of these methods are also potential intraoperative methods for identifying and preserving cavernous nerves. However, all of these technologies have inherent limitations, including slow or inconsistent nerve responses, poor image resolution, shallow image depth, slow image acquisition times and/or safety concerns. New and emerging technologies, as well as multimodal approaches combining existing methods, hold promise for improved postoperative sexual outcomes and patient quality of life following radical prostatectomy.

[1]  M. Gleave,et al.  A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[2]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[3]  A. Tewari,et al.  Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Michael A Fiddy,et al.  Combined image-processing algorithms for improved optical coherence tomography of prostate nerves. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  L. Klotz,et al.  Neurostimulation during radical prostatectomy: improving nerve-sparing techniques. , 2000, Seminars in urologic oncology.

[7]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[8]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Combined optical and electrical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  Steven S Raman,et al.  Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2012, Radiology.

[10]  Soroush Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Imaging the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using optical coherence tomography , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  A. Labanaris,et al.  The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy , 2009, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[12]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance , 2012, Nature Communications.

[13]  Toby C. Cornish,et al.  High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[14]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[15]  Satoru Takahashi,et al.  Efficacy of Using Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Capsule Invasion for Decision-Making About Neurovascular Bundle Preservation in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy , 2013, Korean journal of urology.

[16]  Gwen A. Lagoda,et al.  Continuous-wave infrared subsurface optical stimulation of the rat prostate cavernous nerves using a 1490-nm diode laser. , 2013, Urology.

[17]  Y. Fukabori,et al.  A simple and reliable monitoring system to confirm the preservation of the cavernous nerves , 2001, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[18]  N. Fried,et al.  A Compact Laparoscopic Probe for Optical Stimulation of the Prostate Nerves , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[19]  L. Su,et al.  Intraoperative tissue characterization and imaging. , 2009, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[20]  J. Hossack,et al.  3D prostate elastography: algorithm, simulations and experiments , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  S A Boppart,et al.  Real-time optical coherence tomography for minimally invasive imaging of prostate ablation. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[22]  I. Bigio,et al.  Comparison of elastic scattering spectroscopy with histology in ex vivo prostate glands: potential application for optically guided biopsy and directed treatment , 2013, Lasers in Medical Science.

[23]  T. Scheenen,et al.  Image quality and cancer visibility of T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the prostate at 7 Tesla , 2014, European Radiology.

[24]  T. Tzai,et al.  Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[25]  P. Walsh,et al.  Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[26]  W. Denk,et al.  Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Science.

[27]  M. Harisinghani,et al.  Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[28]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[29]  Serhat Tozburun,et al.  Temperature-controlled optical stimulation of the rat prostate cavernous nerves , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  C. Brendler,et al.  Does the CaverMap device help preserve potency? , 2001, Current urology reports.

[31]  M. Pomper,et al.  Focal positive prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in ganglionic tissues associated with prostate neurovascular bundle: implications for novel intraoperative PSMA-based fluorescent imaging techniques. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[32]  L. Klotz,et al.  Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy. , 1999, Urology.

[33]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[34]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Label-free high-resolution imaging of prostate glands and cavernous nerves using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[35]  Dustin Tyler,et al.  Hybrid electro-optical stimulation of the rat sciatic nerve induces force generation in the plantarflexor muscles , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[36]  W. Steers,et al.  Fiberoptic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[37]  R. Passariello,et al.  Use of multiparametric MR with neurovascular bundle evaluation to optimize the oncological and functional management of patients considered for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[38]  H. Axelson,et al.  Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation and Laser-Doppler flowmetry during radical prostatectomy. , 2013, The journal of sexual medicine.

[39]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Feasibility of T2‐weighted turbo spin echo imaging of the human prostate at 7 tesla , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  A. Tewari,et al.  Real‐time in vivo periprostatic nerve tracking using multiphoton microscopy in a rat survival surgery model: a promising pre‐clinical study for enhanced nerve‐sparing surgery , 2015, BJU international.

[41]  C. Kendall,et al.  Optical diagnostics in urology: current applications and future prospects , 2003, BJU international.

[42]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical biopsy in human urologic tissue using optical coherence tomography. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[43]  Li-Ming Su,et al.  Noncontact stimulation of the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using a tunable-wavelength thulium fiber laser. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[44]  J. D. Del Pizzo,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for large renal masses. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[45]  Jonathan M. Sorger,et al.  Nerve mapping for prostatectomies: novel technologies under development. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[46]  P. Konrad,et al.  Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. , 2005, Optics letters.

[47]  Takeshi Yoshida,et al.  Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[48]  P. Cesare,et al.  Ion channels gated by heat. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  K. Tamura,et al.  Photodynamic diagnosis of positive margin during radical prostatectomy: Preliminary experience with 5‐aminolevulinic acid , 2011, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[50]  M. Canpolat,et al.  Detecting positive surgical margins using single optical fiber probe during radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. , 2014, Urology.

[51]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Biophysical mechanisms of transient optical stimulation of peripheral nerve. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[52]  B. Park,et al.  Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[53]  Ji Hyung Yu,et al.  Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[54]  David Huang,et al.  Handbook of optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[55]  W. Catalona,et al.  Efficacy of first-generation Cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons. , 2001, Urology.

[56]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. , 1997, Science.

[57]  Gwen A. Lagoda,et al.  Infrared Laser Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Diagnostic Method for Intra-Operative Identification and Preservation of the Prostate Cavernous Nerves , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[58]  P. Walsh,et al.  Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[59]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Ultrasound elastography: enabling technology for image guided laparoscopic prostatectomy , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[60]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography as a method for identifying benign and malignant microscopic structures in the prostate gland. , 2000, Urology.

[61]  Ibrahim Karam,et al.  Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction. , 2011, European urology.

[62]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[63]  Austin R. Duke,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in response to hybrid electro-optical stimulation , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[64]  R. Kuhn 852 RESULTS OF USING A NEW TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF NERVE TISSUE DURING ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY , 2013 .

[65]  Anthony V D'Amico,et al.  Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[66]  W. Steers,et al.  Fiberoptic imaging for urologic surgery , 2009, Current urology reports.

[67]  Soroush Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of cavernous nerves: a step toward real-time intraoperative imaging during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urology.

[68]  N. S. van den Berg,et al.  Optimisation of fluorescence guidance during robot-assisted laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy for prostate cancer. , 2014, European urology.

[69]  Abhishek Srivastava,et al.  Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy , 2011, Current opinion in urology.

[70]  M. Peterson,et al.  Variability of results of cavernous nerve stimulation during radical prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[71]  Benjamin Kaffenberger,et al.  The use of high resolution optical coherence tomography to evaluate robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[72]  Trushar Patel,et al.  A Pilot Study of Laparoscopic Doppler Ultrasound Probe to Map Arterial Vascular Flow within the Neurovascular Bundle during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy , 2013, Prostate cancer.

[73]  R. Knuechel,et al.  Photodynamic diagnosis of prostate cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid--first clinical experiences. , 2008, Urology.

[74]  C. Brendler,et al.  A positive caver map response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Urology.

[75]  A. Costello,et al.  Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region , 2011, BJU international.

[76]  Abhishek Srivastava,et al.  Advances in imaging the neurovascular bundle , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[77]  Watt W Webb,et al.  Multiphoton microscopy of prostate and periprostatic neural tissue: a promising imaging technique for improving nerve-sparing prostatectomy. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[78]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  In vivo 3D neuroanatomical evaluation of periprostatic nerve plexus with 3T-MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[79]  G. Wiggins,et al.  T2‐weighted prostate MRI at 7 tesla using a simplified external transmit‐receive coil array: Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings in two prostate cancer patients , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[80]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Origin and characterization of retrograde labeled neurons supplying the rat urethra using fiberoptic confocal fluorescent microscopy in vivo and immunohistochemistry. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[81]  L. Su,et al.  Intraoperative optical imaging and tissue interrogation during urologic surgery , 2014, Current opinion in urology.

[82]  N Stone,et al.  Assessment of fiberoptic near-infrared raman spectroscopy for diagnosis of bladder and prostate cancer. , 2005, Urology.

[83]  Sharon Thomsen,et al.  Optically mediated nerve stimulation: Identification of injury thresholds , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[84]  Kazuto Ito,et al.  Preliminary results of a monitoring system to confirm the preservation of cavernous nerves , 2003, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[85]  Abhishek Srivastava,et al.  Multiphoton microscopy for structure identification in human prostate and periprostatic tissue: implications in prostate cancer surgery , 2011, BJU international.

[86]  I. Nadelhaft,et al.  Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat , 2008, BJU international.

[87]  Serhat Tozburun,et al.  Subsurface near‐infrared laser stimulation of the periprostatic cavernous nerves , 2012, Journal of biophotonics.

[88]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Second prize: preliminary experience with the Niris optical coherence tomography system during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[89]  Yong-Koo Park,et al.  Neuroanatomical Study of Periprostatic Nerve Distributions Using Human Cadaver Prostate , 2010, Journal of Korean medical science.

[90]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Tandem-robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study. , 2011, Urology.

[91]  B. Bouma,et al.  Handbook of Optical Coherence Tomography , 2001 .

[92]  R. Knuechel,et al.  Intraoperative photodynamic evaluation of surgical margins during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy with the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[93]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pictorial essay. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[94]  R. Kuhn MP37-03 REAL-TIME NERVE MAPPING DURING RARP TO IDENTIFY NERVES INVOLVED IN THE ERECTILE RESPONSE , 2014 .

[95]  Gregory Hager,et al.  Ultrasound elastography as a tool for imaging guidance during prostatectomy: Initial experience , 2012, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[96]  P. Luijten,et al.  31P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with 1H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[97]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  Dynamic real-time microscopy of the urinary tract using confocal laser endomicroscopy. , 2011, Urology.

[98]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Initial clinical experience , 1997 .

[99]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[100]  Jean-Alexandre Long,et al.  Real-time robotic transrectal ultrasound navigation during robotic radical prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. , 2012, Urology.

[101]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.

[102]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle , 2005, BJU international.

[103]  Xueding Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography: a potential new tool for prostate cancer , 2010, Biomedical optics express.