Accuracy of Real-Time Tissue Elastography for the Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Background: The prognosis and management of hepatic fibrosis are closely related to the stage of the disease. The limitations of liver biopsy, which is the gold standard for treatment, include its invasiveness and sampling error. Ultrasound elasticity might be the most promising imaging technology for the noninvasive and accurate assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Real-time tissue elastography (RTE) measures the relative stiffness of the tissue in the region of interest caused by the heartbeat. Many studies have verified that RTE is useful for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Purpose: To determine the formula of the liver fibrosis index for chronic hepatitis B (BLFI) and to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the BLFI for hepatic fibrosis compared with the liver fibrosis index (LFI). Materials and Methods: RTE was performed in 747 prospectively enrolled patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or cirrhosis from 8 centers in China; 375 patients were analyzed as the training set, and 372 patients were evaluated as the validation set. The fibrosis stage was diagnosed from pathological specimens obtained by ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Nine image features were measured from strain images, and the new formula for the BLFI was obtained by combining the nine imaging features of the RTE images using multiple regression analysis of the training set. The BLFI and LFI were compared with the pathological fibrosis stage at diagnosis, and the diagnostic performances of the indexes were compared. Results: The Spearman correlation coefficient between the BLFI and hepatic fibrosis stages was significantly positive (r = 0.711, p < 0.001), and significant differences were present between all disease stages. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of the BLFI and LFI for predicting significant fibrosis (S0-S1 vs. S2-S4) were 0.858 and 0.858, respectively. For cirrhosis (S0-S3 vs. S4), the AUROC curves of the BLFI and LFI were 0.868 and 0.862, respectively. Conclusion: The results of this large, multicenter study confirmed that RTE is valuable for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in patients with CHB. However, the diagnostic efficiencies of the new BLFI and the original LFI, which were based on CHC, for the assessment of CHB hepatic fibrosis were similar; thus, the LFI has the potential to be used to directly evaluate the extent of hepatic fibrosis in patients with CHB.

[1]  F. Schaefer,et al.  EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology , 2013, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[2]  J. Hayashi,et al.  Transient elastography for patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus infection: Non‐invasive, quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis , 2007, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.

[3]  J. Jia,et al.  Update on epidemiology of hepatitis B and C in China , 2013, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[4]  Hong Ai,et al.  Real-time elastography with a novel quantitative technology for assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Masanori Abe,et al.  Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: noninvasive diagnosis by means of real-time tissue elastography--establishment of the method for measurement. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  S. Bota,et al.  Liver stiffness measurements in patients with HBV vs HCV chronic hepatitis: a comparative study. , 2010, World journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  H Ermert,et al.  [Ultrasound elastography of the prostate. A new technique for tumor detection]. , 2000, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[8]  Lai Wei,et al.  [Introduction and comments on EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection]. , 2011, Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology.

[9]  M. Kudo Japan’s Successful Model of Nationwide Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Highlighting the Urgent Need for Global Surveillance , 2012, Liver Cancer.

[10]  R. Goldin,et al.  Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection , 2004 .

[11]  M. Fiel Pathology of chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C. , 2010, Clinics in liver disease.

[12]  M. Yuen,et al.  Prevalence of Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: Implications for Treatment and Management , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. , 2012, Journal of hepatology.

[14]  Eva Herrmann,et al.  Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[15]  M. Kudo,et al.  Quantitative Levels of Hepatitis B Virus DNA and Surface Antigen and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatitis B Receiving Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy , 2014, Liver Cancer.

[16]  T. Asselah,et al.  Direct comparison of diagnostic performance of transient elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C , 2012, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[17]  V. Paradis,et al.  Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[18]  Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. , 1994, Hepatology.

[19]  M. Kudo,et al.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver , 2013, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[20]  Non-invasive evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in patients with Chronic Hepatitis C using Elastography , 2007 .

[21]  H. Zhuang,et al.  [Updates of EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection]. , 2012, Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology.

[22]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  Novel Image Analysis Method Using Ultrasound Elastography for Noninvasive Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 2013, Oncology.

[23]  O H Gilja,et al.  EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2013, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[24]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 1994 .

[25]  M. Kudo Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence Risk by Ultrasound Elastography , 2014, Liver Cancer.

[26]  Limei Xie,et al.  Real‐time Elastography for Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[27]  Masatoshi Kudo,et al.  Assessment of Liver Fibrosis with Real-Time Tissue Elastography in Chronic Viral Hepatitis , 2013, Oncology.

[28]  F. Degos,et al.  Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey , 2000, Hepatology.

[29]  D. Y. Kim,et al.  Epidemiology and Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2012, Liver Cancer.

[30]  S. Zeuzem,et al.  EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection. , 2011, Journal of hepatology.